论刑事诉讼中检法关系

发布时间：2018-01-07 23:26

本文关键词：论刑事诉讼中检法关系　出处：《吉林大学》2013年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：检察院与法院在我国均奉行单位独立（或者叫“官厅独立”）。在刑事诉讼领域，检察院与法院之间的关系可以说直接决定着我国刑事法律领域的执法水平，双方之间的运行水平直接反应出的是我国司法、立法的效果。从这个角度讲，检法之间的关系无论如何强调也不过分。事实上，我国刑事程序立法的大多数条文也是或者直接或者间接的在规制检法之间的司法实践。刑事诉讼中检法之间的关系实际上是一对相互促进的矛盾关系。检法双方有着共同的价值观念、共同的行政化倾向。使得双方首先是在面对共同必然遇到的问题面前，心有戚戚。同样的需要经过公务员考试和国家统一司法考试才能任职的成员群体，由于双方成员都在参照公务员管理一类，且在事实上也更多的被外界以检察机关、审判机关称谓（事实上，检法两院要想行使必要的司法权都需要经过内部的层层审批。这种审批制度与行政机关行使行政权力本质上并无二致。）检察院和法院在价值观上相比较律师和法学界而言要有更多共同点。这也构成双方互相理解的基础。在案件中心主义的审查方式下和对于实体正义的过分追求的背景下，检法两院显然在努力的维持互相之间的关系的和谐发展。检法之间的关系是在互相制约中取得了互相配合的平衡。检察院是法律监督机关，落实到本文讨论的范围之内主要体现在对法院庭审程序和裁判结论的监督。手段主要是纠正违法建议书和提出抗诉。在现行制度下检察机关对于运用提起抗诉权非常克制。考虑法官的裁判是刑事诉讼程序的结论，以及检察院绩效考核体系实际上是以法官的判决作为检验的标杆，那么检察官与法官这对关系便呈现出了互相制约的态势。而因为双方都会非常谨慎的运用各自的制约手段，所以双方反而会因为制约关系而实现更加紧密的配合态势。当然从诉讼结构看，，这种情况并不合理。笔者以为解决上述问题需要依靠本土化资源寻找办法，而不是完全依靠不加限制的法律移植。笔者通过自己的研究发现检法之间的关系的问题核心在于检法之间互相监督力度不足。由于检法之间互相监督不足导致庭审的形式化、被告人入罪容易脱罪难、监督权力行使不充分。这直接导致了被告人一方在刑事诉讼过程中的一些实体机会被牺牲，但是这种互动确实是使得检法之间的关系更加的“互相配合”或者称作更加的和谐。也许这正应了以为学人所言“刑事诉讼程序本身即带有对于被告人的惩罚性，无论被告人是否在刑事诉讼程序中得到惩罚”。当然从某个角度来看，我国的刑事诉讼程序由于检法之间的“分工负责、互相配合”机制，显然使得被告人在刑事诉讼中更容易受到惩罚。解决这一问题的思路笔者以为一是限制检法之间针对具体案件的庭下沟通，二是寻找新的标准检验检法的工作绩效，三是确立权力行使者对法律结果的责任制。
[Abstract]:In the field of criminal procedure , the relationship between the Public Prosecutor ' s Office and the Court can directly determine the level of law enforcement in China ' s criminal law field . The relationship between the two parties directly reflects the judicial and legislative effect of our country . In fact , most of the provisions of the legislation of criminal procedure in our country are either directly or indirectly judicial practice between regulation and inspection . The relationship between the law and the law in criminal procedure is actually a pair of contradictory relations . The two sides have common values and common administrative tendency . The Public Prosecutor ' s Office and the Court are more common in values than lawyers and law circles . This also constitutes the basis for mutual understanding between the two parties . In the context of a case - centered review and an excessive pursuit of entity justice , the two chambers of the law are clearly trying to maintain a harmonious development of the relationship between each other . The relationship between the law and the law is the balance of mutual cooperation among the mutual restriction . The procuratorial organ is the legal supervision organ , which is embodied in the scope of the discussion in this paper . The means are mainly to correct the illegal proposal and to lodge a protest . In the present system , the procuratorial organ is very restrained by the application of the right of prosecution . On the other hand , the author thinks that the criminal procedure in our country is more likely to be punished in criminal proceedings because of the lack of mutual supervision between the inspection methods , which directly leads to the punishment of the defendant in criminal proceedings .

【学位授予单位】：吉林大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：D925.2;D926

【参考文献】