风俗习惯的司法适用研究
发布时间：2019-04-26 04:32
【摘要】：在司法实践中,已经开始出现了在判决中综合考虑风俗习惯的情形,这种现象引发了学界和司法领域内对风俗习惯的适用这一问题的激烈讨论。应当说,风俗习惯的司法适用是现代法治容纳多元价值和文化的重要体现,而且在司法实践领域,风俗习惯解决纠纷的能力是不容忽视的,但却往往由于其非正式法源的地位而引发一系列争议。本文的写作目的在于为司法实践中风俗习惯的适用寻找一些学理上的支持。本文的第一章,对风俗习惯的概念、特点进行了辨析。风俗习惯作为一种本土资源,更多的体现的是一种知识传统的属性,作为民间的行为规范,我们可以尝试从地域性和规范性两个层面尝试着对风俗习惯进行大致的分类,这也是由其自身的约束范围和约束能力所决定的;第二章采取了一个现象学的视角,探讨了在制定法无能为力的情况下,风俗习惯对法律提供补充的可能性,在本章的讨论中,除了埃塞尔的现象学观点之外,埃利希的“活法”理论可以为风俗习惯和现象学的观察方法提供一种很好的衔接,因为埃利希将观察的对象进行了例举:法的事实本身、纯粹作为事实的法条以及导致法形成的所有社会之力;第三章从方法论的视角讨论了风俗习惯进入到法律视野之中的几个理论切入点,从法律条文的解释、法律论证中的小前提形成以及利益衡量等方面对这一问题进行了深入的分析;第四章从具体适用的角度探讨了实质上和程序上为风俗习惯的适用提供保障所应该注意的问题:除了要对适用的风俗习惯进行筛选鉴别之外,在适用的过程中也要坚持一些基本原则。另外,出于司法效率的考量,在实践中对善良风俗习惯进行归纳汇编,并开始在基层组织中由点及面的逐步试验推进,都是行之有效的方法。希望通过这样的理论探讨能够为司法实践贡献些许力量。
[Abstract]:In judicial practice, the comprehensive consideration of customs and customs has begun to appear in the judgment, which has led to intense discussion on the application of customs in the academic and judicial fields. It should be said that the judicial application of customs and customs is an important embodiment of modern rule of law that accommodates multiple values and cultures, and in the field of judicial practice, the ability of customs to resolve disputes cannot be ignored. However, it often causes a series of disputes because of its position as an informal source of law. The purpose of this article is to find some theoretical support for the application of customs in judicial practice. The first chapter of this paper, the concept of customs and customs, characteristics of discrimination. As a kind of native resources, custom is more embodied in the attribute of knowledge and tradition. As a folk code of conduct, we can try to classify the customs and customs roughly from the regional and normative levels. This is also determined by its own constraint scope and ability; The second chapter takes a phenomenological perspective and probes into the possibility of adding customs to the law when the law is powerless. In the discussion of this chapter, besides Ethel's phenomenological point of view, Ehrlich's "living method" theory can provide a good link between customs and phenomenological methods of observation, because Ehrlich cites the object of observation: the fact of the law itself. The articles of law purely as facts and the forces of all societies that lead to the formation of the law; The third chapter discusses several theoretical entry points from the perspective of methodology, from the interpretation of legal provisions, and discusses several theoretical entry points in which customs and customs enter the legal field of vision. In legal argumentation, the formation of small premise and the measurement of interests are deeply analyzed. The fourth chapter discusses the problems that should be paid attention to in essence and procedure in providing protection for the application of customs and customs from the point of view of specific application: in addition to screening and identifying the applicable customs and customs, In the process of application, we should also adhere to some basic principles. In addition, due to the consideration of judicial efficiency, it is an effective method to summarize and compile good customs and habits in practice, and to begin to carry out gradual experiments in grass-roots organizations. Hope that through such a theoretical discussion can contribute some strength for judicial practice.
【学位授予单位】：中国政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D90
本文编号：2465755
[Abstract]:In judicial practice, the comprehensive consideration of customs and customs has begun to appear in the judgment, which has led to intense discussion on the application of customs in the academic and judicial fields. It should be said that the judicial application of customs and customs is an important embodiment of modern rule of law that accommodates multiple values and cultures, and in the field of judicial practice, the ability of customs to resolve disputes cannot be ignored. However, it often causes a series of disputes because of its position as an informal source of law. The purpose of this article is to find some theoretical support for the application of customs in judicial practice. The first chapter of this paper, the concept of customs and customs, characteristics of discrimination. As a kind of native resources, custom is more embodied in the attribute of knowledge and tradition. As a folk code of conduct, we can try to classify the customs and customs roughly from the regional and normative levels. This is also determined by its own constraint scope and ability; The second chapter takes a phenomenological perspective and probes into the possibility of adding customs to the law when the law is powerless. In the discussion of this chapter, besides Ethel's phenomenological point of view, Ehrlich's "living method" theory can provide a good link between customs and phenomenological methods of observation, because Ehrlich cites the object of observation: the fact of the law itself. The articles of law purely as facts and the forces of all societies that lead to the formation of the law; The third chapter discusses several theoretical entry points from the perspective of methodology, from the interpretation of legal provisions, and discusses several theoretical entry points in which customs and customs enter the legal field of vision. In legal argumentation, the formation of small premise and the measurement of interests are deeply analyzed. The fourth chapter discusses the problems that should be paid attention to in essence and procedure in providing protection for the application of customs and customs from the point of view of specific application: in addition to screening and identifying the applicable customs and customs, In the process of application, we should also adhere to some basic principles. In addition, due to the consideration of judicial efficiency, it is an effective method to summarize and compile good customs and habits in practice, and to begin to carry out gradual experiments in grass-roots organizations. Hope that through such a theoretical discussion can contribute some strength for judicial practice.
【学位授予单位】：中国政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D90
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前9条
1 梁剑兵;;对转型时期中国法学的提问——兼评苏力《也许正在发生》[J];北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2006年S1期
2 杜江涌;浅析民俗在制定法中的贯彻[J];重庆社会科学;2004年01期
3 范愉;从司法实践的视角看经济全球化与我国法制建设——论法与社会的互动[J];法律科学.西北政法学院学报;2005年01期
4 厉尽国;;法律论证何以为法律辩护[J];内蒙古社会科学(汉文版);2007年04期
5 张利春;;关于利益衡量的两种知识——兼行比较德国、日本的民法解释学[J];法制与社会发展;2006年05期
6 王晓葵;;“风俗”概念的近代嬗变[J];文化遗产;2010年03期
7 谢晖;;初论民间规范对法律方法的可能贡献[J];现代法学;2006年05期
8 徐清宇;周永军;;民俗习惯在司法中的运行条件及障碍消除[J];中国法学;2008年02期
9 钟晓奇;;国家法与民间法之冲突——读《无需法律的秩序》所感[J];中共郑州市委党校学报;2006年01期
，本文编号：2465755
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/falilunwen/2465755.html
