法律商谈理论视野下的法律论证

发布时间：2018-05-31 02:28

本文选题：法律论证 + 法律商谈理论　；参考：《西南政法大学》2012年硕士论文

【摘要】：法律论证是法律逻辑学的一个重要分支。我国的法律论证理论研究现在多局限于传统形式逻辑视角之下。毋庸置疑，传统形式逻辑视角是法律论证理论研究的基础。但是其也具有一定的局限性。它虽然很好地解决了法律论证的形式合法性问题，不仅强调前提—法律规则的权威性，还能为结论—司法裁决提供一种强有力的说服力。但是，它只是一种规则主导之下的法律论证，强调结论的合法性，而这种合法性却牺牲了对法律体系之外的正当性的考虑。为了弥补传统法律论证只重形式不重实质的缺陷，，笔者引入了法律商谈理论,并在总结法律商谈理论的基础上提出了一个法律商谈论证的基本构架，并初步探索了其在司法审判中的应用之道，以期对我国的司法审判实践有所助益。本文主要从以下四个部分来展开论述：第一部分：法律论证理论研究之传统视角本部分首先简单介绍了传统法律论证研究状况，肯定传统法律论证理论的作用，同时也指出其存在一定的局限性，在此基础之上指出当下法律论证研究正在从传统形式逻辑视角向非形式逻辑视角转变。第二部分：法律论证理论研究的新视角本部分把法律论证理论研究的视角引入到法律商谈理论视野下。把法律商谈理论分为理想条件下的法律商谈理论和限定条件下的法律商谈理论，并分别对其进行了详细的介绍。然后对法律商谈理论进行综合评价并指出其对法律论证理论研究的意义。第三部分：法律商谈论证的构架本部分结合第二部分的法律商谈理论，在总结借鉴法律商谈理论的基础上提出了一个法律商谈论证的基本构架。并分别从内涵、特征、评价标准、规则和程序这几个方面来具体阐释法律商谈论证的构架。第四部分：法律商谈论证在司法审判中的应用之初探本部分试图将法律商谈论证之方法运用于司法审判之中，探寻法律商谈论证与司法审判的契合之道并试图为司法审判实践探索出一种与司法三段论不同的法律论证模式。
[Abstract]:Legal argumentation is an important branch of legal logic. The theoretical research of legal argumentation in our country is now confined to the traditional formal logic perspective. There is no doubt that the traditional formal logic perspective is the basis of the theoretical study of legal argumentation. But it also has some limitations. Although it solves the problem of formal legality of legal argumentation, it not only emphasizes the authority of premise-legal rules, but also provides a powerful persuasion for conclusion-judicial decision. However, it is only a legal argument under the rule of law, emphasizing the legitimacy of the conclusion, which sacrifices the consideration of legitimacy outside the legal system. In order to remedy the defects of traditional legal argumentation, the author introduces the theory of legal negotiation, and puts forward a basic framework of legal negotiation on the basis of summing up the theory of legal negotiation. It also explores its application in judicial trial so as to be helpful to the judicial practice in our country. This paper mainly discusses from the following four parts: The first part: the traditional angle of view of the theoretical research of legal argumentation This part firstly introduces the research situation of traditional legal argumentation, affirms the function of traditional legal argumentation theory, and points out its limitations. On this basis, it is pointed out that the current legal argumentation is changing from the traditional formal logic perspective to the non-formal logic perspective. The second part: a new angle of view for the study of the theory of legal argumentation This part introduces the theory of legal argumentation into the perspective of legal negotiation theory. The legal negotiation theory is divided into ideal legal negotiation theory and limited legal negotiation theory. Then it evaluates the theory of legal negotiation and points out its significance to the research of legal argumentation theory. The third part: the framework of legal negotiation argumentation Based on the theory of legal negotiation in the second part, this part puts forward a basic framework of legal negotiation argumentation on the basis of summing up and drawing lessons from the theory of legal negotiation. The framework of legal negotiation and argumentation is explained from the aspects of connotation, characteristics, evaluation criteria, rules and procedures. The fourth part: the Application of legal negotiation and argumentation in Judicial trial This part attempts to apply the method of legal negotiation argumentation to judicial trial, to explore the agreement between legal negotiation argumentation and judicial trial, and to explore a different legal argumentation model from judicial syllogism for judicial trial practice.
【学位授予单位】：西南政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D90-051

【参考文献】