韩国补贴与反补贴法律制度研究
发布时间：2019-05-20 16:45
【摘要】：人口数量和资源等客观因素决定了韩国的内需不足，因此韩国制定了以出口为导向的经济发展模式。早在20世纪60年代中期，韩国就确立了“出口第一”和“贸易立国”的基本国策。韩国的对外贸易依存度1非常高，在2010年甚至达到了87.9%。2在中韩进出口贸易方面，韩国是中国第三大贸易伙伴国、第三大出口对象国和第二大进口来源国，3中国则是韩国第一大贸易伙伴。随着国际市场竞争日益激烈，中国越来越多地遭到韩国的反倾销调查以及反倾销措施。虽然韩国还没有对中国发起反补贴调查的实践，但在国际反补贴措施方兴未艾，“双反”措施层出不穷之际，对韩国的补贴与反补贴制度进行研究，可为中国应对韩国将来的反补贴调查提供参考和借鉴。 本文是国内第一篇全面介绍韩国补贴与反补贴制度的论文。我国对韩国反倾销制度的研究始于上个世纪，4但截至今日，，还没有关于韩国补贴与反补贴制度方面的研究。从国际层面来看，反倾销案件的数量十倍于反补贴，研究反倾销制度更具现实意义。特别是韩国尚无实施反补贴措施的实践,而只是规定准用反倾销措施程序，这也是有关韩国反补贴制度的研究较少的一个原因。但是自21世纪初以来，加拿大、美国等国家开始对中国采取反补贴措施甚至“双反”措施。在这种情况下，对中国主要贸易对象国的补贴与反补贴制度研究成为必须。 论文在第一章分析了韩国补贴与反补贴制度的立法体系及发展史，全面介绍了韩国反补贴机构的职能与历史沿革。论文第二章以韩国《关税法》、《关税法施行令》、《关税法施行规则》等法律法规以及贸易委员会发布的法律文件为依据，并结合WTO的《SCM协定》，采用比较分析与法律条文分析的方法，介绍韩国的反补贴法律实体制度。第三章研究韩国的补贴与反补贴程序制度。第四章说明了韩国反补贴制度的实践情况，分析了韩国对反补贴制度的政策立场，对其将来的情况做出了合理的预测。论文参考了大量法律法规、文献、期刊、学位论文、案例及网站资料。
[Abstract]:Objective factors such as population and resources determine the shortage of domestic demand in South Korea, so South Korea has formulated an export-oriented economic development model. As early as the mid-1960 s, South Korea established the basic national policy of "export first" and "trade nation". South Korea's dependence on foreign trade is very high, reaching 87.9% in 2010. In terms of import and export trade between China and South Korea, South Korea is China's third largest trading partner, the third largest export target country and the second largest source of imports. China, on the other hand, is South Korea's largest trading partner. With the increasingly fierce competition in the international market, China is more and more subjected to anti-dumping investigations and anti-dumping measures by South Korea. Although South Korea has not yet launched a countervailing investigation into China, at a time when international countervailing measures are in the ascendant and "double countervailing" measures emerge in endlessly, the subsidy and countervailing system in South Korea has been studied. It can provide reference and reference for China to deal with South Korea's future countervailing investigation. This paper is the first comprehensive introduction of Korean subsidy and countervailing system in China. The study of Korean anti-dumping system in China began in the last century, but up to now, there is no research on Korean subsidy and countervailing system. From the international point of view, the number of anti-dumping cases is ten times that of countervailing, so it is of more practical significance to study the anti-dumping system. In particular, South Korea has not yet implemented countervailing measures, but only stipulates the procedure of allowing anti-dumping measures, which is also one of the reasons for the lack of research on South Korea's countervailing system. But since the beginning of the 21st century, Canada, the United States and other countries have begun to take countervailing measures or even "double countervailing" measures against China. In this case, it is necessary to study the subsidy and countervailing system of China's major trade target countries. In the first chapter, the paper analyzes the legislative system and development history of Korean subsidy and countervailing system, and comprehensively introduces the functions and historical evolution of Korean countervailing agency. The second chapter of the paper is based on the Korean Customs Law, the Customs Law Enforcement order, the Customs Law Enforcement rules and other laws and regulations, as well as the legal documents issued by the Trade Commission, and combined with the SCM Agreement of the WTO. This paper introduces the countervailing legal entity system in Korea by means of comparative analysis and legal provisions analysis. The third chapter studies the subsidy and countervailing procedure system in Korea. The fourth chapter explains the practice of Korean countervailing system, analyzes South Korea's policy position on countervailing system, and makes a reasonable prediction of its future situation. The paper refers to a large number of laws and regulations, literature, journals, degree papers, cases and website materials.
