论儒家的“无讼”思想
发布时间：2018-11-07 19:44
【摘要】：据中等收入陷阱的理论，人均GDP在3000—10000美元之间是矛盾突显期，这是经济快速发展积累的矛盾集中爆发的时期，容易出现经济回落或停滞、社会动荡、信仰缺失等问题。大部分国家无法找到新的经济发展模式克服这些困难，无法进入高收入国家行列。当前我国社会，经过三十多年的改革开放，按照国际货币基金组织（IMF）公布的数据，2010年中国的人均GDP达到4382美元，排在全球第94名。依照以上理论，我们正处于矛盾突显期，处理好国家发展中出现的这些矛盾非常重要，而解决这些矛盾需要一个稳定的社会环境，因此，社会的和谐稳定就显得尤为重要，维护社会稳定要从我国传统思想宝库中充分发掘有用资源。我国传统上将“和谐”作为社会的最终目标，将“无讼”作为实现和谐的重要的手段，这种法律意识仍然存在人们的思想中，这对建立和谐社会有着重要的价值。我们在建立和谐社会的过程中，既要利用传统“无讼”思想中的有益思想，又要摒弃对秩序的过分追求，，我们建立的和谐社会应当是一个法治社会，公平正义是和谐社会追求的最高价值，通过公平正义让社会安定有序，从而实现“无讼”。
[Abstract]:According to the theory of middle income trap, GDP per capita is a period of contradiction between 3000-10, 000 US dollars, which is a period of concentration of contradictions accumulated by rapid economic development, which is prone to economic decline or stagnation, social unrest, lack of faith and other problems. Most countries are unable to find new models of economic development to overcome these difficulties and to join the ranks of high-income countries. At present, after more than 30 years of reform and opening up, according to the data released by the International Monetary Fund (IMF), China's per capita GDP reached 4382 US dollars in 2010, ranking 94th in the world. According to the above theory, we are in the period of contradiction highlighting. It is very important to deal with these contradictions in the course of national development. To solve these contradictions, we need a stable social environment. Therefore, social harmony and stability are particularly important. To maintain social stability, we should fully explore useful resources from our traditional ideological treasure house. Our country has traditionally regarded "harmony" as the ultimate goal of the society and "no lawsuit" as an important means to achieve harmony. This legal consciousness still exists in people's thoughts, which is of great value to the establishment of a harmonious society. In the process of building a harmonious society, we should not only make use of the beneficial ideas in the traditional "no lawsuit" thought, but also abandon the excessive pursuit of order. The harmonious society we have built should be a society ruled by law. Fairness and justice is the highest value of harmonious society.
【学位授予单位】：新疆大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D909.2;B222
本文编号：2317386
[Abstract]:According to the theory of middle income trap, GDP per capita is a period of contradiction between 3000-10, 000 US dollars, which is a period of concentration of contradictions accumulated by rapid economic development, which is prone to economic decline or stagnation, social unrest, lack of faith and other problems. Most countries are unable to find new models of economic development to overcome these difficulties and to join the ranks of high-income countries. At present, after more than 30 years of reform and opening up, according to the data released by the International Monetary Fund (IMF), China's per capita GDP reached 4382 US dollars in 2010, ranking 94th in the world. According to the above theory, we are in the period of contradiction highlighting. It is very important to deal with these contradictions in the course of national development. To solve these contradictions, we need a stable social environment. Therefore, social harmony and stability are particularly important. To maintain social stability, we should fully explore useful resources from our traditional ideological treasure house. Our country has traditionally regarded "harmony" as the ultimate goal of the society and "no lawsuit" as an important means to achieve harmony. This legal consciousness still exists in people's thoughts, which is of great value to the establishment of a harmonious society. In the process of building a harmonious society, we should not only make use of the beneficial ideas in the traditional "no lawsuit" thought, but also abandon the excessive pursuit of order. The harmonious society we have built should be a society ruled by law. Fairness and justice is the highest value of harmonious society.
【学位授予单位】：新疆大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D909.2;B222
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 徐和平;胡志斌;;解析中国古代无讼理念的成因[J];安徽广播电视大学学报;2006年04期
2 秦正发;刘永红;;论无讼法律传统产生的历史根源[J];长春工程学院学报(社会科学版);2009年03期
3 濮方平;王芳;;试论儒家“无讼”传统观的当代裂变与释放[J];重庆工学院学报(社会科学版);2007年01期
4 陈雪云;我国古代“无讼”论再认识[J];福建公安高等专科学校学报;2003年03期
5 吴勇;传统无讼思想的当代价值[J];广西商业高等专科学校学报;2005年01期
6 程宗璋;中国传统社会“无讼观”的再认识[J];湖北民族学院学报(社会科学版);1998年05期
7 杨宝丽;;刍论中国古代无讼贱讼思想及其当代启示[J];理论导刊;2006年04期
8 吴佳;;无讼观念的历史渊源与现代影响[J];理论观察;2008年02期
9 郑玉敏;无讼价值观的产生原因及消极影响[J];理论界;2004年01期
10 高玉娟;;传统无讼价值观的合理性探析[J];齐齐哈尔大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2006年06期
相关硕士学位论文 前2条
1 顾一鸣;论中国传统“无讼”法律思想及其对当代中国法制建设的启示[D];江苏大学;2007年
2 辛以春;孔子“无讼”解[D];苏州大学;2007年
本文编号：2317386
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/falilunwen/2317386.html
