当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 法理论文 >

明清时期地权秩序的构造及其启示

发布时间:2018-06-27 11:42

  本文选题:管业秩序 + 地权分化 ; 参考:《法学研究》2017年05期


【摘要】:明清时期的地权秩序表现为受制于国家政治权力的宏观地权秩序与乡土社会原生自发形成的微观地权秩序的二元结构。民间地权秩序以"业"为核心概念,以私人契约为工具,分化为永佃、一田二主、典制等多样态的管业层级以及典卖、活卖、绝卖等一系列交易形态。诸管业层级根据经营收益、流通性、管业年限与税赋风险等四种影响因子,体现为不同的权利内容与地权价值。诸地权交易类型以当前收益与未来收益两个维度构建起统一的交易链条与理论框架。民间自发的地权分化所催生的复杂地权结构起到了明晰产权与降低交易成本的积极功效,其成因根植于明清社会经济的变迁之中。明清时期地权秩序呈现出来的抽象和相对性观念、时间维度上的灵活性特征,不同于大陆法系以绝对所有权为中心的物权观念以及"所有权—他物权"结构,这一观察对我国农地"三权分置"改革颇具启发意义。
[Abstract]:The order of land rights in the Ming and Qing dynasties was the dual structure of the macro-order of land rights which was restricted by the political power of the state and the micro-order of land rights formed spontaneously by the native society. The order of civil land rights takes "industry" as the core concept and private contract as the tool. It is divided into permanent tenancy, one field and two owners, the canonical system and so on, and a series of transaction forms such as classic sale, live sale, absolute sale and so on. According to the operating income, circulation, the number of years of management and tax risk, the four influencing factors are different content of rights and value of land rights. The transaction types of land rights construct a unified transaction chain and theoretical framework based on the two dimensions of current income and future income. The complex structure of land ownership caused by the spontaneous division of land rights played a positive role in clarifying property rights and reducing transaction costs, and its causes were rooted in the social and economic changes of Ming and Qing dynasties. In the Ming and Qing dynasties, the concept of abstraction and relativity in the order of land rights, and the characteristics of flexibility in the dimension of time, are different from the concept of real right centered on absolute ownership in the continental law system and the structure of "ownership-other real right". This observation is instructive to the reform of the three-power division of farmland in our country.
【作者单位】: 清华大学法学院;
【基金】:国家社科基金青年项目(16CFX033) 清华大学自主科研计划课题(2015THZ0)的阶段性成果
【分类号】:D929

【相似文献】

相关期刊论文 前6条

1 吴向红;;典制中成文法和习惯法的整合[J];法商研究;2007年04期

2 吴秉坤;;典制的借债担保渊源——以民国时期徽州借贷契约为案例[J];合肥学院学报(社会科学版);2012年03期

3 余煜刚;;传统典制在民国民法中的重述:结构、要素与话语[J];研究生法学;2012年01期

4 瞿见;;清中后期黔东南文斗寨苗族典制研究[J];民间法;2012年00期

5 吴秉坤;;典制的完整形态——清至民国徽州典契研究[J];淮北师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2011年05期

6 邹亚莎;;从典制到典权的基本定型——民初大理院对传统典制的近代化改造[J];社会科学家;2014年08期

相关硕士学位论文 前1条

1 赵楠楠;清代田宅典契初步研究[D];中国政法大学;2010年



本文编号:2073807

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/falilunwen/2073807.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户54bcd***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com