司法鉴定机构仪器设备基本配置标准的探讨
发布时间：2019-03-15 11:53
【摘要】：2005年10月1日《全国人大常委会关于司法鉴定管理的决定》(下称《决定》)实施以来,司法鉴定机构的准入条件逐步明确、细化,2006年9月1日司法部下发了《司法鉴定机构仪器设备基本配置标准(暂行)》(下称《暂行标准》),为司法行政机关开展司法鉴定机构审核登记及检查、评估提供了具体标准,也为司法鉴定机构的发展和完善指明了方向。但实行《暂行标准》一年多来,我们可以感到其与司法鉴定体制改革最大限度地利用社会资源的初衷有差距,也与司法鉴定实践存在着一定差距,为此笔者拟对完善《暂行标准》进行探讨。
[Abstract]:Since the implementation of the "decision of the standing Committee of the National people's Congress on the Administration of Judicial expertise" (hereinafter referred to as the "decision") on October 1, 2005, the conditions for admission of judicial appraisal institutions have been gradually clarified and refined. On September 1, 2006, the Ministry of Justice issued the basic Standard for the allocation of Instruments and equipment in Forensic Appraisal institutions (temporary) (hereinafter referred to as the Provisional Standard) to conduct examination, registration and inspection of judicial authentication institutions for the judicial administrative organs. The evaluation provides specific criteria and points out the direction for the development and perfection of forensic institutions. However, in the past more than a year since the implementation of the Provisional Standard, we can feel that there is a gap between it and the original intention of making the maximum use of social resources in the reform of the judicial expertise system, and there is also a certain gap between it and the practice of judicial expertise. Therefore, the author intends to perfect the Provisional Standard.
【作者单位】： 广东省司法厅;司法部司法鉴定科学技术研究所;
【分类号】：D918.9
[Abstract]:Since the implementation of the "decision of the standing Committee of the National people's Congress on the Administration of Judicial expertise" (hereinafter referred to as the "decision") on October 1, 2005, the conditions for admission of judicial appraisal institutions have been gradually clarified and refined. On September 1, 2006, the Ministry of Justice issued the basic Standard for the allocation of Instruments and equipment in Forensic Appraisal institutions (temporary) (hereinafter referred to as the Provisional Standard) to conduct examination, registration and inspection of judicial authentication institutions for the judicial administrative organs. The evaluation provides specific criteria and points out the direction for the development and perfection of forensic institutions. However, in the past more than a year since the implementation of the Provisional Standard, we can feel that there is a gap between it and the original intention of making the maximum use of social resources in the reform of the judicial expertise system, and there is also a certain gap between it and the practice of judicial expertise. Therefore, the author intends to perfect the Provisional Standard.
【作者单位】： 广东省司法厅;司法部司法鉴定科学技术研究所;
【分类号】：D918.9
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 ;东南西北[J];中国劳动;1983年15期
2 陈厚珩;;世界治癌新进展[J];世界知识;1983年18期
3 ;我国新兴环保工业[J];w，
本文编号：2440599
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/fanzuizhian/2440599.html
