法律语篇的批评性话语分析

发布时间：2018-05-28 00:44

本文选题：法律语篇 + 权力　；参考：《南京师范大学》2011年硕士论文

【摘要】：法律在现今社会中起着十分重要的作用。它规定了人们的行为,调整了不同阶级间的关系,并保障着公民的权利和国家的稳定。因此,法律具有权力。而法律的权力是通过语言来体现的,显然,法律语言也具有权力。然而,法律语言所具有的权力是隐含的。那么,法律语言是如何展现其权力的?语言与权力之间又有着怎样的关系?本文将就这些问题进行讨论。批评性话语分析认为整个世界是一种具有意识形态的社会结构,而批评性话语分析就致力于分析语言在应用的过程中是如何反映这种意识形态的。因此,本文试图从批评性话语分析的角度来分析法律语篇,从而揭示隐含在法律语言中的权力。作者运用费尔克劳夫的三维理论框架和韩礼德的系统功能语法理论从宏观和微观两个角度进行分析。作者首先在韩礼德的系统功能语法的基础上,对法律语篇的语言特征：词汇、情态和及物性进行了描述,并分析了在这一过程中权力意识是如何体现的。然后,作者又依据费尔克拉夫的三维理论框架,综合结合社会和历史条件来阐释法律语篇和社会结构间的关系。具体地说,就是社会结构是如何生成法律语篇,以及法律语篇对这些社会条件又会产生什么样的影响。作者认为法律语篇作为调整社会关系和保障社会秩序的手段就必然体现一定的权力意识。因此立法者或其他法律人士在制定或运用法律的时候,不仅要考虑到法律的权威性和强制性,还要兼顾被统治阶级的可承受性。
[Abstract]:Law plays a very important role in today's society. It regulates the behavior of people, adjusts the relations between different classes, and guarantees the rights of citizens and the stability of the country. Therefore, the law has power. The power of law is embodied by language. Obviously, legal language also has power. However, the power of legal language is implicit. So how does the legal language manifest its power? What is the relationship between language and power? These problems will be discussed in this paper. Critical discourse analysis holds that the whole world is an ideological social structure, and critical discourse analysis is devoted to analyzing how language reflects this ideology in the process of its application. Therefore, this paper attempts to analyze the legal discourse from the perspective of critical discourse analysis, thus revealing the power implied in the legal language. The author makes an analysis from macro and micro perspectives by using the framework of Faircroft's three dimensional theory and Halliday's theory of systemic functional grammar. On the basis of Halliday's systematic functional grammar, the author first describes the linguistic features of legal discourse: vocabulary, modality and transitivity, and analyzes how the consciousness of power is embodied in the process. Then, according to Felke Ralph's three-dimensional theoretical framework, the author combines the social and historical conditions to explain the relationship between legal discourse and social structure. Specifically, how the social structure produces legal discourse, and what kind of influence legal discourse will have on these social conditions. The author holds that legal discourse, as a means of regulating social relations and ensuring social order, must embody a certain sense of power. Therefore, legislators or other legal personages should not only consider the authority and compulsion of the law, but also the affordability of the ruling class when making or applying the law.
【学位授予单位】：南京师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D90-053

【参考文献】