法治唯理主义建构及其批判
发布时间：2019-07-04 06:22
【摘要】：唯理主义是传统理性主义极端化的变体,古希腊罗马时代就有唯理主义的传统,而近代,随着科学技术的发展,社会的进步和变革的加剧,需要迅速产生规则来适应和维持社会的秩序,这为唯理主义法治建构理论提供了适合的时代背景。现代法治国家建构本身作为一个理性的活动必定需要理性的参与,理性对于制度的构建确实发挥着重大的作用。但重大并非唯一,理性并非万能。如果迷信理性,认为理性能够掌控、计划人类社会的一切事务,必将陷入唯理主义的泥淖,以为法律就是“以立法统合整个法律”,加上具有组织化政府的偏向推进,社会秩序将呈现出一元的法治秩序,而去除了习惯、风俗等社会内部产生的秩序形式,这与真实的秩序形态不符。这也将带来侵蚀自由,过度精英化,脱离真实生活的恶果。尊重理性,尊重人类生活就需要现代法治国家谨防唯理主义“元意识形态”支配下的法治建构,防范夸大知识和理性的作用,防范唯理主义的法治秩序观,这对当下中国的法治建构尤具意义。
[Abstract]:Rationalism is a variant of the extremes of traditional rationalism. In ancient Greece and Rome, there was the tradition of rationalism. In modern times, with the development of science and technology and the aggravation of social progress and change, it is necessary to produce rules quickly to adapt to and maintain the social order, which provides a suitable background for the construction theory of rationalism under the rule of law. The construction of modern country ruled by law itself as a rational activity must need rational participation, rationality does play an important role in the construction of the system. But great is not the only, reason is not omnipotent. If we believe that reason can control and plan all the affairs of human society, we will certainly fall into the quagmire of rationalism, thinking that the law is "integrating the whole law with legislation". In addition, with the bias of an organized government, the social order will present a unitary order of the rule of law, and the form of order produced within the society, such as habits and customs, will be removed. This is inconsistent with the real form of order. This will also lead to the erosion of freedom, excessive elitism, away from the consequences of real life. Respecting reason and human life requires modern countries ruled by law to guard against the construction of the rule of law under the domination of rationalism "meta-ideology", to prevent exaggerating the role of knowledge and reason, and to prevent the view of order of rule of law of rationalism, which is of particular significance to the construction of the rule of law in China at present.
【学位授予单位】：南京大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D90
本文编号：2509700
[Abstract]:Rationalism is a variant of the extremes of traditional rationalism. In ancient Greece and Rome, there was the tradition of rationalism. In modern times, with the development of science and technology and the aggravation of social progress and change, it is necessary to produce rules quickly to adapt to and maintain the social order, which provides a suitable background for the construction theory of rationalism under the rule of law. The construction of modern country ruled by law itself as a rational activity must need rational participation, rationality does play an important role in the construction of the system. But great is not the only, reason is not omnipotent. If we believe that reason can control and plan all the affairs of human society, we will certainly fall into the quagmire of rationalism, thinking that the law is "integrating the whole law with legislation". In addition, with the bias of an organized government, the social order will present a unitary order of the rule of law, and the form of order produced within the society, such as habits and customs, will be removed. This is inconsistent with the real form of order. This will also lead to the erosion of freedom, excessive elitism, away from the consequences of real life. Respecting reason and human life requires modern countries ruled by law to guard against the construction of the rule of law under the domination of rationalism "meta-ideology", to prevent exaggerating the role of knowledge and reason, and to prevent the view of order of rule of law of rationalism, which is of particular significance to the construction of the rule of law in China at present.
【学位授予单位】：南京大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D90
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 邓正来;;社会秩序规则二元观——哈耶克法律理论的研究[J];北大法律评论;1999年02期
2 贾中海;苏丽华;;理性与社会发展秩序[J];中共长春市委党校学报;2006年03期
3 邓正来;哈耶克批判的前提性准备 著译者言[J];读书;2003年04期
4 刘建军;当代中国政治思潮的兴起与变迁[J];华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2003年03期
5 单中惠;刘亮;;社会精英与统治秩序：西方雄辩家教育的阐释与诉求[J];华东师范大学学报(教育科学版);2008年02期
6 周安平;;许霆案的民意:按照大数法则的分析[J];中外法学;2009年01期
7 苏力;《无需法律的秩序》[J];环球法律评论;2004年01期
8 陈坤;;论价值领域内的智识可能性[J];学术月刊;2007年09期
9 乔瑞华;;笛卡尔“上帝存在”证明与其理性主义哲学的关系[J];理论学习;2008年01期
10 高鸿钧;;法律移植:隐喻、范式与全球化时代的新趋向[J];中国社会科学;2007年04期
，本文编号：2509700
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/falilunwen/2509700.html
