诉讼不举证的行政违法赔偿责任判断——对孙某诉镇政府行政赔偿案的评析

发布时间：2018-09-03 15:41

【摘要】：违法行政行为造成当事人损害后果的,行政机关应当承担行政赔偿责任,这是行政赔偿诉讼的基本要义。法院以行政机关逾期未举证为由判决撤销行政行为,由此引发的行政赔偿诉讼中,判断行政机关是否应当对损害后果承担赔偿责任,与一般行政违法情形下的行政赔偿诉讼不同,需要具体分析辨别。人民法院以被告行政机关未在法定期限内提供证据、依据为由判决撤销行政行为,当事人依据该判决提起行政赔偿诉讼的,人民法院应审查认定行政行为是否实际存在违法情形,据此进行因果关系判断,得出当事人的赔偿主张是否成立的判决结论;人民法院对行政行为是否违法的审查强度,以"谁主张谁举证"原则,根据优势证据进行审查认定为宜。
[Abstract]:If an illegal administrative act causes damage to the parties, the administrative organ shall bear the responsibility of administrative compensation, which is the basic meaning of the administrative compensation lawsuit. The court decides to rescind the administrative act on the grounds that the administrative organ has failed to prove the case within the time limit, and in the administrative compensation proceedings arising therefrom, the court shall judge whether the administrative organ should bear the liability for compensation for the consequences of the damage, Different from the administrative compensation litigation under the general situation of administrative violation, it needs specific analysis and discrimination. Where a people's court decides to revoke an administrative act on the grounds that the defendant's administrative organ has not provided evidence within the statutory time limit, and the party concerned initiates an administrative compensation action on the basis of the said judgment, The people's court shall examine and determine whether the administrative act actually violates the law, make a causal judgment accordingly, and draw the conclusion whether the party's claim for compensation is established; the intensity of the people's court's examination of whether the administrative act is illegal or not, According to the principle of "who claims who proves the evidence", it is appropriate to examine and confirm it according to the evidence of superiority.
【作者单位】：天津市高级人民法院行政庭;
【分类号】：D920.5;D925.3

【相似文献】