法治评估的另一种路径:来自WGI法治指数的启示

发布时间：2018-05-19 08:36

本文选题：WGI + 法治　；参考：《时代法学》2016年06期

【摘要】：法治指数评估的路径选择需要结合域外法治评估的实践经验进行完善和创新。WGI法治指数评估是建立在不同数据库的数据信息的"二次分析"基础上来测量一国的法治估计值,其内在逻辑区别于国内法治指数评估的路径选择。通过分析WGI法治指数评估路径的选择,发现其数据信息的收集、处理乃至法治评估结果的公布和使用需要为我国法治指数评估提供了经验借鉴,主要表现为一是要充分考虑指数结果的"参照"功能而非"依照"功能;二是要语境化理解指数的生成和使用;三是做到评估主体的中立性与数据来源多样化;最后是要接受公众开放性审查和监督。未来我国法治指数评估实践将借鉴上述经验不断走向成熟和完善。
[Abstract]:The path selection of rule-of-law index evaluation needs to be perfected and innovated in combination with the practical experience of extra-territorial rule of law assessment. The evaluation of rule of law index is based on the "secondary analysis" of data information in different databases to measure the estimated value of a country's rule of law. Its internal logic is different from the path choice of domestic rule of law index evaluation. Through the analysis of the choice of WGI rule of law index evaluation path, it is found that the collection of data information, processing and even the publication and use of the rule of law evaluation results need to provide experience for China's rule of law index evaluation. First, we should consider the function of "reference" rather than "according to"; second, we should understand the generation and use of index in context; third, we should realize the neutrality of evaluation subject and the diversification of data source. Finally, it is open to public scrutiny and supervision. In the future, the practice of index evaluation of rule of law in our country will draw lessons from the above experience and continue to mature and perfect.
【作者单位】：中南财经政法大学;
【基金】：司法部国家法治与法学理论研究项目《法治指数及其中国应用研究》(14SFB2002)阶段性成果之一
【分类号】：D920.0

【参考文献】