当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 法理论文 >

《淮南子》法律思想研究

发布时间:2018-05-28 22:22

  本文选题:淮南子 +  ; 参考:《中南民族大学》2011年硕士论文


【摘要】:法律究竟是什么?古今中外的许多学者都从不同方面阐述了自己的观点。但即使如此,我们仍不能够断言已经通晓了法律的真谛。换言之,要想更全面、更深刻地理解法律,我们不能就法律而论法律,因为法律作为社会规范的一种,与其他社会规范紧密相连。也就是说,法律之外的诸多社会因素或许可以帮助我们更好地去探寻法律的本质。文化无疑为我们研究法律提供了独特的视角。由于法律是文化的重要组成部分,因此,任何一种法律都打上了一定文化的烙印,通过一定的文化,我们则能更好地去了解法律的形成、发展与变革。当下,我们正进行着“中国特色”的法治建设,自然不能脱离本民族文化这一“本土资源”,只有对其批判地继承,才可能制定出适合中国国情的法律制度,这对构建社会主义和谐社会具有重要意义。 淮南王刘安及其门客所著的《淮南子》一书,在总结秦亡的历史教训的基础上,对法家的思想进行批判和改造,同时又结合汉初的社会现实情况,以道家的清静无为为旗帜,兼采各家的学术思想,从而使其法律思想在中国思想史上独具特色。尤其是书中提出的“法籍礼义者,所以禁君,使无擅断也”的法律观对后世产生了深远的影响。本文从法律文化学的角度,通过研究其法律思想产生的时代背景,分析其法律思想的主要内容,以期客观地评价其法律思想的价值,探寻其法律思想的现代意义。 论文分为五个部分。第一部分,概述淮南王刘安的生平,介绍《淮南子》一书的时代背景,分析《淮南子》一书的学派归属。第二部分,叙述《淮南子》法律思想产生的理论基础,即黄老道家的“道”和“无为”。第三部分,详细介绍《淮南子》一书的法律思想,包括“发于人间”生于“仁义”的法律起源论,“顺势因时”的立法观,“精诚”、“无私”的执法观和“法籍礼义者,所以禁君,使无擅断也”的法律观。第四部分,对《淮南子》的法律思想做出评价,一方面总结其法律思想的进步之处,另一方面指出其法律思想的局限性,并从文化的角度探寻其原因。第五部分,论述《淮南子》法律思想的现代价值,通过找寻传统法律思想与现代法治理念之间的契合之处,说明《淮南子》法律思想对我国进行法治建设的重要意义。
[Abstract]:What is the law? Many scholars from all over the world have expounded their views from different aspects. But even so, we cannot claim to know the true meaning of the law. In other words, if we want to understand the law more comprehensively and deeply, we can't deal with law in terms of law, because law as a kind of social norm is closely linked with other social norms. In other words, social factors beyond the law may help us to better understand the nature of the law. Culture undoubtedly provides us with a unique perspective for the study of law. Since law is an important part of culture, any kind of law is branded with a certain culture. Through a certain culture, we can better understand the formation, development and reform of law. At present, we are carrying out the construction of the rule of law with "Chinese characteristics". Naturally, we cannot break away from our own national culture as a "local resource". Only by critically inheriting it, can we formulate a legal system suitable to China's national conditions. This is of great significance to the construction of a harmonious socialist society. On the basis of summing up the historical lessons of the death of Qin Dynasty, the book "Huainan Zi", written by Liu An, the Huainan King, and his entourage, criticized and reformed the thought of the Legalists, and at the same time combined with the social reality of the early Han Dynasty, they took the quiet and inaction of the Taoists as the banner. At the same time, different academic thoughts are adopted to make their legal thoughts unique in the history of Chinese thought. Especially in the book, the legal concept of "legal courtesy and righteousness, so that the monarch is forbidden, so that there is no arbitrary," has had a profound impact on later generations. From the point of view of legal culturology, this paper analyzes the main contents of his legal thought by studying the background of its legal thought, in order to objectively evaluate the value of his legal thought and explore the modern significance of his legal thought. The paper is divided into five parts. The first part summarizes the life of Huainan King Liu An, introduces the historical background of Huainan Zi, and analyzes the school ownership of Huainan Zi. The second part narrates the theoretical basis of the legal thought of Huainan Zi, that is, the Taoism and inaction of Huanglao Taoism. The third part introduces the legal thought of Huainan Zi in detail, including the legal origin theory of "born in the world", the legislative view of "due to the times", the "sincerity", the "selfless" view of law enforcement and the "French courtesy". Therefore, the prohibition of monarch, so that there is no arbitrary view of the law. In the fourth part, the author evaluates the legal thought of Huainan Zi. On the one hand, it summarizes the progress of its legal thought, on the other hand, it points out the limitation of its legal thought, and probes into its reasons from the angle of culture. In the fifth part, the author discusses the modern value of the legal thought of "Huainan Zi", and explains the important significance of the legal thought of "Huainan Zi" to the construction of the rule of law in our country by looking for the coincidence between the traditional legal thought and the modern idea of ruling by law.
【学位授予单位】:中南民族大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2011
【分类号】:D909.2

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 许抗生;;《淮南子》论“道”[J];安徽大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2007年04期

2 于欣;;《淮南子》“德”范畴之意蕴探析[J];长春工业大学学报(社会科学版);2007年03期

3 关志国;;试论黄老学的“道”、“德”与“法”[J];船山学刊;2008年02期

4 李秀华;;《淮南子》的和谐思想及其启示[J];大庆师范学院学报;2009年05期

5 郝荣;;谈“一国两制”的意义[J];法制与社会;2009年16期

6 池海平;论法律至上[J];河北法学;2002年03期

7 周黎明;;浅析法治的要义——解读亚里士多德《政治学》[J];黄石教育学院学报;2005年03期

8 张德广,程文琴;简论淮南王刘安法哲学思想[J];广西社会科学;2004年08期

9 戴黍;;试析《淮南子》所述的“法”[J];淮南师范学院学报;2008年01期

10 戴黍;“因循”与“治道”——《淮南子》中“因”的四重涵义[J];江淮论坛;2005年05期

相关博士学位论文 前4条

1 孙纪文;《淮南子》研究[D];福建师范大学;2004年

2 王雪;《淮南子》哲学思想研究[D];西北大学;2005年

3 石先钰;法官道德建设研究[D];华中师范大学;2006年

4 刘爱敏;《淮南子》道论探微[D];山东大学;2006年

相关硕士学位论文 前4条

1 王宇;古希腊“法律至上”观念的生成及意义[D];西南政法大学;2005年

2 李孝东;宽严相济刑事政策若干问题研究[D];吉林大学;2007年

3 李卿;当代中国法官职业道德研究[D];河北师范大学;2007年

4 杨栋;二十世纪《淮南子》研究[D];东北师范大学;2007年



本文编号:1948408

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/falilunwen/1948408.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户6c2dd***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com