当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 司法论文 >

论标准化审判

发布时间:2018-01-06 14:23

  本文关键词:论标准化审判 出处:《华南理工大学》2013年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文


  更多相关文章: 标准化 标准化审判 法官自由裁量权


【摘要】:目前的审判方式受我国传统文化中的亲情人情因素影响太重,在实行市场经济的今天仍然十分严重,司法最怕的就是“关系”之风,只有改变法律的运作机制和在制度上限止法官过度的滥用权力,才能阻止和消灭这股不正之风。既要有效限制法官个人自由裁量权的过度滥用,又不能过度的干涉将法官彻底束缚而不能秉持公平、正义的理念办案。推行“标准化办案”弥补了法律的滞后性同时统一了裁判尺度,为法官断案提供了“标准化处方”。文中将“标准化办案”界定为法院系统视野下的审判方式,即标准化审判。 因此,本文首先在司法领域,法院系统视野下,运用概念法学的方法,从标准化的概念及特征出发,,及国外法院标准化管理的运行趋势的把握,界定了标准化审判的概念及特征;其次,从法学界理论研究者与司法实务工作者对于标准化审判的不同观点,运用比较分析的方法,分析这两类观点,接着又从实践层面分析已推行标准化审判的法院的做法与收获,更进一步体现出推行标准化审判的必要性和可行性,最后概括提出了在推行标准化审判时法院应该注意的几点问题。本文的创新之处在于,对标准化审判的必要性和可行性进行了详细论证。通过比较分析的方法,提出标准化审判的法理兼容性与司法权的博弈,通过中基层法院与实践中法院已有的“标准化办案”来论证标准化审判的必要性和可行性。进一步推动国内司法改革新局面,真正实现司法公平、公正、效率的司法目标。
[Abstract]:The current trial is affected by the affection of human factors in the traditional culture of our country is too heavy, in a market economy today is still very serious, is "relationship" justice most afraid of the wind, only to change the operation mechanism of law and in the system to judge the excessive abuse of power, to prevent and eliminate the unwholesome tendencies. Excessive abuse should effectively restrain the judge's discretion, but not excessive interference will not completely bound judges uphold fairness and justice, the implementation of the "standard of handling cases." make up the lag of law unified the referee scale at the same time, provides a "standard prescription" for the judge. The "standard case" is defined as the court system from the perspective of trial mode, namely the standardization of the trial.
Therefore, this paper firstly in the field of justice, the court system perspective, using the method of the concept of law, starting from the concept and characteristics of the standardized operation, and the trend of foreign court standardization management to grasp the concept and characteristics of the standard of justice; secondly, different from the point of view of theoretical research and judicial practice workers law for the standardization of the trial, using comparative analysis method, analysis of these two kinds of views, the practice of the court and then harvested from the practical level analysis has been carried out standardization trial, further reflects the necessity and feasibility of the implementation of standardized trial, finally some problems in the implementation of the trial court should be standardized note the summary is proposed. The innovation of this paper is the necessity and feasibility of standardization trial are studied in detail. Through comparative analysis, put forward the legal standard of judgment The game between compatibility and judicial power demonstrates the necessity and feasibility of standardized trial through the existing standardized cases in basic courts and in practice. It further promotes the new phase of domestic judicial reform and truly achieves the judicial goal of judicial fairness, fairness and efficiency.

【学位授予单位】:华南理工大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2013
【分类号】:D926.2

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前2条

1 张榕;;事实认定中的法官自由裁量权[J];法律科学(西北政法大学学报);2009年04期

2 耿建新;肖振东;;ISO14000认证出口效应研究——基于中国资本市场的经验证据[J];中国软科学;2006年01期



本文编号:1388247

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/gongjianfalunwen/1388247.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户6e8e6***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com