冲突法历史发展中的特殊主义与普遍主义
发布时间：2018-10-30 10:12
【摘要】："特殊主义"与"普遍主义"的矛盾一直伴随着冲突法的历史发展。历史上最早形成的冲突法理论即巴托鲁斯的"法则区别说"是以民族国家为本位的比较温和的特殊主义理论范式,在其后的发展中走向了比较极端的特殊主义。18世纪末,萨维尼的"法律关系本座说"是随着资本主义世界市场的开拓而产生的以国际社会为本位的普遍主义理论范式。20世纪美国冲突法学界出现了特殊主义冲突法理论的复兴。片面的特殊主义和普遍主义各有其局限性,"最密切联系原则"的提出,表现出特殊主义和普遍主义融合统一的倾向,代表了当代冲突法理论发展的基本趋势。
[Abstract]:The contradiction between "particularity" and "universalism" has been accompanied by the historical development of conflict law. The earliest theory of conflict of laws formed in history, namely Bartolus's "Law differentiation Theory", is a more moderate and special theoretical paradigm based on nation-state, and in the course of its subsequent development, it has moved towards the more extreme specialism, which was at the end of the 18th century. Savini's "legal relation theory" is an international society-oriented universalism theoretical paradigm with the development of capitalist world market. In the 20th century, the conflict law theory of special doctrine was revived in American conflict law circles. One-sided particularism and universalism have their own limitations. The proposition of "the principle of the closest connection" shows the tendency of the integration of particularity and universalism, which represents the basic trend of the development of contemporary conflict law theory.
【作者单位】： 南开大学法学院;
【分类号】：D90
本文编号：2299708
[Abstract]:The contradiction between "particularity" and "universalism" has been accompanied by the historical development of conflict law. The earliest theory of conflict of laws formed in history, namely Bartolus's "Law differentiation Theory", is a more moderate and special theoretical paradigm based on nation-state, and in the course of its subsequent development, it has moved towards the more extreme specialism, which was at the end of the 18th century. Savini's "legal relation theory" is an international society-oriented universalism theoretical paradigm with the development of capitalist world market. In the 20th century, the conflict law theory of special doctrine was revived in American conflict law circles. One-sided particularism and universalism have their own limitations. The proposition of "the principle of the closest connection" shows the tendency of the integration of particularity and universalism, which represents the basic trend of the development of contemporary conflict law theory.
【作者单位】： 南开大学法学院;
【分类号】：D90
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前7条
1 时殷弘;;现实主义政治伦理与特殊主义世界观——西方经典思想和当代中国理念[J];世界经济与政治论坛;2011年01期
2 尹才祥;;大卫·哈维空间政治思想的四重维度[J];山西师大学报(社会科学版);2014年01期
3 任剑涛;;特殊主义、普遍主义与现代性政治的认同——在中西政治文化之间的言说[J];江海学刊;2007年01期
4 霍桂桓;论文化发展的辩证运动——超越文化普遍主义和文化特殊主义[J];江苏行政学院学报;2003年01期
5 周兴维;;从特殊到普遍:中国特色社会主义[J];西南民族大学学报(人文社科版);2009年04期
6 徐伟;;比较法的走向[J];湖北警官学院学报;2013年05期
7 ;[J];;年期
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 耿子亮;丹西的道德特殊主义[D];南京师范大学;2013年
，本文编号：2299708
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/falilunwen/2299708.html
