当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 法理论文 >

论法律家长主义在我国的运用与限制

发布时间:2019-04-03 16:48
【摘要】:法律家长主义,从字面上就可以看出,它是将法律和公民之间比作家长和子女的关系:法律应当在保护与增加公民利益的目的基础上对公民进行约束教育,而公民应当出于对自身利益的考虑也应当服从这样一种善意的干预并因此而受益。起源于或者类似伦理理念的法律家长主义在现代社会并不真正涉及伦理方面,它的核心问题在于自由——只有为了自由的缘故才能限制自由。在有限的可以理所应当限制自由的原则中,,包含法律家长主义,能够被证成是有限制条件的,不是任何情况下都可以。在不同的文化背景、意识形态下,我们要在概念上对法律家长主义进行澄清,进而全面理解它的强制性与引导性。通过家长主义式的法律提升公民利益和福祉的同时,寻求自由和法律家长主义之间的合理界限具有更重要的意义。 本文建立在西方学者对法律家长主义的研究成果之上,旨在明晰界定家长主义式的法律,阐述其存在的合理性,进而对研究法律家长主义在我国的具体运用与限制做好理论铺垫。文章对法律家长主义的概念、构成条件及历史流变进行了详细阐述;分别从人是一种“有朽”的理性动物、法律经济学的效益角度及社会权发展的现实需要三个角度分析论证了法律家长主义存在的合理性;在此基础上,研究法律家长主义在我国的具体运用,结合我国的立法实践,分析在我国运用的特点,着重介绍限制财产权方面的家长主义式法律;最后对法律家长主义的限制进行相关探讨,使其达到存在的目的——限制公民自由的同时提升公民的利益。 对于法律家长主义的研究,有利于我国民主法治建设的开展。本文就是要在现阶段我国法治框架下,对法律家长主义进行简单梳理,使其在我国的运用掌握在合理合法的限度之内,为我所用。
[Abstract]:Legal parentheism, as can be seen from the word, is the relationship between the law and the citizen as a parent and a child: the law should educate the citizen on the basis of the protection and the increase of the interests of the citizens, Citizens should also be subject to such a kind of good faith and benefit from the consideration of their own interests. The legal parentheism, which originated from or similar to the ethical concept, does not really involve ethics in the modern society, and its core problem is that freedom can only be restricted for freedom. The principle of limited freedom to limit freedom, including legal parentheism, can be proved to be conditional, not in any case. Under the different cultural background and ideology, we should clarify the legal parentheism in the concept, and then fully understand its mandatory and guiding principles. It is of great significance to seek the reasonable boundaries between freedom and the law of the parents while promoting the interests and well-being of the citizens through the family-oriented law. This paper is based on the research results of the western scholars on the legal parentheism, and aims to clearly define the law of the patriarchism, and to explain the rationality of the law, and to lay a theoretical foundation for the study of the specific application and the limitation of the legal parentheism in our country. The article gives a detailed description of the concept, composition and history of the legal parentheism. From the perspective of the rational animal of the "to have a hand", the benefit of the legal economics and the reality of the development of the social right, it is necessary to analyze the rationality of the existence of the legal parentheism. On the basis of this, the study of the specific application of the legal parentheism in our country, in combination with our country's legislative practice, analyses the characteristics of the application in our country, and emphatically introduces the parental-type law on the limitation of property right; and finally, the limitation of the legal parentheism is discussed. To achieve the purpose of being present _ to limit civil liberties and to promote the benefit of a citizen. The study of the legal parentheism is beneficial to the construction of the democratic rule of law in our country. This paper, under the framework of the rule of law in our country, makes a simple analysis of the legal parentheism, so that its application in our country is within a reasonable and legal limit.
【学位授予单位】:辽宁大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2012
【分类号】:D909.2

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 高家伟;论德国行政法的基本观念[J];比较法研究;1997年03期

2 赫然;亓晓鹏;;法律父爱主义的可能困境及保障策略[J];长白学刊;2010年05期

3 孙笑侠,郭春镇;美国的法律家长主义理论与实践[J];法律科学.西北政法学院学报;2005年06期

4 林来梵;针对国家享有的财产权——从比较法角度的一个考察[J];法商研究;2003年01期

5 徐国栋;;民法私法说还能维持多久——行为经济学对时下民法学的潜在影响[J];法学;2006年05期

6 黄文艺;;作为一种法律干预模式的家长主义[J];法学研究;2010年05期

7 童之伟;再论法理学的更新[J];法学研究;1999年02期

8 蔡陈聪;试析西方哲学史中的价值主观论和客观论——兼论价值范畴的一般本质[J];社会科学辑刊;1998年01期

9 秦前红;论我国宪法关于公民基本权利的限制规定[J];河南省政法管理干部学院学报;2005年02期

10 松井茂记,莫纪宏;论自己决定权[J];外国法译评;1996年03期



本文编号:2453370

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/falilunwen/2453370.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户1ef7b***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com