浅议麦考密克的制度法理论
发布时间：2018-08-08 11:44
【摘要】：制度法学是英国法学家尼尔·麦考密克和奥地利法学家奥塔·魏因贝格尔共同创立的法学理论,本文着重介绍的是麦考密克的制度法理论。制度法理论通过制度道德理论将部分道德原则纳入到了法律的范畴、通过制度事实理论融合了法律规范性与现实性之间的鸿沟,颇具创新精神。本文主要以分析实证主义的分离命题和社会事实命题为视角,梳理制度法理论构建的背景及其理论框架,并在此基础上对制度法理论的学术价值给予客观评价。文章将按照以下框架展开论述: 导言:通过文章的写作动机引入文章的主题,然后简略介绍制度法学的基本情况和目前国内学界的研究现状,进而提出本文的写作目标和写作方法。 第一章:梳理分析制度法理论产生的背景和原因。麦考密克制度法理论的产生绝非偶然,这与当时的学术争论焦点和学术时代背景密不可分。从直接原因来看,制度法理论的产生缘起于规范主义和反规范主义之争。制度法理论试图通过“法是一种制度事实”的理论构建,融合法律的规范性面向和社会现实性面向,使规范性理论取得社会现实性的发展。但从更深一层的原因来看,制度法理论的产生仍然是由于分析实证主义的两大基本命题遭遇到了德沃金的猛烈攻击。需要有一种理论来改良分离命题和社会事实命题,以重新巩固分析实证的基本立场。 第二章:以分析实证主义基本命题为视角对麦考密克的制度法理论进行重构式介绍。制度道德理论和制度事实理论是麦考密克制度法理论的两大核心,第二章介绍的是与分离命题相关联的制度道德理论。文章首先阐述了麦考密克对德沃金理论框架的质疑,提出必须界定一种不依赖于道德价值的“制度”方可说明制度道德的形成。而这种制度其实是法律规则和法律原则的统一体。其次,通过实践理性说明承认规则是如何将制度道德纳入到法律的范畴中成为法律原则的。再次,证明制度道德理论仍然坚持法律与道德逻辑上相分离的结论,坚守分离命题。 第三章:介绍与社会事实命题联系紧密的制度事实理论。制度事实理论认为,法不仅在哲学意义上是一种制度体系,同时在社会学上也是一种制度现实。法这两方面的特性紧密结合且不可分割。制度事实理论不仅强调了法是一种社会事实,更进一步明确了法是一种制度性事实。这也捍卫和拓展了社会事实命题。 第四章:在确认制度法理论分析实证立场的前提下,通过横向比较阐述其在新分析法学范围内的理论价值,通过纵向比较阐述其在分析实证主义法学范围内的理论价值。在新分析法学的范围内,与拉兹和科尔曼的学术观点相比,制度法理论在阐明法律原则、强调法律概念的作用和社会学研究方法的引入上均做出了比较显著的贡献,但是其也存在体系性不足和模糊法律边界的缺陷。在整个分析实证主义法学范围内,制度法理论的突出贡献在于以解释性观点论证了分析法学的存在价值和学科界限,为分析法学注入了新的生机与活力。
[Abstract]:Institutional jurisprudence is a legal theory founded by British jurist Neil McCormick and Austria jurist Ota Weinberger. This article focuses on the introduction of Mccormick's theory of institutional law. The theory of institutional law incorporates some of the moral principles into the category of law through the theory of institutional ethics and combines the theory of institutional facts. In this paper, the background and theoretical framework of the construction of the theory of institutional law are combed and the academic value of the theory of institutional law is evaluated on the basis of the analysis of the separation proposition and social fact proposition of positivism. Discuss:
Introduction: introduce the theme of the article through the writing motivation of the article, and then briefly introduce the basic situation of institutional law and the current research status of the domestic academia, and then put forward the writing objectives and methods of writing.
Chapter one: to comb and analyze the background and cause of the theory of institutional law. The emergence of the theory of Mccormick's institutional law is not accidental. It is inseparable from the focus of academic debate and the background of academic times. From the direct reason, the origin of the theory of institutional law originated from the dispute between standardization and anti normalism. The theory of "law is a kind of institutional fact", which combines the normative orientation of the law and the social reality, and makes the normative theory achieve the development of social reality. But from a deeper reason, the emergence of the theory of institutional law is still due to the fierce attack of the two basic propositions of the analysis of positivism by Dworkin. A theory is needed to improve separation proposition and social fact proposition, so as to consolidate the basic position of analysis.
The second chapter: a reconstructive introduction to Mccormick's theory of institutional law is made from the perspective of the basic proposition of positivism. The theory of institutional morality and the theory of institutional fact are the two core of the theory of Mccormick's system law. The second chapter introduces the system morality theory associated with the separation proposition. The article first expounds Mccormick's virtue to Germany. The question of the framework of the woking theory suggests that a "system" which is not dependent on moral values can be defined as the formation of institutional morality. This system is actually a unity of legal rules and legal principles. Secondly, through practical reason, it is explained how the rules of recognition bring the system morality into the category of law and become the legal original. Thirdly, it proves that the theory of institutional morality still sticks to the conclusion that logic is separated from logic and adheres to separation proposition.
The third chapter introduces the system fact theory which is closely related to the social fact proposition. The system fact theory holds that law is not only a system system in philosophical sense, but also a kind of institutional reality in sociology. The characteristics of the two aspects of law are closely combined and inseparable. The system fact theory not only emphasizes that law is a social matter. It further clarifies that law is a systematic fact. It also safeguards and expands the social fact proposition.
