对崔某诉东营市某医院“不当出生”案的分析
发布时间：2019-04-28 06:36
【摘要】：“不当出生”这一概念最早源于美国侵权法,是指怀孕妇女到医院进行产前检查,因医疗机构未尽合理注意义务使得应当检查出来的胎儿存在的先天性缺陷而未能检查出来或未尽告知义务,从而导致缺陷儿出生。缺陷儿的父母针对医疗机构的过失提出的损害赔偿诉讼被称为不当出生之诉。从1967年美国出现第一例不当出生诉讼案件Gleitman v. Cosgrove案至今,近半个世纪的时间过去了,此类纠纷涉及的法律问题如不当出生之诉的请求权基础是什么、原告的何种权利受到损害、被侵害权利的属性、对医疗机构过失的认定、损害赔偿范围的确定等,目前仍存在诸多争议,而实务中对此类纠纷的判决结果也大相径庭。基于此,研究不当出生诉讼案件的争议焦点仍然具有重要的意义。 除引言与结语外,文章共分为三个部分。 引言部分主要介绍了本文写作的背景、意义、方法以及此类案件的研究现状。 第一部分主要介绍了本文所要讨论的案例以及该案引发的争议焦点。 第二部分运用相关的法学理论对本案的争议焦点进行了分析：本案的请求权基础是什么、医疗机构是否侵犯了原告的知情权,并运用实证分析方法对医疗机构是否存在医疗过失进行了分析。 第三部分主要从赔偿范围方面阐述了医疗机构在此类诉讼中应承担的赔偿责任。 结论部分笔者重申了对本案争议焦点所持的观点,并在此基础上提出了自己的建议。 第二部分是本文的重点。
[Abstract]:The concept of "improper birth" first originated in United States tort law, meaning that pregnant women go to hospitals for prenatal care. Due to the failure of the medical institution to exercise its duty of reasonable care, the congenital defect of the fetus that should be examined is not examined or the obligation of notification is not fulfilled, which leads to the birth of the defective child. A lawsuit for damages filed by the parents of a defective child against the negligence of a medical institution is referred to as a claim of improper birth. Nearly half a century has passed since the first improper birth lawsuit in the United States, Gleitman v. Cosgrove, in 1967. What are the legal issues involved in such disputes, such as the basis of the claim for improper birth? There are still many disputes about which rights of the plaintiff have been damaged, the attribute of the infringed rights, the determination of the negligence of medical institutions, the determination of the scope of damages, and so on, and the judgment results of such disputes are also very different in practice. Therefore, it is still of great significance to study the dispute focus of improper birth litigation. In addition to the introduction and conclusion, the article is divided into three parts. The introduction mainly introduces the background, significance, methods and the research status of this kind of cases. The first part mainly introduces the cases to be discussed in this paper and the controversial focus of the case. The second part analyzes the focus of the dispute in this case by using the relevant legal theory: what is the basis of the right of claim in this case, and whether the medical institution infringes the plaintiff's right to know? And the empirical analysis method is used to analyze the existence of medical negligence in medical institutions. The third part mainly expounds the liability of medical institutions in this kind of litigation from the scope of compensation. In conclusion, the author reiterates his views on the focus of the dispute, and puts forward his own suggestions on this basis. The second part is the focus of this paper.
【学位授予单位】：兰州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D920.5;D923;D922.16
本文编号：2467402
[Abstract]:The concept of "improper birth" first originated in United States tort law, meaning that pregnant women go to hospitals for prenatal care. Due to the failure of the medical institution to exercise its duty of reasonable care, the congenital defect of the fetus that should be examined is not examined or the obligation of notification is not fulfilled, which leads to the birth of the defective child. A lawsuit for damages filed by the parents of a defective child against the negligence of a medical institution is referred to as a claim of improper birth. Nearly half a century has passed since the first improper birth lawsuit in the United States, Gleitman v. Cosgrove, in 1967. What are the legal issues involved in such disputes, such as the basis of the claim for improper birth? There are still many disputes about which rights of the plaintiff have been damaged, the attribute of the infringed rights, the determination of the negligence of medical institutions, the determination of the scope of damages, and so on, and the judgment results of such disputes are also very different in practice. Therefore, it is still of great significance to study the dispute focus of improper birth litigation. In addition to the introduction and conclusion, the article is divided into three parts. The introduction mainly introduces the background, significance, methods and the research status of this kind of cases. The first part mainly introduces the cases to be discussed in this paper and the controversial focus of the case. The second part analyzes the focus of the dispute in this case by using the relevant legal theory: what is the basis of the right of claim in this case, and whether the medical institution infringes the plaintiff's right to know? And the empirical analysis method is used to analyze the existence of medical negligence in medical institutions. The third part mainly expounds the liability of medical institutions in this kind of litigation from the scope of compensation. In conclusion, the author reiterates his views on the focus of the dispute, and puts forward his own suggestions on this basis. The second part is the focus of this paper.
【学位授予单位】：兰州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D920.5;D923;D922.16
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 尹海文;;论父母对“不当出生”者之损害赔偿请求权[J];法律与医学杂志;2006年02期
2 杨立新;王玲芳;;试论中医师的告知义务及违反告知义务的责任[J];甘肃政法学院学报;2007年06期
3 田野;;“不当出生”诉讼初探——透过生命价值的迷雾看赔偿正义[J];广西大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2007年04期
4 杨立新,王海英,孙博;人身权的延伸法律保护[J];法学研究;1995年02期
5 陈春;;论“不当出生”之侵权损害赔偿[J];理论导报;2008年04期
6 艾尔肯;;论医疗过失的判断标准[J];辽宁师范大学学报(社会科学版);2007年03期
7 陈现杰;;因产前检查疏失导致缺陷儿出生的,医疗机构应否承担侵权责任[J];人民司法;2009年03期
8 赵明华;;医疗损害纠纷案件适用侵权责任法初探[J];人民司法;2010年11期
9 金福海;邵冰雪;;错误出生损害赔偿问题探讨[J];法学论坛;2006年06期
10 杨志强;;“不当出生”医患纠纷中的赔偿责任——曲某诉某市计划生育服务站医疗损害赔偿纠纷案[J];山东审判;2007年05期
相关硕士学位论文 前4条
1 徐艳阳;医疗过失责任研究[D];安徽大学;2003年
2 徐锋剑;医疗损害赔偿若干问题研究[D];吉林大学;2007年
3 邹玉萍;产前诊断失误之损害赔偿责任研究[D];西南政法大学;2008年
4 林静;“不当出生”之诉问题研究[D];烟台大学;2008年
，本文编号：2467402
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/falilunwen/2467402.html
