安乐死立法的宪法学思考
[Abstract]:Euthanasia, as an essentially different term from death with dignity and assisted suicide by doctors, has sparked unprecedented controversy in the legal community, and has been accompanied by frequent cases of euthanasia. Euthanasia legislation has also become an urgent issue in front of all countries. Although our country is not in the forefront of euthanasia legislation as a few countries, theoretically, euthanasia legislation does not exceed the moral interpretation space of our constitution, but conforms to the requirement of socialist public morality advocated by the text of our constitution. Euthanasia legislation does not shake the state's objective obligation to protect the right to life, nor does it lead to the conflict between the right to life and human dignity, which provides constitutional support for the legislation of euthanasia in China. In practice, the progress and development of medical science, the gradual change of the concept of death in the world, and the euthanasia decriminalization practice are in full swing, which indicates the feasibility of euthanasia legislation in our country. However, in the specific design of euthanasia legislation, it is not allowed to cross the constitutional boundaries from application acceptance to approval. Euthanasia legislation must not only abide by the true meaning of constitutional right to life, but also abide by the principle of due process of law and the principle of proportionality. We should abide by the principle of legal reservation and maintain the internal harmony of the legal system.
【学位授予单位】:苏州大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2012
【分类号】:D920.4
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 梁根林;争取人道死亡的权利——世界范围内的安乐死运动[J];比较法研究;2004年03期
2 王锴;;安乐死的宪法学思考[J];法律与医学杂志;2006年02期
3 雷安军;;安乐死非罪化问题研究[J];法学杂志;2009年06期
4 刘三木,汪再祥;关于安乐死的若干争议问题之讨论[J];法学评论;2004年06期
5 徐小冰;人权冲突及人权的协调实现[J];法学;2005年11期
6 何农;庞宁;;浅析安乐死——以浙江地区730例调查为基础[J];法制与社会;2009年19期
7 何农;解少君;;浙江地区法律工作者安乐死认同度调查及其法学分析[J];长春理工大学学报(高教版);2010年02期
8 欧阳涛;安乐死的现状与立法[J];法制与社会发展;1996年05期
9 何农;陆海峰;;浙江地区农村居民安乐死认同度调查与分析[J];社科纵横;2009年09期
10 尹田;;论人格权概括保护的立法模式——“一般人格权”概念的废除[J];河南省政法管理干部学院学报;2011年01期
相关硕士学位论文 前9条
1 李中原;安乐死合法化研究[D];西南政法大学;2002年
2 杨克敏;安乐死问题研究[D];中国政法大学;2004年
3 曾浩;安乐死问题研究[D];西南政法大学;2006年
4 韩玉霞;由生命权论安乐死之合法化[D];山东大学;2006年
5 李小丹;安乐死的非罪化探讨[D];华东政法大学;2007年
6 荣良忠;我国安乐死立法若干问题研究[D];南京医科大学;2007年
7 叶清e
本文编号:2286427
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/falilunwen/2286427.html