设区的市立法权设置存在的问题及应对之策
发布时间：2019-08-08 16:59
【摘要】：创制一种能够服务于城市发展的立法体制已成为当今的社会共识。现行《立法法》进一步扩大了地方立法权主体的范围,将地方立法权主体由最初的49个增至282个。从这个角度上讲,中央对地方的"三次分权"的目的就是希望通过立法体制的进一步民主化,提高立法质量,完善地方治理体系。但是,地方立法权限的单向度扩张也可能带来一些制度性的弊端和风险,如地方立法水平问题、地方保护问题、重复立法等问题。要保证设区的市立法发挥预期的社会功效,就必须对地方立法机制或可能存在的风险进行评估,并加强对其立法权风险的防范。防范措施包括:加强对设区的市的立法的监督、优化立法资源配置,提高地方立法水平、建立有效的冲突解决机制等。
[Abstract]:The creation of a legislative system that can serve the development of the city has become the consensus of today's society. The current Legislative Law has further expanded the scope of local legislative subjects and increased the number of local legislative subjects from 49 to 282. From this point of view, the purpose of the "three decentralization" between the central and local governments is to improve the quality of legislation and improve the local governance system through the further democratization of the legislative system. However, the unidirectional expansion of local legislative authority may also bring some institutional drawbacks and risks, such as the level of local legislation, local protection, repeated legislation and so on. In order to ensure the expected social effect of municipal legislation, it is necessary to evaluate the local legislative mechanism or possible risks, and strengthen the prevention of the risks of its legislative power. The preventive measures include strengthening the supervision of the legislation of the cities with districts, optimizing the allocation of legislative resources, improving the level of local legislation, establishing an effective conflict resolution mechanism, and so on.
【作者单位】： 山东社会科学院;
【分类号】：D920.0
[Abstract]:The creation of a legislative system that can serve the development of the city has become the consensus of today's society. The current Legislative Law has further expanded the scope of local legislative subjects and increased the number of local legislative subjects from 49 to 282. From this point of view, the purpose of the "three decentralization" between the central and local governments is to improve the quality of legislation and improve the local governance system through the further democratization of the legislative system. However, the unidirectional expansion of local legislative authority may also bring some institutional drawbacks and risks, such as the level of local legislation, local protection, repeated legislation and so on. In order to ensure the expected social effect of municipal legislation, it is necessary to evaluate the local legislative mechanism or possible risks, and strengthen the prevention of the risks of its legislative power. The preventive measures include strengthening the supervision of the legislation of the cities with districts, optimizing the allocation of legislative resources, improving the level of local legislation, establishing an effective conflict resolution mechanism, and so on.
【作者单位】： 山东社会科学院;
【分类号】：D920.0
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 王淑珍;浅谈地方立法与市场经济发展[J];山西省政法管理干部学院学报;2000年03期
2 卓泽渊;;西部地方立法的意义及其司法运用[J];重庆行政;2000年04期
3 理喻 ,杨子;如何评价地方立法——全国人大法律委员会副主任委员乔晓阳访谈录[J];政府法制;2001年02期
4 徐海明;;面对入世 地方立法应该怎么办[J];中国人大;2002年03期
5 湖北省社会科学院课题组;完善我国地方立法的思考[J];江汉论坛;2003年10期
6 薛向阳;市场经济与我国的地方立法[J];黔东南民族师范高等专科学校学报;2003年04期
7 柳经纬,黄洵;关于地方立法创新问题的思考[J];理论与改革;2004年03期
8 肖辉;论地方立法的三个关系[J];河北法学;2004年11期
9 谢泽光;地方立法在构建社会主义和谐社会中大有作为[J];中国人大;2005年18期
10 肖子策;论地方立法起草方式改革[J];法学;2005年01期
相关会议论文 前10条
1 方世荣;李志，
本文编号：2524489
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/falilunwen/2524489.html
