法律原则适用问题研究—规则约束说探析
发布时间：2019-04-12 16:52
【摘要】：法律原则的理论研究在西方国家早已有了林林总总的流派，而在我国大陆法理学教科书中一般仅将其与法律概念、法律规则等等一并作为法律的基本要素之一，，但是21世纪以来由于我国司法实践的吁求，法律原则理论得到了较大的发展。例如2001年发生在四川的那起闻名全国的泸州遗赠案，法院就已经面临着“法律原则如何适用”的难题。而由此引发的纠结在法律规则和社会价值之间的法律原则，承载了太多的分歧与争论。这不仅因为其是立法中心模式和司法中心模式竞争的对象，而且也是原则之治与规则之治争论的中心。而纵观我国法学界对于法律原则问题的研究基本上都是围绕法律原则的适用问题而展开，都力求对该问题进行作出更加合理的、更具有学理性的解释;但是其中涉及的甚多法律问题至今终无定论，至少没有形成一个相对统一、全面、完整的论说。故本文亦将以法律原则适用问题研究为中心，全面了解法律原则适用理论研究的现状，在充分把握法律原则与法律规则的关系、法律原则的适用条件、法律原则在民法与刑法中适用的差异的基础上，进行深入探析规则约束说的内涵和现实意义，并运用哲学理论通过法律逻辑分析的方法，从实质理性与形式理性在法学领域里的实践现状上和司法权来源的角度上进行充分论证规则约束说的理论基础。
[Abstract]:The theoretical study of legal principles has long existed in western countries, but in the textbooks of jurisprudence in mainland China, it is generally regarded as one of the basic elements of law together with legal concepts, legal rules and so on. However, since the 21st century, due to the appeal of our judicial practice, the theory of legal principles has been greatly developed. For example, in the famous Luzhou bequest case in Sichuan Province in 2001, the court already faced the problem of "how to apply the legal principles". Therefore, the legal principles between legal rules and social values bear too many differences and controversies. This is not only the object of competition between the legislative-centered model and the judicial-centered model, but also the center of the dispute between the rule-governing and the rule-based governance. On the whole, the research on the legal principle in the legal circle of our country is based on the application of the legal principle, and all strive to make a more reasonable and more rational explanation of the problem. However, many of the legal issues involved are still inconclusive, at least not forming a relatively unified, comprehensive and complete theory. Therefore, this paper will also take the study of the application of legal principles as the center, fully understand the current situation of the theoretical research on the application of legal principles, fully grasp the relationship between legal principles and legal rules, and the applicable conditions of legal principles. On the basis of the difference between civil law and criminal law, this paper makes an in-depth analysis of the connotation and practical significance of the rule restraint theory, and applies the philosophical theory through the method of legal logic analysis. This paper fully demonstrates the theoretical basis of the rule restraint theory from the point of view of the practice status of the substantive rationality and the formal reason in the field of law and the source of judicial power.
【学位授予单位】：江西师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D90
本文编号：2457199
[Abstract]:The theoretical study of legal principles has long existed in western countries, but in the textbooks of jurisprudence in mainland China, it is generally regarded as one of the basic elements of law together with legal concepts, legal rules and so on. However, since the 21st century, due to the appeal of our judicial practice, the theory of legal principles has been greatly developed. For example, in the famous Luzhou bequest case in Sichuan Province in 2001, the court already faced the problem of "how to apply the legal principles". Therefore, the legal principles between legal rules and social values bear too many differences and controversies. This is not only the object of competition between the legislative-centered model and the judicial-centered model, but also the center of the dispute between the rule-governing and the rule-based governance. On the whole, the research on the legal principle in the legal circle of our country is based on the application of the legal principle, and all strive to make a more reasonable and more rational explanation of the problem. However, many of the legal issues involved are still inconclusive, at least not forming a relatively unified, comprehensive and complete theory. Therefore, this paper will also take the study of the application of legal principles as the center, fully understand the current situation of the theoretical research on the application of legal principles, fully grasp the relationship between legal principles and legal rules, and the applicable conditions of legal principles. On the basis of the difference between civil law and criminal law, this paper makes an in-depth analysis of the connotation and practical significance of the rule restraint theory, and applies the philosophical theory through the method of legal logic analysis. This paper fully demonstrates the theoretical basis of the rule restraint theory from the point of view of the practice status of the substantive rationality and the formal reason in the field of law and the source of judicial power.
【学位授予单位】：江西师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D90
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 汪全胜;;法律适用原则竞合时的司法选择[J];北京理工大学学报(社会科学版);2009年05期
2 陈实;论法官在困难案件中的角色[J];法律科学.西北政法学院学报;2000年03期
3 吴春雷;司法裁判中的法律原则适用质疑[J];法学杂志;2005年02期
4 庞凌;法律原则的识别和适用[J];法学;2004年10期
5 梁迎修;;法律原则的适用——基于方法论视角的分析[J];华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版);2007年06期
6 李可;原则和规则的若干问题[J];法学研究;2001年05期
7 董雯婧;;方法论视野下法律原则的司法适用[J];民办教育研究;2009年08期
8 李传先;;法律原则的适用方式及方法[J];前沿;2009年01期
9 舒国滢;法律原则适用中的难题何在[J];苏州大学学报;2004年06期
10 谢晖;法律原则的效力和适用条件[J];苏州大学学报;2004年06期
本文编号：2457199
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/falilunwen/2457199.html
