日本专利权当然无效抗辩及其对我国的启示

发布时间：2018-05-21 02:17

本文选题：专利权无效抗辩 + 专利权当然无效抗辩　；参考：《华中科技大学》2012年硕士论文

【摘要】：专利制度采取职权分离原则的国家都面临一个共同的问题，即在专利民事侵权诉讼中，当被告主张专利无效抗辩时，需要向另一个专门机关启动专利确权程序，这导致专利民事侵权诉讼审判效率低和当事人诉累。与我国职权分离的模式最接近的日本，通过设立专利权当然无效抗辩来解决此问题。专利权当然无效抗辩是指在专利权民事侵权诉讼中，涉案专利权依照专利权无效宣告程序应当被宣告无效的，原告不能向对方行使其权利。本文尝试研究我国能否仿效日本专利权当然无效抗辩的做法，以提高我国专利侵权诉讼的审判效率和减轻当事人诉累。第一部分阐述专利权无效抗辩的内涵和基本问题；第二部分全面介绍日本专利权当然无效抗辩的含义、由来、立法意义、适用条件及其不足；第三部分阐述我国专利无效抗辩的概况，分析其存在的问题；第四部分通过对我国当前已有的改革思路进行评析、比较，说明我国现阶段引入专利权当然无效抗辩的必要性和可行性；第五部分提出在我国建构专利权当然无效抗辩的方案。本文研究的现实意义在于，从我国现有专利制度之内，探索现阶段我国可行的改革措施，以期有助于解决我国专利制度中职权分离原则的弊端，提高专利民事侵权诉讼的审判效率，促进我国专利制度的有效运行。
[Abstract]:Countries that adopt the principle of separation of powers and powers in the patent system are faced with a common problem, that is, in civil patent infringement proceedings, when the defendant claims that the patent is invalid, it is necessary to initiate a patent confirmation procedure with another specialized agency. This leads to low efficiency of patent tort litigation and litigants'tiredness. Japan, which is closest to China's mode of separation of powers, solves this problem by setting up an invalid defense of patent right. The defense of invalidity of patent right of course means that in the civil tort action of patent right, if the patent right involved should be declared invalid according to the procedure of declaring invalidation of patent right, the plaintiff cannot exercise its right to the other party. This paper attempts to study whether our country can follow the Japanese patent right as an invalid defense, in order to improve the efficiency of patent infringement litigation and alleviate the litigants' tiredness. The first part expounds the connotation and basic problems of patent invalidation defense, the second part introduces the meaning, origin, legislative significance, applicable conditions and deficiencies of Japanese patent right invalidity defense. The third part expounds the general situation of patent invalidation defense in our country, analyzes its existing problems, the fourth part analyzes and compares the existing reform ideas of our country. It explains the necessity and feasibility of introducing the defense of patent right in our country at present. The fifth part puts forward the scheme of constructing the defense of patent right in our country. The practical significance of this study lies in exploring the feasible reform measures of our country at present from within the existing patent system of our country, in order to help solve the malpractice of the principle of separation of authority in the patent system of our country. Improve the efficiency of patent tort litigation, promote the effective operation of China's patent system.
【学位授予单位】：华中科技大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D923.42

【相似文献】