论司法中的法律不确定性的法理分析
发布时间：2018-10-29 20:58
【摘要】：法律的确定性是法治的基础。但是对于法律确定性这个问题，一直存在争论。有的认为法律是绝对的确定的，因而适法者只是机械地把具体案件与法律规范对应起来，也有的认为法律的确定性不是绝对的，例如，法律原则的适用需要加入适法者的价值判断。本文对法律确定性问题的不同观点进行考察，认为法律是相对不确定的，并且这种不确定在司法过程中体现出来，导致司法的相对不确定。 全文分为三章，主要内容如下： 第一章阐述从法律的确定性到法律的不确定性。法律确定性是法治的目标和要求，通过西方关于法律确定性问题的相关理论，认识法律不确定性的客观存在，并分析这种不确定性对现实产生的影响。 第二章研究司法过程中的法律不确定性。主要是从两个方面进行分析，一方面对司法过程中的法律不确定的表现加以分析，包括法律概念的不确定、法律事实认定的不确定、法律规则的不确定和裁判的不确定另一个方面分析造成司法过程中这些不确定性表现的原因，笔者认为主要原因在于法律语言的开放性、立法的局限、社会生活的复杂和法官本身所受到的影响。 第三章思考应对司法过程中的法律不确定性的措施。当前学界对这个问题的观点较多，文中主要对法官自由裁量、司法解释和引入判例的观点进行了评述。并在前人研究的基础上，针对造成法律不确定的因素，思考促进法律确定性的途径，，认为当前我们可以通过完善立法、加强法律适用的程序设置、提高法官素质、法律解释、漏洞补充和价值衡量等措施，应对司法过程中的法律不确定。
[Abstract]:Legal certainty is the foundation of the rule of law. However, there has always been an argument about legal certainty. Some think that the law is absolutely certain, so that the fittest merely mechanically corresponds the specific case to the legal norm, and others think that the certainty of the law is not absolute, for example, The application of the principle of law needs to add the value judgment of the applicable person. This paper investigates the different viewpoints of the legal certainty, and thinks that the law is relatively uncertain, and this uncertainty is reflected in the judicial process, which leads to the relative uncertainty of the judicature. The paper is divided into three chapters. The main contents are as follows: the first chapter expounds from legal certainty to legal uncertainty. Legal certainty is the goal and requirement of the rule of law. Through the relevant theories about legal certainty in the west, the objective existence of legal uncertainty is recognized and the influence of this uncertainty on reality is analyzed. The second chapter studies the legal uncertainty in the judicial process. On the one hand, it analyzes the expression of the legal uncertainty in the judicial process, including the uncertainty of the legal concept, the uncertainty of the determination of the legal facts, The uncertainty of the legal rules and the uncertainty of the referee another aspect of the analysis of the causes of these uncertainties in the judicial process, the author believes that the main reasons are the openness of the legal language, the limitations of legislation, The complexity of social life and the impact on the judge himself. The third chapter considers the measures to deal with the legal uncertainty in the judicial process. There are many views on this issue in the academic circles. This paper mainly comments on the judges' discretion, judicial interpretation and the introduction of jurisprudence. On the basis of previous studies, the author thinks about the ways to promote legal certainty in view of the factors that cause the uncertainty of law, and thinks that at present we can improve legislation, strengthen the procedure of law application, improve the quality of judges, and explain the law. Measures such as loophole supplement and value measurement should be taken to deal with the legal uncertainty in the judicial process.
【学位授予单位】：广州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D90
本文编号：2298807
[Abstract]:Legal certainty is the foundation of the rule of law. However, there has always been an argument about legal certainty. Some think that the law is absolutely certain, so that the fittest merely mechanically corresponds the specific case to the legal norm, and others think that the certainty of the law is not absolute, for example, The application of the principle of law needs to add the value judgment of the applicable person. This paper investigates the different viewpoints of the legal certainty, and thinks that the law is relatively uncertain, and this uncertainty is reflected in the judicial process, which leads to the relative uncertainty of the judicature. The paper is divided into three chapters. The main contents are as follows: the first chapter expounds from legal certainty to legal uncertainty. Legal certainty is the goal and requirement of the rule of law. Through the relevant theories about legal certainty in the west, the objective existence of legal uncertainty is recognized and the influence of this uncertainty on reality is analyzed. The second chapter studies the legal uncertainty in the judicial process. On the one hand, it analyzes the expression of the legal uncertainty in the judicial process, including the uncertainty of the legal concept, the uncertainty of the determination of the legal facts, The uncertainty of the legal rules and the uncertainty of the referee another aspect of the analysis of the causes of these uncertainties in the judicial process, the author believes that the main reasons are the openness of the legal language, the limitations of legislation, The complexity of social life and the impact on the judge himself. The third chapter considers the measures to deal with the legal uncertainty in the judicial process. There are many views on this issue in the academic circles. This paper mainly comments on the judges' discretion, judicial interpretation and the introduction of jurisprudence. On the basis of previous studies, the author thinks about the ways to promote legal certainty in view of the factors that cause the uncertainty of law, and thinks that at present we can improve legislation, strengthen the procedure of law application, improve the quality of judges, and explain the law. Measures such as loophole supplement and value measurement should be taken to deal with the legal uncertainty in the judicial process.
【学位授予单位】：广州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D90
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 黄金荣;法的形式理性论——以法之确定性问题为中心[J];比较法研究;2000年03期
2 卡尔·拉伦茨 ,赵阳;论作为科学的法学的不可或缺性——1966年4月20日在柏林法学会的演讲[J];比较法研究;2005年03期
3 张伟强;;审判的法律效果与社会效果——法官应该追求什么[J];法律方法;2009年00期
4 王晨光;法律运行中的不确定性与“错案追究制”的误区[J];法学;1997年03期
5 郑永流;法律判断形成的模式[J];法学研究;2004年01期
6 吕芳;穿行于理想和现实之间的平衡——从法律文化的视角解读“法律效果和社会效果的统一”[J];法学论坛;2005年03期
7 王伟国;;从不确定中追求确定——论法官自由裁量权及其治理[J];山东审判(山东法官培训学院学报);2006年02期
8 舒国滢;法律原则适用的困境——方法论视角的四个追问[J];苏州大学学报;2005年01期
9 王建;;法律语言的模糊性及准确运用[J];西南政法大学学报;2006年02期
10 郇兴艳;;法的确定性与法治的实现[J];延边大学学报(社会科学版);2009年06期
相关硕士学位论文 前2条
1 朱勇;法官自由裁量权的范围和限度[D];南京师范大学;2003年
2 罗瑜;和谐语境下法律效果和社会效果统一的探究[D];湖南大学;2008年
本文编号：2298807
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/falilunwen/2298807.html
