论我国立法听证参加人制度
发布时间：2018-08-07 18:04
【摘要】：立法听证制度是近年来我国立法领域备受关注的移植法律制度,地方人大常委会和政府在立法听证制度上的积极探索有力地推动了国家权力机关立法民主化的步伐。2000年颁布实施的《中华人民共和国立法法》明文规定了全国人大常委会和国务院在立法过程中可以采用立法听证会的形式听取各方意见,但是在立法听证规则方面缺乏全国性的统一规定,各地自主制定的立法听证规则较为粗糙且在相关制度上规定各异,全国性的立法听证会实践经验仅有一次,即2005年举办的关于个人所得税工薪所得减除费用标准的立法听证会；地方性的立法听证会实践经验较多,但是听证会的质量差距较大,对个案的研究状况也参差不齐。国内对于行政听证制度研究较多,对价格听证和立法听证的研究较少。在立法听证制度研究中,专门针对立法听证参加人的也不多。 第一章从对立法听证参加人制度的基本理论研究出发,分析了立法听证与座谈会及听证会的区别,指出现在立法听证法律依据的模糊性状况。现行制度和理论界对于立法听证参加人的称谓、外延界定方面都有分歧,本文将听证人、听证会主持人、听证陈述人及其代理人和旁听人列入研究范畴,并对立法听证参加人制度设置的意义进行了介绍和分析。 第二章对立法听证规则立法现状进行分析后提出统一明确和规范立法听证的法律依据,并对立法听证人和主持人的合理确定提出建议。 第三章重在分析立法听证陈述人和旁听人制度的完善,其中对于听证陈述人、旁听人的遴选机制、权利和义务进行逐个分析,并对听证代理人制度和专家陈述人制度等特殊制度进行阐述。通过对已经进行的听证会实例和有关地方立法听证规则文本的分析,初步梳理出存在的问题,并提出一些有针对性的完善之策。 第四章对于听证参加人参与程序过程中遇到的实际问题进行补充分析,包括听证告知制度的完善、听证发言制度的完善、听证辩论制度和听证结果四个版块。
[Abstract]:The legislative hearing system is a transplant legal system which has attracted much attention in the field of legislation in China in recent years. The active exploration by the standing Committee of the local people's Congress and the government on the system of legislative hearing has powerfully promoted the pace of democratization of the legislation of the state power organs. The Legislative Law of the people's Republic of China promulgated and implemented in 2000 clearly stipulated the people of the whole country. During the legislative process, the NPC standing Committee and the State Council may listen to the views of all parties in the form of legislative hearings. However, there is a lack of a unified national regulation on the rules of legislative hearing, and the rules of legislative hearings formulated by various localities are relatively rough and different in relevant systems. The practice experience of national legislative hearings is only one time. That is, the legislative hearing on the standard of personal income tax income deducting expenses held in 2005; the practice experience of local legislative hearing is more, but the quality gap of the hearing is large, and the research status of individual cases is also uneven. There are more researches on administrative hearing system, less on price hearing and legislative hearing. In the research of legislative hearing system, there are not many people who take part in the legislative hearing. The first chapter analyzes the difference between the legislative hearing and the forum and the hearing, and points out the fuzziness of the legal basis of the legislative hearing from the basic theoretical research on the system of the participants in the legislative hearing. The current system and the theoretical circle have different opinions on the appellation and extension of the participants in the legislative hearings. In this paper, the authors of the hearings, the presenters of the hearings and their agents and observers are included in the scope of the research. The significance of setting up the system of participants in the legislative hearing is also introduced and analyzed. The second chapter analyzes the legislative status quo of the legislative hearing rules, and puts forward the legal basis of unified, clear and standardized legislative hearing, and puts forward some suggestions for the reasonable determination of the legislative hearing person and the moderator. The third chapter focuses on the analysis of the perfection of the system of the speaker and the narrator of the legislative hearing, in which the selection mechanism, rights and obligations of the speaker of the hearing and the observer are analyzed one by one. And the hearing agent system and expert statement system and other special systems are elaborated. Through the analysis of the examples of the hearings and the texts of the hearing rules of the local legislation, this paper preliminarily combs out the existing problems and puts forward some pertinent and perfect measures. The fourth chapter makes supplementary analysis on the practical problems encountered in the process of participants' participation in the hearing, including the perfection of the hearing notification system, the hearing speech system, the hearing debate system and the hearing results.
