德沃金法律原则识别理论研究

发布时间：2018-05-19 00:22

本文选题：德沃金 + 法律原则　；参考：《南京师范大学》2012年硕士论文

【摘要】：罗纳德·德沃金是美国当代著名的法学思想大师,其法律原则问题的相关理论不仅在西方法学界引发了热烈的讨论与争议,在中国大陆也一直颇受瞩目。德沃金的法律原则识别理论不仅具有深厚的理论价值,对司法实践也有重要意义。引言部分首先介绍了我国大陆以法律原则裁判的第一个案例,指出中美法理学界对法律原则的不同见解,强调对法律原则进行识别的必要性及重要性。德沃金法律原则识别的内涵一章中,首先界定了法律原则的明确概念,指出了法律原则是被发现的,并描述了法律原则的发现过程。其次,阐述了本文最重要的内容——法律原则识别的概念、特征及识别法律原则的重要意义在于弥补法律规则的疏漏。法律原则识别方法一章中,第一,详细介绍了德沃金关于法律原则识别的建构性阐释方法。第二,通过法律原则的特征来进行法律原则识别,通过对比法律原则与道德、法律规则、政策与标准的区别来识别原则。第三,通过法律原则的存在形式来识别法律原则。对法律原则识别的理论的评价一章中,对“休谟问题”进行说明,引出了德沃金原则识别与分析法学派之间的巨大分歧,并概括“外在怀疑论”、“内在怀疑论”对德沃金原则识别理论的质疑,得出德沃金的法律原则识别理论过于理想化,不具有现实可行性的结论。最后,通过对比了中国与美国不同的国情,说明德沃金的原则识别理论也不适用于中国得司法实践。
[Abstract]:Ronald Dworkin is a famous contemporary American legal thought master. The relevant theories of his legal principles have not only aroused heated discussion and controversy in western legal circles, but also attracted much attention in mainland China. Dworkin's theory of legal principle recognition is not only of profound theoretical value, but also of great significance to judicial practice. The introduction first introduces the first case of the judgment based on the principle of law in the mainland of China, points out the different opinions of the Chinese and American jurists on the principle of law, and emphasizes the necessity and importance of the recognition of the principle of law. In the chapter of the connotation of Dworkin's recognition of legal principles, the author first defines the clear concept of legal principles, points out that legal principles are discovered, and describes the discovery process of legal principles. Secondly, this paper expounds the most important content of this article-the concept of legal principle recognition, the characteristics and the significance of identifying legal principle is to make up for the omission of legal rules. The first chapter introduces Dworkin's constructive interpretation of legal principle recognition. The second is to identify the legal principles through the characteristics of the legal principles, and to identify the principles by contrasting the differences between the legal principles and the morals, the legal rules, the policies and the standards. Third, the existence of legal principles to identify the form of legal principles. In the chapter of evaluation of the theory of legal principle recognition, Hume problem is explained, which leads to the great difference between Dworkin principle recognition and analytic school, and generalizes "external skepticism". By questioning Dworkin's principle recognition theory, the conclusion that Dworkin's legal principle recognition theory is too idealized and not feasible is concluded. Finally, by comparing the different national conditions between China and the United States, it is shown that Dworkin's principle recognition theory is not applicable to the judicial practice in China.
【学位授予单位】：南京师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D90

【参考文献】