汉代诉讼证据制度研究
[Abstract]:This paper is based on the historical documents of the Han Dynasty, which reflect the original appearance of the legal provisions and judicial practice of the Han Dynasty, such as "the Law of two years", "the Book of conviction", "the Han slips of Juyan" and some other unearthed historical materials. This paper makes a macroscopic and systematic study on the system of litigation evidence in Han Dynasty. The article thinks: the lawsuit evidence of Han Dynasty mainly has five forms: material evidence, documentary evidence, witness testimony, party statement, investigation and appraisal record; In "prison", similar to today's criminal cases, the client's confession, especially the defendant's confession, is the main evidence. In litigation, similar to today's civil cases, documentary evidence is the key to accepting and adjudicating cases. In addition, due to the development of investigation and identification technology, the record of investigation and identification has become an important evidence of the final case. In the final judgment process there are many kinds of evidence used together to verify each other. During the Han Dynasty the evidence was mainly obtained by interrogation torture investigation and identification investigation and prosecution investigation and secret investigation and so on. The principle of obtaining evidence under interrogation and torture is formed. In criminal cases, the way of torture is used to obtain confessions, but in civil cases, the way of torture is seldom used to obtain evidence; Under the request of the general evidence principle of "attach importance to evidence, according to evidence", the principle of evidence in the Han Dynasty has the following aspects: the principle of crime, the principle of punishment, the principle of risk of proof, the principle of punishment of perjury and the principle of risk of punishment. In criminal cases follow the principle of confession first, in civil cases pay attention to documentary evidence, the principle of witness. Fully reflect the Confucian thought of "close to each other" the principle of witness avoidance and other characteristics.
【学位授予单位】:鲁东大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2012
【分类号】:D929;D925
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 蒋铁初;;中国古代民事证据法的特点[J];安庆师范学院学报(社会科学版);2007年04期
2 蒋铁初;;明清民事习惯的证据功能[J];北方论丛;2007年04期
3 尤欣欣;;中国古代证据制度研究综述[J];法律文献信息与研究;2008年01期
4 蒋铁初;;清代刑事人证的制度与实践[J];甘肃政法学院学报;2011年02期
5 马念珍;试析中国古代诉讼中的证据制度[J];贵州教育学院学报(社会科学版);2000年05期
6 蒋铁初;;清代民事诉讼中的伪证及防治[J];华东政法大学学报;2010年03期
7 王旭,杨荣东;中国古代证据制度的特点[J];辽宁警专学报;2000年04期
8 沈大明;;中国古代的证据制度及其特点[J];社会科学;2006年07期
9 陈长琦,赵恒慧;两汉县级管辖下的司法制度[J];史学月刊;2002年06期
10 ;江陵张家山汉简《奏谳书》释文(一)[J];文物;1993年08期
相关博士学位论文 前4条
1 蒋铁初;中国近代证据制度研究[D];中国政法大学;2003年
2 程政举;汉代诉讼制度研究[D];郑州大学;2006年
3 杨波;法律事实建构论[D];吉林大学;2007年
4 祖伟;中国古代证据制度及其理据研究[D];吉林大学;2009年
相关硕士学位论文 前5条
1 李华;宋代证据制度研究[D];河北大学;2003年
2 郭明月;春秋战国时期诉讼证据研究[D];陕西师范大学;2005年
3 孙向欣;论古代刑事诉讼证据[D];吉林大学;2008年
4 王亚琼;试论唐代的证据制度[D];中国政法大学;2008年
5 牛志强;唐代口供证据研究[D];郑州大学;2009年
,本文编号:2381410
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/falilunwen/2381410.html