论结果客观归责中的溯责禁止
发布时间：2019-04-28 12:11
【摘要】：溯责禁止是一种在特殊犯罪类型中排除结果溯责于前行为人的规范性、技术性规则,具有教义学和刑事政策上的要求和根据,其理论体系呈现出"兴起于限制因果关系、活跃于客观归责论语境,以及目前创新于构成要件界限和答责排除事由"的演变轨迹。宜根据所介入的行为因素为标准分为第三人行为介入和被害人行为介入两大类探讨结果在客观上的归责问题。在溯责禁止的适用层面,应该以归责关联性为判断总基准,考察因果关联性和意志自由关联性两项前提条件,以风险实现关联性为核心标准,以规范目的关联性为补充规则。
[Abstract]:The retroactive prohibition is a normative, technical rule which excludes the result traceability from the former actor in the special type of crime. It has the requirements and basis of the doctrine and criminal policy, and its theoretical system presents the "rise in the limitation of causation." It is active in the context of objective attribution theory, as well as the evolution track of innovation in the limits of constituent elements and the exclusion of liability. According to the behavior factors involved, it should be divided into two categories: the intervention of the third party and the intervention of the victim, and the objective imputation of the results. In the application aspect of retroactive prohibition, the relevance of imputation should be taken as the general criterion of judgment, the two preconditions of causal relevance and free will relevance should be examined, the core criterion should be the relevance of risk realization, and the supplementary rule should be the relevance of normative purpose.
【作者单位】： 武汉大学法学院;
【分类号】：D90
本文编号：2467617
[Abstract]:The retroactive prohibition is a normative, technical rule which excludes the result traceability from the former actor in the special type of crime. It has the requirements and basis of the doctrine and criminal policy, and its theoretical system presents the "rise in the limitation of causation." It is active in the context of objective attribution theory, as well as the evolution track of innovation in the limits of constituent elements and the exclusion of liability. According to the behavior factors involved, it should be divided into two categories: the intervention of the third party and the intervention of the victim, and the objective imputation of the results. In the application aspect of retroactive prohibition, the relevance of imputation should be taken as the general criterion of judgment, the two preconditions of causal relevance and free will relevance should be examined, the core criterion should be the relevance of risk realization, and the supplementary rule should be the relevance of normative purpose.
【作者单位】： 武汉大学法学院;
【分类号】：D90
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前3条
1 刘之玮;;前行为的瑕疵已补救 不影响后行为的效力[J];人民司法;2010年06期
2 张明楷;;事后抢劫的共犯[J];政法论坛;2008年01期
3 ;[J];;年期
，本文编号：2467617
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/falilunwen/2467617.html
