轮奸行为判例研究
发布时间：2019-06-25 14:22
【摘要】：就我国而言,司法界和学术界对于轮奸案件的认定存在很大的争议。本文坚持判例刑法学的研究方法,以我国现有的司法判决为依据,在理论联系实践的基础上,主要从理论和司法实务两个层面对轮奸行为进行把握,以对轮奸行为的定性和对轮奸行为人的量刑为主要内容,并以两种不同的犯罪论体系在认定特殊的轮奸行为上的差异为视角,以求在合理解决轮奸行为的理论定性的前提下更好的指导我国的司法实践。 具体而言,本文研究的内容包括下列部分:第一,由一例强奸案出发,引申出轮奸行为在司法实务认定中存在的法理疑惑;第二,以司法实践中对轮奸行为认定的争议为基点,上升到对轮奸行为的理论定性探讨,认为轮奸行为是具有独立犯罪构成的定罪情节,并在此基础上分析了轮奸行为的构成要件,认为轮奸不限于轮流奸淫,二人以上基于各自奸淫的目的轮流实施了强奸罪手段行为或者目的行为之一的,均成立轮奸行为;第三,在解决了轮奸行为的理论定性的基础上,进一步认为,在司法实务中,应当正确区分轮奸行为人的手段行为和目的行为,重视对轮奸行为犯罪故意的认定,并就实务中多人实施强奸犯罪如何认定轮奸行为的问题提出了个人的观点;第四,分析亲手犯理论在我国共同犯罪中没有存在的余地,我国在轮奸案件的认定上,应当坚守共犯理论的根基,轮奸案件中既未遂形态不能并存;第五,在对行为定性的基础上,上升到对行为人的量刑问题研究,由对轮奸行为本身的研究上升到对轮奸行为人量刑的探讨,在轮奸行为人的量刑问题上,笔者认为,我国司法部门走的是主从犯的量刑便利主义道路;应当区分个别行为人的行为未遂和整个犯罪的犯罪未遂,并以个别行为人的行为未遂作为认定其属于从犯的主要参考依据;最后,笔者就轮奸行为的未完成形态标准问题提出了个人的思考,认为在轮奸行为独立为一个新罪名的立法前提下,我们研究轮奸行为的犯罪构成和未完成标准才更有意义。
[Abstract]:As far as our country is concerned, there is a great controversy over the identification of gang rape cases in the judicial and academic circles. This paper adheres to the research methods of case criminal law, based on the existing judicial decisions in our country, and on the basis of linking theory with practice, mainly grasps gang rape from two aspects of theory and judicial practice, takes the characterization of gang rape and the sentencing of gang rape as the main content, and takes the differences of two different crime theory systems in identifying special gang rape. In order to better guide the judicial practice of our country under the premise of reasonably solving the theory of gang rape. Specifically, the contents of this paper include the following parts: first, starting from a rape case, the legal doubts existing in the judicial practice of gang rape are derived; Second, based on the dispute over the cognizance of gang rape in judicial practice, it rises to the theoretical qualitative discussion of gang rape, holds that gang rape is a conviction plot with independent criminal constitution, and on this basis, analyzes the constituent elements of gang rape, and holds that gang rape is not limited to rotation adultery, and that more than two people have committed one of the acts of rape crime or purpose in turn on the basis of their own adultery. Group rape was established in all cases. Thirdly, on the basis of solving the theoretical qualitative analysis of gang rape, it is further believed that in judicial practice, we should correctly distinguish the means, behavior and purpose of gang rape, attach importance to the intentional identification of gang rape, and put forward some personal views on how to identify gang rape in practice. Fourth, there is no room for the theory of hand-committed crime in the joint crime of our country. In the identification of gang rape cases, we should adhere to the foundation of the theory of accomplice, and the attempted form can not coexist in gang rape cases. Fifth, on the basis of the qualitative analysis of the behavior, it rises to the study of the sentencing of the perpetrator, from the study of the gang rape itself to the discussion of the sentencing of the gang rape perpetrator. On the sentencing of the gang rape actor, the author believes that the judicial department of our country has taken the road of sentencing convenience of the principal and accomplice. We should distinguish between the attempted behavior of individual perpetrator and the attempted crime of the whole crime, and take the attempted behavior of individual actor as the main reference basis to identify it as an accomplice. Finally, the author puts forward personal thinking on the unfinished form standard of gang rape, and holds that under the premise that gang rape is independent as a new charge, it is more meaningful for us to study the criminal constitution and unfinished standard of gang rape.
