青少年犯罪影响因素及预防体系的研究

发布时间：2018-05-30 12:33

本文选题：青少年犯罪 + 危险因素　；参考：《中南大学》2010年硕士论文

【摘要】： 目的探讨男性青少年犯罪的主要影响因素,为开展青少年犯罪的预防提供理论依据和应对策略。方法采用病例对照研究方法,以湖南省少管所137例男性少年犯为病例组,以同一地区的145例在校男性青少年为对照组,采用一般情况问卷及青少年生活事件量表、应付方式量表、家庭环境量表中文版、社会支持量表、人格诊断问卷进行问卷调查,采用非参数检验、两独立样本t检验和逐步判别分析对资料进行单因素及多因素分析,筛选影响青少年犯罪的主要危险因素。结果 1.单因素分析结果表明：犯罪青少年在负性生活事件总量及部分因子(人际关系、健康适应、其它负性事件)、不成熟应付方式(自责、幻想、退避)、合理化的应付方式、家庭的矛盾性、各型人格缺陷(偏执型、分裂性、分裂型、癔病型、自恋型、边缘型、反社会型、回避型、依赖型、强迫型、被动攻击型、抑郁型)上得分及家庭破裂的比例均高于对照组,而在受教育程度、负性生活事件中学习压力因子、成熟的应付方式(解决问题、求助)、家庭环境的部分因子(亲密性、文化性、组织性)、社会支持(主观支持、客观支持、对支持的利用度)上得分均低于对照组,两组间差异有统计学意义(p0.05)。 2.多因素分析结果表明：以有无犯罪为分类变量,进行逐步判别分析,最终发现人际关系及健康适应方面的负性生活事件、自责的应付方式、家庭环境的矛盾性、客观支持、主观支持、对支持的利用度、反社会人格、强迫人格、被动攻击人格最终进入判别方程式,所得的判别方程式总正确率为92.2%。结论 1.犯罪青少年家庭内部的矛盾性较高。 2.犯罪青少年遭遇更多的负性生活事件,遭遇不良应激时更易采取不成熟应付方式去处理问题,可寻获的有效社会支持网络薄弱。 3.人际关系及健康适应方面的负性生活事件,自责型的应付方式,家庭环境的矛盾冲突及社会支持系统薄弱,反社会、强迫、被动攻击型的人格缺陷,是识别青少年犯罪的主要危险因素。
[Abstract]:Objective to explore the main influencing factors of male juvenile delinquency and to provide theoretical basis and countermeasures for the prevention of juvenile delinquency. Methods A case-control study was conducted with 137 male juvenile delinquents in Hunan Provincial Juvenile Penitentiary Institute as the case group and 145 male adolescents in the same area as the control group. The general situation questionnaire and the Youth Life event scale were used. Coping style scale, Chinese version of Family Environment scale, Social support scale, Personality Diagnostic questionnaire, non-parametric test, two independent samples t test and stepwise discriminant analysis were used to analyze the data. Screening the main risk factors affecting juvenile delinquency. Result 1. The results of univariate analysis showed that the total number of negative life events and some factors (interpersonal relationships, health adaptation, other negative events, immature coping styles (self-reproach, fantasy, retreat, rationalization of coping style) of juvenile delinquents), Family contradictions, personality defects (paranoid, split, hysteria, narcissistic, marginal, antisocial, evasive, dependent, compulsive, passive, aggressive), The scores of depression type and the proportion of family breakup were higher than those of the control group, while the factors of education, negative life events, learning stress, mature coping style (problem solving, help seeking help, family environment) were higher than those of the control group. The scores of cultural, organizational and social support (subjective support, objective support, utilization of support) were lower than those of the control group, and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (p 0.05). 2. The results of multivariate analysis showed that: using crime or not as the classification variable, a stepwise discriminant analysis was carried out, and the negative life events in interpersonal relationships and health adaptation, the coping style of self-accusation, the contradiction of family environment, and objective support were finally found. Subjective support, utilization of support, antisocial personality, forced personality, passive attack personality finally enter the discriminant equation, the total correct rate of the discriminant equation is 92.22. Conclusion 1. The contradiction within the family of juvenile delinquents is relatively high. 2. Juvenile delinquents encounter more negative life events and are more likely to adopt immature coping styles to deal with problems when they encounter adverse stress. The effective social support network can be found to be weak. 3. Negative life events in interpersonal relationships and health adaptation, self-blame coping styles, contradictions and conflicts in the family environment and weak social support systems, antisocial, compulsive and passive personality defects, It is the main risk factor to identify juvenile delinquency.
【学位授予单位】：中南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2010
【分类号】：C913.5

【参考文献】