The fourth chapter: on the premise of confirming the positivist position of the theoretical analysis of the institutional law, the theoretical value of it in the scope of the new analytical jurisprudence is expounded through the lateral comparison, and the theoretical value of it in the scope of the analysis of the positivist jurisprudence is expounded by the longitudinal comparison. In the scope of the new analytical law, the institutional law is compared with the academic views of Latz and Coleman. Theory has made a significant contribution to clarifying legal principles, emphasizing the role of legal concepts and the introduction of sociological research methods, but there are also shortcomings in the system and the boundary of fuzzy law. In the scope of the whole analysis of positivist jurisprudence, the outstanding contribution of the theory of institutional law lies in an explanatory point of view. The existence value and disciplinary boundaries of analytical jurisprudence have injected new vitality and vitality into analytical jurisprudence.
【学位授予单位】：华东政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D909.1
本文编号：2171688
[Abstract]:Institutional jurisprudence is a legal theory founded by British jurist Neil McCormick and Austria jurist Ota Weinberger. This article focuses on the introduction of Mccormick's theory of institutional law. The theory of institutional law incorporates some of the moral principles into the category of law through the theory of institutional ethics and combines the theory of institutional facts. In this paper, the background and theoretical framework of the construction of the theory of institutional law are combed and the academic value of the theory of institutional law is evaluated on the basis of the analysis of the separation proposition and social fact proposition of positivism. Discuss:
Introduction: introduce the theme of the article through the writing motivation of the article, and then briefly introduce the basic situation of institutional law and the current research status of the domestic academia, and then put forward the writing objectives and methods of writing.
Chapter one: to comb and analyze the background and cause of the theory of institutional law. The emergence of the theory of Mccormick's institutional law is not accidental. It is inseparable from the focus of academic debate and the background of academic times. From the direct reason, the origin of the theory of institutional law originated from the dispute between standardization and anti normalism. The theory of "law is a kind of institutional fact", which combines the normative orientation of the law and the social reality, and makes the normative theory achieve the development of social reality. But from a deeper reason, the emergence of the theory of institutional law is still due to the fierce attack of the two basic propositions of the analysis of positivism by Dworkin. A theory is needed to improve separation proposition and social fact proposition, so as to consolidate the basic position of analysis.
The second chapter: a reconstructive introduction to Mccormick's theory of institutional law is made from the perspective of the basic proposition of positivism. The theory of institutional morality and the theory of institutional fact are the two core of the theory of Mccormick's system law. The second chapter introduces the system morality theory associated with the separation proposition. The article first expounds Mccormick's virtue to Germany. The question of the framework of the woking theory suggests that a "system" which is not dependent on moral values can be defined as the formation of institutional morality. This system is actually a unity of legal rules and legal principles. Secondly, through practical reason, it is explained how the rules of recognition bring the system morality into the category of law and become the legal original. Thirdly, it proves that the theory of institutional morality still sticks to the conclusion that logic is separated from logic and adheres to separation proposition.
The third chapter introduces the system fact theory which is closely related to the social fact proposition. The system fact theory holds that law is not only a system system in philosophical sense, but also a kind of institutional reality in sociology. The characteristics of the two aspects of law are closely combined and inseparable. The system fact theory not only emphasizes that law is a social matter. It further clarifies that law is a systematic fact. It also safeguards and expands the social fact proposition.
The fourth chapter: on the premise of confirming the positivist position of the theoretical analysis of the institutional law, the theoretical value of it in the scope of the new analytical jurisprudence is expounded through the lateral comparison, and the theoretical value of it in the scope of the analysis of the positivist jurisprudence is expounded by the longitudinal comparison. In the scope of the new analytical law, the institutional law is compared with the academic views of Latz and Coleman. Theory has made a significant contribution to clarifying legal principles, emphasizing the role of legal concepts and the introduction of sociological research methods, but there are also shortcomings in the system and the boundary of fuzzy law. In the scope of the whole analysis of positivist jurisprudence, the outstanding contribution of the theory of institutional law lies in an explanatory point of view. The existence value and disciplinary boundaries of analytical jurisprudence have injected new vitality and vitality into analytical jurisprudence.
【学位授予单位】：华东政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D909.1
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 张文显;超越法律实证主义和自然法理论——制度法理学的认识-方法论和本体论[J];比较法研究;1995年01期
2 唐仲清;法律制度的概念分析——读弗里德曼《法律制度》、麦考密克、魏因贝格尔《制度法论》衍生的法哲学思辨[J];辽东学院学报;2005年01期
3 唐仲清;;对“制度事实”的法哲学思考[J];辽东学院学报;2006年02期
4 范立波;;分离命题与法律实证主义[J];法律科学(西北政法大学学报);2009年02期
5 陈锐;论法律实证主义[J];河南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2005年01期
6 陈金钊;;法律事实的定位与制度性事实——评《制度法论》[J];南京大学法律评论;1999年01期
7 褚国建;;疑难案件与法律推理——麦考密克之《法律推理与法律理论》评析[J];清华法治论衡;2009年02期
8 朱峰;;法律实证主义的命题研究[J];法学论坛;2006年06期
9 中山龙一,周永胜;二十世纪法理学的范式转换[J];外国法译评;2000年03期
10 支振锋;;从社会事实到法律规范——作为社会实践的法律[J];环球法律评论;2009年03期
相关硕士学位论文 前2条
1 席琳;法律和道德的制度性结合[D];西南政法大学;2006年
2 王乔;新分析法学“社会事实命题”研究[D];湖南大学;2008年
，本文编号：2171688
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/falilunwen/2171688.html