【学位授予单位】：华东师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D920.0
本文编号：2170885
[Abstract]:The legislative hearing system is a transplant legal system which has attracted much attention in the field of legislation in China in recent years. The active exploration by the standing Committee of the local people's Congress and the government on the system of legislative hearing has powerfully promoted the pace of democratization of the legislation of the state power organs. The Legislative Law of the people's Republic of China promulgated and implemented in 2000 clearly stipulated the people of the whole country. During the legislative process, the NPC standing Committee and the State Council may listen to the views of all parties in the form of legislative hearings. However, there is a lack of a unified national regulation on the rules of legislative hearing, and the rules of legislative hearings formulated by various localities are relatively rough and different in relevant systems. The practice experience of national legislative hearings is only one time. That is, the legislative hearing on the standard of personal income tax income deducting expenses held in 2005; the practice experience of local legislative hearing is more, but the quality gap of the hearing is large, and the research status of individual cases is also uneven. There are more researches on administrative hearing system, less on price hearing and legislative hearing. In the research of legislative hearing system, there are not many people who take part in the legislative hearing. The first chapter analyzes the difference between the legislative hearing and the forum and the hearing, and points out the fuzziness of the legal basis of the legislative hearing from the basic theoretical research on the system of the participants in the legislative hearing. The current system and the theoretical circle have different opinions on the appellation and extension of the participants in the legislative hearings. In this paper, the authors of the hearings, the presenters of the hearings and their agents and observers are included in the scope of the research. The significance of setting up the system of participants in the legislative hearing is also introduced and analyzed. The second chapter analyzes the legislative status quo of the legislative hearing rules, and puts forward the legal basis of unified, clear and standardized legislative hearing, and puts forward some suggestions for the reasonable determination of the legislative hearing person and the moderator. The third chapter focuses on the analysis of the perfection of the system of the speaker and the narrator of the legislative hearing, in which the selection mechanism, rights and obligations of the speaker of the hearing and the observer are analyzed one by one. And the hearing agent system and expert statement system and other special systems are elaborated. Through the analysis of the examples of the hearings and the texts of the hearing rules of the local legislation, this paper preliminarily combs out the existing problems and puts forward some pertinent and perfect measures. The fourth chapter makes supplementary analysis on the practical problems encountered in the process of participants' participation in the hearing, including the perfection of the hearing notification system, the hearing speech system, the hearing debate system and the hearing results.
【学位授予单位】：华东师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D920.0
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前9条
1 汪全胜;立法听证初论[J];法学杂志;2002年04期
2 周佑勇,余睿;论听证参加人及其法律地位[J];淮阴师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版);2004年06期
3 湖北地方立法研究中心课题组;;农民参与地方立法现状的个案调研[J];江汉论坛;2006年01期
4 陈家刚;程序民主的实践——中国地方立法听证规则的比较研究[J];南京社会科学;2004年03期
5 邓云秀;关于海南地方立法听证的几点思考[J];海南人大;2005年05期
6 许华,王邺;立法听证制度初探[J];人大研究;2002年04期
7 黎赐锦,郑毅生,汤黎明;地方人大及其常委会听证制度研究[J];人大研究;2003年12期
8 徐琳;;中国立法听证制度在实践中的困难探析[J];社会科学家;2010年04期
9 刘飞宇;论听证当事人[J];中共浙江省委党校学报;2002年03期
相关硕士学位论文 前6条
1 王轶;我国立法听证参加人制度研究[D];吉林大学;2011年
2 王永刚;我国立法听证参加人制度研究[D];华东政法学院;2006年
3 张家炯;我国地方立法听证探析[D];苏州大学;2006年
4 单于广;立法听证制度研究[D];中国政法大学;2007年
5 于明霞;我国地方政府立法听证分析[D];中国海洋大学;2008年
6 刘凌;我国立法听证参加人制度研究[D];西南交通大学;2009年
，本文编号：2170885
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/falilunwen/2170885.html
