当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 法理论文 >

试论南京国民政府时期的公证制度

发布时间:2018-07-07 22:20

  本文选题:私证 + 中人 ; 参考:《西南政法大学》2012年硕士论文


【摘要】:公证,,是与私证相对而言的。公证是由国家公证机关作证明,私证则是私人作见证人,二者的效力和权威自然有别。在人类社会漫长的历史上,私证已有几千年的历史,至今尚在民间广泛流行。 私证在历史上有过一定的作用,但毕竟是有缺陷的。有些见证人不懂法律,加上封建思想作怪,往往参与证明违法契约而不自知。私证在很多情况下难以保护当事人的合法权益,起不到预防纠纷的作用,何况有的中人还因某些原因不“居中”反偏私,故而“中证”不一定公正,另外由于人还受到寿命的限制,一些远年契约闹纠纷时,见证人多已去世,使之成为“死无对证”,这些都是私证无法克服的缺陷。 鉴于私证的许多不足之处,现今世界各国都先后实行公证制度。公证由国家公证机关作出证明,公证机关代表国家行使公证权,其他国家机关则不具有这种功能。特别是关于涉外的证明,国外有关机关只认出证国公证机构的印章,没有经过公证的有关文件,就不能在域外发生法律效力。它并不像私证一样,当事人想办什么就证明什么,它既要根据当事人的申请,由当事人提出相关证据说明,又要根据国家的法律规定,依照法定程序办理具体的公证事项。最后,办理公证是极为严肃认真的,为审查申请公证的法律行为、文书和事实是否真实、合法,必要时还要进行调查,以便弄清有关情况。 从南京国民政府时期开始,我国有了真正意义上的公证法,其制订在效仿西方先进法律制度规定的同时,还融合了我国自己的特色。此制度的推行,有效维护了当时的社会安定,尤其是在抗日战争的大形势之下,为稳定战时大后方的秩序做了巨大贡献。本文试从南京国民政府时期公证法规的内容、原则等各方面分析,结合一些案例,对国民政府时期推行公证制度的一些可行性做法进行探讨。 公证制度是国家的一项重要的法律制度。创立这一制度的目的在于预防纠纷,减少诉讼,促进经济和社会的交往,保护当事人的合法权益。因此,近代各国都十分注意运用公证制度维护经济和社会秩序。一个国家公证制度的健全与否和实施应用情况,直接关系到社会和经济的稳定状况。我国是社会主义国家,应该更加注重运用公证制度来维护经济和社会秩序,维护国家、集体的利益和公民的合法权益。所以,对南京国民政府时期公证制度及其具体实施中的优异之处进行学习和借鉴,意义重大。
[Abstract]:Notarization is relative to private attestation. Notarization is certified by the national notary office, and private certificate is private witness. The effectiveness and authority of the two are naturally different. In the long history of human society, private testimony has a history of several thousand years, and is still popular among the people. Private evidence has played a role in history, but it is flawed after all. Some witnesses do not understand the law, coupled with feudal ideas, often involved in proving illegal contracts without knowing. In many cases, it is difficult to protect the legitimate rights and interests of the parties concerned, and it does not play a role in preventing disputes. Moreover, some Chinese people do not "center" or bias against private interests for some reasons, so "Chinese certificates" are not necessarily fair. In addition, due to the limitation of life span, most of the witnesses have passed away, which makes them become "dead without proof". These are the defects that can not be overcome by private evidence. In view of the many shortcomings of private certificates, countries in the world have implemented the system of notarization successively. Notarization is certified by the national notary organ, which exercises notarization power on behalf of the state, but other state organs do not have this function. Especially with regard to the proof concerning foreign affairs, the relevant foreign authorities only recognize the seal of the notarization agency of the certifying state, and without the relevant notarized documents, they cannot have the legal effect outside the territory. It is not like private evidence, the parties want to do anything to prove what, it should be based on the application of the parties, by the parties to put forward relevant evidence to explain, but also according to the laws of the country, in accordance with the legal procedures to deal with specific notarization matters. Finally, notarization is very serious, in order to examine the legal act of applying for notarization, the documents and facts are true and legal, and if necessary, an investigation should be carried out in order to ascertain the relevant circumstances. Since the period of Nanjing National Government, our country has had the notarization law in the true sense, its formulation not only imitates the western advanced legal system stipulation, but also merges our own characteristic. The implementation of this system effectively maintained the social stability at that time, especially under the great situation of the War of Resistance against Japan, and made great contributions to the stability of the order in the rear area during the war of war. This paper tries to analyze the contents and principles of the notarization laws and regulations of the Nanjing National Government, and discusses some feasible ways of carrying out the notarization system in the period of the Nanjing National Government in the light of some cases. Notarization system is an important legal system of the country. The purpose of this system is to prevent disputes, reduce litigation, promote economic and social exchanges, and protect the legitimate rights and interests of the parties. Therefore, modern countries pay great attention to the use of notarization system to maintain economic and social order. Whether a country's notarization system is sound or not and its application is directly related to the social and economic stability. As a socialist country, China should pay more attention to the use of notarization system to maintain economic and social order, to safeguard the national and collective interests and the legitimate rights and interests of citizens. Therefore, it is of great significance to study and learn from the notarization system of Nanjing National Government and its specific implementation.
【学位授予单位】:西南政法大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2012
【分类号】:D929