【学位授予单位】：中国社会科学院研究生院
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D931.26;DD912.29
本文编号：2481791
[Abstract]:Objective factors such as population and resources determine the shortage of domestic demand in South Korea, so South Korea has formulated an export-oriented economic development model. As early as the mid-1960 s, South Korea established the basic national policy of "export first" and "trade nation". South Korea's dependence on foreign trade is very high, reaching 87.9% in 2010. In terms of import and export trade between China and South Korea, South Korea is China's third largest trading partner, the third largest export target country and the second largest source of imports. China, on the other hand, is South Korea's largest trading partner. With the increasingly fierce competition in the international market, China is more and more subjected to anti-dumping investigations and anti-dumping measures by South Korea. Although South Korea has not yet launched a countervailing investigation into China, at a time when international countervailing measures are in the ascendant and "double countervailing" measures emerge in endlessly, the subsidy and countervailing system in South Korea has been studied. It can provide reference and reference for China to deal with South Korea's future countervailing investigation. This paper is the first comprehensive introduction of Korean subsidy and countervailing system in China. The study of Korean anti-dumping system in China began in the last century, but up to now, there is no research on Korean subsidy and countervailing system. From the international point of view, the number of anti-dumping cases is ten times that of countervailing, so it is of more practical significance to study the anti-dumping system. In particular, South Korea has not yet implemented countervailing measures, but only stipulates the procedure of allowing anti-dumping measures, which is also one of the reasons for the lack of research on South Korea's countervailing system. But since the beginning of the 21st century, Canada, the United States and other countries have begun to take countervailing measures or even "double countervailing" measures against China. In this case, it is necessary to study the subsidy and countervailing system of China's major trade target countries. In the first chapter, the paper analyzes the legislative system and development history of Korean subsidy and countervailing system, and comprehensively introduces the functions and historical evolution of Korean countervailing agency. The second chapter of the paper is based on the Korean Customs Law, the Customs Law Enforcement order, the Customs Law Enforcement rules and other laws and regulations, as well as the legal documents issued by the Trade Commission, and combined with the SCM Agreement of the WTO. This paper introduces the countervailing legal entity system in Korea by means of comparative analysis and legal provisions analysis. The third chapter studies the subsidy and countervailing procedure system in Korea. The fourth chapter explains the practice of Korean countervailing system, analyzes South Korea's policy position on countervailing system, and makes a reasonable prediction of its future situation. The paper refers to a large number of laws and regulations, literature, journals, degree papers, cases and website materials.
【学位授予单位】：中国社会科学院研究生院
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D931.26;DD912.29
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前6条
1 戴仲川;国际反倾销法中的行政复审机制探析[J];华侨大学学报(哲学社会科学版);1999年04期
2 任虎;马光;;中韩反倾销案中“期终复审”制度的比较研究[J];华东理工大学学报(社会科学版);2011年01期
3 刘欢;日本、韩国反倾销法律制度的启示与借鉴[J];中国石油和化工;2001年11期
4 栾信杰;论韩国反倾销法[J];外国经济与管理;1997年06期
5 李哲焕;韩国反倾销法的不足与完善[J];浙江工商大学学报;2004年05期
6 ;韩国反倾销法律制度[J];中国经贸导刊;2000年19期
本文编号：2481791
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/falilunwen/2481791.html
