论民间规范与地方立法的冲突及协调

发布时间：2018-07-15 17:36

【摘要】：民间规范与地方立法的冲突主要表现为实体正义与程序正义的冲突、礼治秩序与法治秩序的冲突、社会效果与法律效果的冲突、顺从民意与服从立法的冲突。民间规范与地方立法之所以会产生冲突,主要是因为民间规范在特质上与地方立法存在差异。这些差异主要有:在历史起源上,民间规范更具有社会性,而地方立法更具有国家性;在适用范围上,民间规范更具有特定性,而地方立法更具有普遍性;在强制措施上,民间规范更具有内在性,而地方立法更具有外在性。明确了民间规范与地方立法冲突的主要表现和产生的根源,可以从法律文化整合、法律秩序融合、功能边界划定、双重权威明确、成本收益比较等方面寻找民间规范与地方立法冲突消解和协调的路径。
[Abstract]:The conflicts between folk norms and local legislation are mainly the conflict between substantive justice and procedural justice, the conflict between the order of rule of etiquette and the order of rule by law, the conflict between social effect and legal effect, and the conflict between obedience to public opinion and subordinate legislation. The conflict between folk norms and local legislations is mainly due to the differences between folk norms and local legislations. These differences include: in the historical origin, folk norms are more social, while local legislation is more national; in the scope of application, folk norms are more specific, and local legislation is more universal; in coercive measures, Folk norms are more intrinsic, while local legislation is more extrinsic. The main manifestation and origin of the conflict between folk norms and local legislation are clarified, which can be attributed to the integration of legal culture, the fusion of legal order, the delineation of functional boundaries, and the clarification of dual authority. The cost-benefit comparison and so on seeks the folk norm and the local legislation conflict resolution and the coordination path.
【作者单位】：广东外语外贸大学广州市绿色经济与环境能源法研究中心;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金重大项目《民间规范与地方立法研究》(批准号:16ZDA069)
【分类号】：D920.4

【相似文献】