司法判决可接受性的法理思考
发布时间：2018-08-04 16:25
【摘要】：作为司法机关依法对案件实体部分作出的法律判断,判决结果能否得到判决受众的接受是衡量司法判决质量的重要标准,而判决受众主要包括法律职业共同体、当事人和社会公众。司法领域“唯一正解”命题的破产凸显了司法共识在纠纷解决过程中的关键作用,司法判决在司法共识逻辑起点的基础上才能导向案结事了的实践终点。在权威维度向社会维度转向的过程中,‘个人因素在法哲学领域不断得到彰显,并在立法、司法与个人的关系演进过程中得以体现。新修辞学法学促进了判决可接受性标准的确立,并分别将听众理论和修辞论证作为分析框架和实现方式。司法判决可接受性理念要求法官采取实用主义审判方式,进行后果主义推理,奉行价值多元主义。在实体层面,司法判决向可接受性的趋近需要在判决事实、判决理由和判决论证三个方面作出努力。在程序层面,司法判决向可接受性的趋近需要在权能配置、受众监督和程序说理三个方面进行完善。司法与民意的关系问题一直都是学界和司法界面临的一个重大难题,司法民主化理论为这一问题的解决提供了较为明晰的努力方向。
[Abstract]:As the legal judgment made by the judicial organs on the substantive part of the case according to law, whether the judgment result can be accepted by the judgment audience is an important criterion to measure the quality of the judicial judgment, and the judgment audience mainly includes the legal professional community. The parties and the public. The bankruptcy of the proposition of "only positive solution" in the judicial field highlights the key role of judicial consensus in the process of dispute resolution. Judicial decision can lead to the end of the case on the basis of the logical starting point of judicial consensus. In the process of turning from the authority dimension to the social dimension, the personal factor is constantly displayed in the field of legal philosophy, and is reflected in the evolution of the relationship between the legislation, the judiciary and the individual. The new rhetoric law promotes the establishment of the criterion of admissibility of judgment, and takes the theory of audience and the rhetorical argumentation as the analytical framework and the way of realization respectively. The concept of acceptability of judicial decision requires judges to adopt pragmatic trial mode, to carry out consequence reasoning and to pursue value pluralism. At the substantive level, the approach of judicial decision to acceptability needs to make efforts in three aspects: the fact of judgment, the reason of judgment and the proof of judgment. At the procedural level, the approach of judicial decision to acceptability needs to be perfected in three aspects: power allocation, audience supervision and procedural reasoning. The relationship between justice and public opinion has always been a major problem faced by scholars and judicial circles. The theory of judicial democratization provides a clear direction for the solution of this problem.
【学位授予单位】：南京师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：D90-055
本文编号：2164442
[Abstract]:As the legal judgment made by the judicial organs on the substantive part of the case according to law, whether the judgment result can be accepted by the judgment audience is an important criterion to measure the quality of the judicial judgment, and the judgment audience mainly includes the legal professional community. The parties and the public. The bankruptcy of the proposition of "only positive solution" in the judicial field highlights the key role of judicial consensus in the process of dispute resolution. Judicial decision can lead to the end of the case on the basis of the logical starting point of judicial consensus. In the process of turning from the authority dimension to the social dimension, the personal factor is constantly displayed in the field of legal philosophy, and is reflected in the evolution of the relationship between the legislation, the judiciary and the individual. The new rhetoric law promotes the establishment of the criterion of admissibility of judgment, and takes the theory of audience and the rhetorical argumentation as the analytical framework and the way of realization respectively. The concept of acceptability of judicial decision requires judges to adopt pragmatic trial mode, to carry out consequence reasoning and to pursue value pluralism. At the substantive level, the approach of judicial decision to acceptability needs to make efforts in three aspects: the fact of judgment, the reason of judgment and the proof of judgment. At the procedural level, the approach of judicial decision to acceptability needs to be perfected in three aspects: power allocation, audience supervision and procedural reasoning. The relationship between justice and public opinion has always been a major problem faced by scholars and judicial circles. The theory of judicial democratization provides a clear direction for the solution of this problem.
【学位授予单位】：南京师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：D90-055
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前2条
1 孙光宁;武兴伟;;民法解释的特征及其运作[J];湖北社会科学;2008年10期
2 陈林林;;基于法律原则的裁判[J];法学研究;2006年03期
相关博士学位论文 前2条
1 孙光宁;可接受性：法律方法的一个分析视角[D];山东大学;2010年
2 陈金木;判决可接受性的实证研究[D];中国政法大学;2006年
相关硕士学位论文 前2条
1 鲍然;论司法判决的可接受性[D];西南政法大学;2011年
2 刘蕾;论判决的可接受性[D];厦门大学;2008年
，本文编号：2164442
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/falilunwen/2164442.html