【学位授予单位】：中国政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D924.3;D920.5
本文编号：2505749
[Abstract]:As far as our country is concerned, there is a great controversy over the identification of gang rape cases in the judicial and academic circles. This paper adheres to the research methods of case criminal law, based on the existing judicial decisions in our country, and on the basis of linking theory with practice, mainly grasps gang rape from two aspects of theory and judicial practice, takes the characterization of gang rape and the sentencing of gang rape as the main content, and takes the differences of two different crime theory systems in identifying special gang rape. In order to better guide the judicial practice of our country under the premise of reasonably solving the theory of gang rape. Specifically, the contents of this paper include the following parts: first, starting from a rape case, the legal doubts existing in the judicial practice of gang rape are derived; Second, based on the dispute over the cognizance of gang rape in judicial practice, it rises to the theoretical qualitative discussion of gang rape, holds that gang rape is a conviction plot with independent criminal constitution, and on this basis, analyzes the constituent elements of gang rape, and holds that gang rape is not limited to rotation adultery, and that more than two people have committed one of the acts of rape crime or purpose in turn on the basis of their own adultery. Group rape was established in all cases. Thirdly, on the basis of solving the theoretical qualitative analysis of gang rape, it is further believed that in judicial practice, we should correctly distinguish the means, behavior and purpose of gang rape, attach importance to the intentional identification of gang rape, and put forward some personal views on how to identify gang rape in practice. Fourth, there is no room for the theory of hand-committed crime in the joint crime of our country. In the identification of gang rape cases, we should adhere to the foundation of the theory of accomplice, and the attempted form can not coexist in gang rape cases. Fifth, on the basis of the qualitative analysis of the behavior, it rises to the study of the sentencing of the perpetrator, from the study of the gang rape itself to the discussion of the sentencing of the gang rape perpetrator. On the sentencing of the gang rape actor, the author believes that the judicial department of our country has taken the road of sentencing convenience of the principal and accomplice. We should distinguish between the attempted behavior of individual perpetrator and the attempted crime of the whole crime, and take the attempted behavior of individual actor as the main reference basis to identify it as an accomplice. Finally, the author puts forward personal thinking on the unfinished form standard of gang rape, and holds that under the premise that gang rape is independent as a new charge, it is more meaningful for us to study the criminal constitution and unfinished standard of gang rape.
【学位授予单位】：中国政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D924.3;D920.5
【参考文献】
中国期刊全文数据库 前10条
1 杜晓明;;德日犯罪论体系与我国犯罪论体系的关系[J];重庆科技学院学报(社会科学版);2010年20期
2 李可;李晓明;;犯罪构成·犯罪成立·犯罪——对刑法学三大基本范畴关系的审视与重构[J];福建法学;2001年02期
3 刘洪;;两类犯罪参与体系理论比较研究——兼评我国刑法的犯罪参与体系[J];福建公安高等专科学校学报;2007年05期
4 马克昌;改进中国刑法学研究之我见[J];法商研究;2003年03期
5 高铭暄;谈谈如何指导博士研究生的点滴体会[J];法学杂志;2005年02期
6 王俊平;;“共同实行犯的既遂与未遂形态并存说”之质疑[J];法学评论;2009年02期
7 刘士心;;论亲手犯[J];刑法论丛;2007年01期
8 吴君霞;朱凤翔;;解读修正的犯罪构成[J];四川警官高等专科学校学报;2006年02期
9 王志祥;;情节加重犯基本问题研究[J];政法论丛;2007年05期
10 张明楷;;法定刑升格条件的认识[J];政法论坛;2009年05期
，本文编号：2505749
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/falilunwen/2505749.html