【共引文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 程宗璋;完善我国夫妻财产制的立法思考[J];保山师专学报;2000年01期

2 邱宁;;试论中国公证体制改革[J];重庆工学院学报(社会科学版);2009年03期

3 谢冬慧;;南京国民政府时期刑事审判制度述论[J];朝阳法律评论;2009年02期

4 李婷婷;李丹;;论公证法的性质[J];当代经理人;2005年04期

5 张志明;也谈公证债权文书的强制执行效力[J];中国司法;2001年10期

6 郭光东;谁是房地产市场的发言人?——由上海、巴黎两则房价新闻想到的[J];中国司法;2002年04期

7 叶俊寅 ,刘颖;谈股东大会之公证[J];中国司法;2002年10期

8 陈梅英;提存公证若干问题探讨[J];中国司法;2004年05期

9 刘疆;;具有强制执行效力公证书的不可诉问题研究——兼析《公证法》第三十七条和第四十条的适用[J];中国司法;2008年09期

10 潘秀丽;;证据保全公证若干争议问题探讨[J];中国司法;2009年08期

相关博士学位论文 前7条

1 高汉成;签注视野下的大清刑律草案研究[D];中国政法大学;2005年

2 袁兆春;孔氏家族宗族法及其法定特权研究[D];华东政法学院;2005年

3 孙红梅;公证—一种预防性的法律证明制度[D];吉林大学;2007年

4 许少波;民事证据保全制度研究[D];南京师范大学;2008年

5 蒋冬梅;杀人者死的中国传统观念及其实践研究[D];华东政法大学;2008年

6 王静;中国古代道德法律化研究[D];河北大学;2008年

7 胡峻;近代中国司法官考试研究[D];西南政法大学;2011年

相关硕士学位论文 前10条

1 徐驰;互联网信息发布与现有技术的认定[D];中国政法大学;2010年

2 胡永刚;公证过程中的事实认定[D];山东大学;2010年

3 吴奕晗;论公证赔偿制度[D];中国政法大学;2011年

4 刘雄涛;清代“教唆词讼”律文及其在司法中的适用[D];中央民族大学;2011年

5 高鸣;清代家族内民事纠纷及其解决[D];海南大学;2011年

6 陆志刚;中国公证制度中程序问题与责任问题研究[D];复旦大学;2010年

7 俞彦超;论公证人民事责任制度[D];复旦大学;2010年

8 王婷;论电子证据的保全[D];西南政法大学;2011年

9 赵婷;容隐制度探析[D];山东大学;2011年

10 谢群;我国公证员法律制度研究[D];黑龙江大学;2011年



本文编号:2106461

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/falilunwen/2106461.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户94b7b***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com