权利冲突解决方式之反思
发布时间：2018-11-11 07:17
【摘要】：私力救济和公力救济都是权利冲突的解决方式。非诉方式是权利冲突解决方式之一。权利冲突的公力解决方法则通常会从立法方式和司法审判方式入手解决。针对公力救济和私力救济的优势,我国实践中探索出司法调解这种纠纷解决方式。但是,只有能真正实现对人权和个人自由保障的解决方式才是最佳方式。这既响应世界范围内各国对人权的尊重,体现宪法对人权保障的要求;也体现现代法律的精神内核。
[Abstract]:Private relief and public relief are both solutions to conflicts of rights. Non-litigation is one of the ways to resolve conflicts of rights. The public solution to the conflict of rights usually begins with legislation and judicial trial. In view of the advantages of public relief and private relief, judicial mediation is explored in our country. But only a solution that truly guarantees human rights and individual freedoms is the best. This not only responds to the respect of human rights in various countries all over the world, but also reflects the requirements of the constitution for the protection of human rights, as well as the spiritual core of modern law.
【作者单位】： 烟台大学法学院;
【基金】：本人主持的山东省社会科学规划研究项目《权利冲突解决中的法律解释方法适用》(13DFXJ08) 山东省高等学校人文社会科学研究项目《宪法自由权的司法保障机制研究》(J13WB10)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D90
[Abstract]:Private relief and public relief are both solutions to conflicts of rights. Non-litigation is one of the ways to resolve conflicts of rights. The public solution to the conflict of rights usually begins with legislation and judicial trial. In view of the advantages of public relief and private relief, judicial mediation is explored in our country. But only a solution that truly guarantees human rights and individual freedoms is the best. This not only responds to the respect of human rights in various countries all over the world, but also reflects the requirements of the constitution for the protection of human rights, as well as the spiritual core of modern law.
【作者单位】： 烟台大学法学院;
【基金】：本人主持的山东省社会科学规划研究项目《权利冲突解决中的法律解释方法适用》(13DFXJ08) 山东省高等学校人文社会科学研究项目《宪法自由权的司法保障机制研究》(J13WB10)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D90
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前2条
1 刘旺洪;;公民基本权利宪法保障程序论略[J];江苏社会科学;2006年05期
2 左卫民;;变革时代的纠纷解决及其研究进路[J];四川大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2007年02期
【共引文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 王端庆,毛国红,曹大文;加强法制建设是推进21世纪我国高教发展的重要基础[J];华东冶金学院学报(社会科学版);1999年01期
2 吕柳玲;;两大法系之代理理论及其比较[J];安康学院学报;2008年03期
3 张静;;从思想到生活:中国法学的目的迷失及找回——《中国法学向何处去》所开启的思考[J];白城师范学院学报;2006年01期
4 强世功;;权力的组织网络与法律的治理化——马锡五审判方式与中国法律的新传统[J];北大法律评论;2000年02期
5 朱晓U，
本文编号：2324149
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/falilunwen/2324149.html
