“一带一路”倡议中的法律移植——以美国两次“法律与发展运动”为镜鉴

发布时间：2018-06-09 06:04

本文选题：一带一路 + 法律移植　；参考：《清华法学》2017年01期

【摘要】：在"一带一路"倡议的战略构想中,法律发挥重要作用。从比较法角度,叙述美国20世纪先后两次开展的"法律与发展运动"的经验和教训,对我国的法律域外发展不无借鉴意义。本文通过比较,指出两种全球法律移植安排之间存在三点相似性和四点差异性。其相似性为,两种战略都是在经济上的强势国家主导,都带有法律内容,都正在或即将迎来批判和检验;其差异性在于,中美两国的历史处境和国际地位不同,法律现代化的成熟程度不同,所涉及法律文化的复杂性不同,既有经验和理论预设不同。基于此,在"一带一路"的法律移植中,我国应回答五个相关核心问题,并避免线性法律与发展观,法律工具主义观,隐性殖民主义观,"中国模式"完美论和万能论及法律移植的意识形态观五个观念陷阱。"一带一路"倡议为我国比较法学的发展提供了历史机遇,我国比较法学研究应突破传统"中—西"二元对立的比较格局,突破过去以概念比较和功能比较为主要方法的方法论体系,有意识地革新比较法教学体系,为中国法的全球化提供战略储备人才。
[Abstract]:The law plays an important role in the strategic vision of the Belt and Road initiative. From the perspective of comparative law, this paper describes the experiences and lessons of the "Law and Development Movement" carried out by the United States two times in the 20th century, which is of great significance to the extraterritorial development of our country's laws. This paper points out that there are three similarities and four differences between the two global legal transplant arrangements. The similarities are that the two strategies are dominated by strong countries in economic terms, both have legal content, are being or will soon be criticized and tested, and the difference lies in the fact that the historical situation and international status of China and the United States are different. The maturity of legal modernization is different, the complexity of legal culture is different, and the experience and theoretical presupposition are different. Based on this, in the legal transplant of "Belt and Road", our country should answer five relevant core questions, and avoid linear law and development view, legal instrumentalism view. There are five pitfalls in the concept of recessive colonialism, the perfect theory of the Chinese model and the ideological view of omnipotence and the transplantation of law. " The "Belt and Road" initiative provides a historical opportunity for the development of comparative law in China. This paper breaks through the methodology system of concept comparison and function comparison in the past, innovates the teaching system of comparative law consciously, and provides strategic reserve talents for the globalization of Chinese law.
【作者单位】：清华大学法学院;
【分类号】：D971.2;DD912.29

【相似文献】