论律师怎样通过预设获取有利信息

发布时间：2021-03-20 08:53

　　本文通过对律师询问中预设进行分类分析和对其功能的阐释来研究预设的使用范畴和特点,旨在从中探究律师是怎样通过预设这一策略来获取有利信息的。根据尤尔对预设的分类,作者在英汉的庭审材料中分析了这六种预设:存在性预设,语词性预设,结构性预设,事实性预设,非事实性预设,和反事实性预设。律师在询问过程中使用这六种预设主要用于两种策略:预设陷阱策略和信息组织策略。他们的具体分别功能是:麻痹回话者给出有利答案或者导话题和信息流并使其向预期方向发展。作为补充,本文还对不同的预设在不同功能中出现的频率进行了统计。我们希望,本文对律师询问中预设使用的探讨,有助于了解律师询问的特征,并且能有助于律师通过询问更有效地获取有利信息,同时也能够帮助回话者避免预设陷阱,不被律师所控制,提高司法的公正性。 

【文章来源】：广东外语外贸大学广东省

【文章页数】：88 页

【学位级别】：硕士

【文章目录】：
摘要
Abstract
Contents
Chapter Ⅰ Introduction
    1.1 Research topic
    1.2 Background of this thesis
    1.3 Definition of favorable information
    1.4 Rationale
    1.5 Research questions
    1.6 Data and methodology
        1.6.1 Data collection
        1.6.2 Methodology
    1.7 Organization of the thesis
Chapter Ⅱ Literature Review
    2.1 Introduction
    2.2 Overall review of presupposition theory
        2.2.1 The concept of presupposition
        2.2.2 Two approaches of presupposition
    2.3 Classification of presupposition
        2.3.1 Existential presupposition
        2.3.2 Factive presupposition
        2.3.3 Lexical Presupposition
        2.3.4 Structural Presupposition
        2.3.5 Non-factive presupposition
        2.3.6 Counter-factual presupposition
    2.4 Study on lawyers' presupposition in lawyer's inquiry
    2.5 Information structure
    2.6 Summary
Chapter Ⅲ Theoretical Framework
    3.1 Introduction
    3.2 Classification of presuppositions
    3.3 Features of presupposition
        3.3.1 Constancy under negation
        3.3.2 Being latent
        3.3.3 Mutual knowledge
    3.4 The dynamics of presupposition
    3.5 Study on Lawyer's goals
    3.6 Analytical framework
    3.7 Summary
Chapter Ⅳ Presupposition as a strategy for setting up traps
    4.1 Introduction
    4.2 Adoption of presupposition as traps
        4.2.1 Use of Existential Presupposition
        4.2.2 Use of Factive Presupposition
        4.2.3 Use of Lexical Presupposition
        4.2.4 Structural Presupposition
        4.2.5 Non-factive Presupposition
        4.2.6 Counter-factual Presupposition
    4.3 Summary
Chapter Ⅴ Presupposition as a strategy for information organization
    5.1 Introduction
    5.2 Lawyer's goal and information flow
    5.3 Topic initiation by presupposition
    5.4 Leading and controlling information flow by presupposition
    5.5 Observation of presuppositions in each lawyers' inquiry
        5.5.1 Observation of presupposition in topic initiation
        5.5.2 Observation of presupposition in information progression
    5.6 Summary
Chapter Ⅵ Concluding Remarks
    6.1 Summary of the present study
    6.2 Major Findings
    6.3 Conclusions
    6.4 Implications
    6.5 Limitations of the present study
    6.6 Suggestions for further study
References
Acknowledgements
Appendix


【参考文献】：
期刊论文
[1]律师语言策略在庭审中所传递的意向含意[J]. 张丹,邱天河.  郑州航空工业管理学院学报(社会科学版). 2007(03)
[2]法庭会话中的语言预设策略分析[J]. 张玥.  广东外语外贸大学学报. 2007(02)
[3]法庭言语行为与言语策略[J]. 赵军峰.  广东外语外贸大学学报. 2007(02)
[4]法律语篇树状信息结构研究[J]. 杜金榜.  现代外语. 2007(01)
[5]语用预设及其交际功能[J]. 郑国平.  安徽水利水电职业技术学院学报. 2006(03)
[6]如何避免语用预设失误[J]. 罗国莹.  修辞学习. 2006(05)
[7]庭审会话中的言语策略和权力控制——律师-证人庭审会话分析[J]. 李滨,杨跃.  榆林学院学报. 2006(01)
[8]语用预设的语篇功能体现[J]. 倪海燕,唐德根.  求索. 2005(11)
[9]试论预设策略在法庭交叉询问中的运用[J]. 蓝小燕.  涪陵师范学院学报. 2005(05)
[10]目的原则与语篇连贯分析[J]. 廖美珍.  外语教学与研究. 2005(05)

硕士论文
[1]从预设角度看警察讯问信息传递中问题类型和句子结构的选择[D]. 张文帅.广东外语外贸大学 2005



本文编号：3090726