法律与文学的关联性问题研究

发布时间：2018-05-09 02:25

本文选题：法律与文学 + 相关性　；参考：《中国政法大学》2011年硕士论文

【摘要】：法律与文学运动作为一个“跨学科”研究,其理论基础、理论构成,乃至最终目的皆是为了阐明“法律”与“文学”这两个貌似完全无关,又似乎存在着千丝万缕的联系的学科之间,到底在何种程度上,何种意义上,具有哪些联系。本文就是试图从“相关性”的角度,对“法律与文学”运动进行检视。通过这场学术运动既有的学术史的梳理及学术框架的归纳,比较清晰地勾勒出这一学术运动在“相关性”层面上已有的研究成果及现有研究中所存在的问题。与此同时,本文着重关注了当代研究者在“相关性”角度上提出的,可能对这一学术运动的理论基础产生动摇的重要批评,同时从理论和实践的不同角度对上述批评进行了评论和回应。最后,本文试图通过对“法律与文学”研究中对于法律与文学相关性问题的新理论的探讨,提出笔者所认为的一条可行的“法律与文学”研究路径,即发生在具体司法过程中的“法律”与“文学”的关联,并且研究其对于具体司法的影响。笔者通过2001年著名的“张学英诉蒋伦芳遗嘱继承案”对笔者上述的理论框架进行了具体案例文本上的实践。本文试图在深刻理解、梳理前人研究成果,并且在对于这些成果的检视、论辩的基础上,为这一学术运动在“确定性”方面提供些许新的思路。
[Abstract]:As a "interdisciplinary" study, the theoretical foundation, the Theoretical Constitution and the ultimate aim of the movement of law and literature are to elucidate the two seemingly completely irrelevant and seemingly inextricable links between the "law" and "Literature". To what extent, in what sense, and in relation to it, what is the relationship between them. It is an attempt to examine the movement of "law and literature" from the angle of "relevance". Through the combing of the academic history of this academic movement and the induction of the academic framework, the existing research achievements and existing problems in the "relevance" level of this academic movement are clearly outlined.
At the same time, this paper focuses on the "relevance" of contemporary researchers, which may be critical to the theoretical basis of this academic movement, and reviews and responds to the above criticism from different angles of theory and practice.
Finally, this paper attempts to propose a feasible path for the study of "law and literature", that is, the relevance of "law" and "Literature" in the specific judicial process, and to study the specific judicature through the study of the new theory of law and literature on the relevance of law and literature in the study of law and literature. Influenced by the famous "Zhang Xueying v. Jiang Lunfang's will succession" in 2001, the author carried out a concrete case text practice on the author's theoretical framework.
This article attempts to understand the achievements of previous studies in a profound understanding and to provide some new ideas for this academic movement in the "certainty" on the basis of the examination and debate of these achievements.

【学位授予单位】：中国政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D90-05

【参考文献】