英美反恐羁押模式比较及启示

发布时间：2018-05-28 16:27

  本文选题：反恐 + 羁押模式　； 参考：《中国人民公安大学学报(社会科学版)》2014年04期

【摘要】：羁押是侦查机关采取的对嫌疑人人身权利约束最严重的手段,同时由于其具有的人身控制性也成为各国面对严重犯罪采用率较高的强制措施之一。恐怖主义犯罪在严重性、急迫性、危害性等方面与普通犯罪不可同日而语。各国为了有效反恐纷纷创设和改良羁押模式,羁押措施的程序控制成为亟需研究和解决的课题。美国从"法律真空"到有限审查、英国的无限羁押和控制令制度是反恐背景下羁押制度改革的典型。两种模式在法律基础、程序的刚性程度、对待基本人权的态度等方面体现出一定的差异性,同时在普遍强调公民身份、推崇行政权力等方面表现出一致性。我国未来的反恐羁押制度必须汲取两国经验,坚持人权保障的底线标准。
[Abstract]:Custody is the most serious means to restrain the personal rights of suspects, and it has become one of the compulsory measures in the face of serious crimes. The crime of terrorism can not be compared with ordinary crime in terms of seriousness, urgency and harmfulness. In order to effectively counter-terrorism, many countries have created and improved the detention mode, and the procedural control of detention measures has become a subject that needs to be studied and solved. From "legal vacuum" to "limited review" in the United States, the unlimited detention and control order system in Britain is a typical reform of detention system in the context of anti-terrorism. The two models show some differences in legal basis, degree of rigidity of procedure, attitude towards basic human rights and so on. At the same time, the two models show consistency in the aspects of emphasizing citizenship, advocating administrative power and so on. China's future anti-terrorism detention system must draw on the experience of the two countries, adhere to the bottom line standards of human rights protection.
【作者单位】： 西南政法大学;
【基金】：重庆市社科规划培育项目“恐怖主义犯罪立体化对策研究”(2013PYFX13) 重庆高校创新团队建设计划资助项目(KJTD201301)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D918
，

本文编号：1947404