风险控制的部门法思路及其超越
发布时间：2019-05-08 02:44
【摘要】：现代工业化引发的环境、健康、安全等公共风险极为特殊,风险控制已不再是纯粹的私法自治议题。作为回应,不断发展中的民法、刑法和行政法均将公共风险纳入其调整范围。但由于部门法壁垒的存在,中国"三足鼎立"的风险立法在运行层面呈现出"各自为政"的局面。这无助于风险控制工具之间的协调与合作。借助法经济学的体系化解释技术,散乱分布于各部门法的风险控制工具可被纳入统一的分析框架。这不仅有助于打破部门法壁垒,而且能将各部门法上的风险控制工具体系化整合为"三位一体"的结构。构建这一法律结构首先要打造开放的部门法体系,其次要在部门法体系之外,借助行业单行立法搭建部门法之间的合作桥梁,风险立法由此呈现出部门法"分"与"合"的双重变奏。
[Abstract]:The environment, health, safety and other public risks caused by modern industrialization are very special, and risk control is no longer a purely private law autonomy issue. In response, the evolving civil law, criminal law and administrative law all include public risk in its adjustment scope. However, due to the existence of sectoral legal barriers, China's "three-legged" risk legislation in the operational level presents a "separate government" situation. This is not conducive to coordination and cooperation among risk control tools. By means of systematized interpretation techniques of law economics, risk control tools scattered in various branches of law can be integrated into a unified analytical framework. This not only helps to break down the sectoral legal barriers, but also can systematize the risk control tools in various sectors into a "trinity" structure. To construct this legal structure, first of all, we should build an open department law system, and second, we should build a bridge of cooperation between department laws with the aid of industry single-line legislation outside the department law system. As a result, the risk legislation presents a double variation of "division" and "combination".
【作者单位】： 南京大学法学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金重大项目“民生视野下食品安全治理的法治化”(14ZDC028);国家社会科学基金青年项目“公共风险管控的公私法合作机制研究”(15CFX020)的前期成果
【分类号】：D910
本文编号：2471560
[Abstract]:The environment, health, safety and other public risks caused by modern industrialization are very special, and risk control is no longer a purely private law autonomy issue. In response, the evolving civil law, criminal law and administrative law all include public risk in its adjustment scope. However, due to the existence of sectoral legal barriers, China's "three-legged" risk legislation in the operational level presents a "separate government" situation. This is not conducive to coordination and cooperation among risk control tools. By means of systematized interpretation techniques of law economics, risk control tools scattered in various branches of law can be integrated into a unified analytical framework. This not only helps to break down the sectoral legal barriers, but also can systematize the risk control tools in various sectors into a "trinity" structure. To construct this legal structure, first of all, we should build an open department law system, and second, we should build a bridge of cooperation between department laws with the aid of industry single-line legislation outside the department law system. As a result, the risk legislation presents a double variation of "division" and "combination".
【作者单位】： 南京大学法学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金重大项目“民生视野下食品安全治理的法治化”(14ZDC028);国家社会科学基金青年项目“公共风险管控的公私法合作机制研究”(15CFX020)的前期成果
【分类号】：D910
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 翟宁娟;;部门法的成长逻辑与法的社会性趋向[J];社科纵横;2007年08期
2 叶必丰;论部门法的划分[J];法学评论;1996年03期
3 余俊;黄莹;;部门法理学属性辨析[J];甘肃社会科学;2014年01期
4 田洪生;法律体系及部门法[J];河北自学考试;1998年09期
5 王云霞;;部门法在西方的分离[J];法律文化研究;2005年00期
6 吴木銮;;立法咋变成了“部门法”[J];中国经济周刊;2006年45期
7 何文杰;;部门法理论革新论[J];兰州大学学报(社会科学版);2007年04期
8 翟宁娟;;法的社会性的历史诉求与现实趋向——以部门法的成长为视角[J];法制与社会;2007年11期
9 刘长秋;;论生命法的独立部门法地位——兼对我国生命法学研究的未来展望[J];东方法学;2008年05期
10 朱翠微;;部门法理论的批判与重构[J];长春市委党校学报;2010年05期
相关重要报纸文章 前3条
1 山东省枣庄市中级人民法院 李文;回到法理的门前[N];人民法院报;2011年
2 朱景文 中国人民大学法学院;在合与分之间[N];中国社会科学报;2009年
3 肖君拥 刘成伟;划分法律部门不应只有一个标准[N];检察日报;2003年
，本文编号：2471560
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/falilunwen/2471560.html
