民间规则的司法识别:程序、内容与机制

发布时间：2018-01-20 17:12

本文关键词： 民间规则司法识别识别程序识别标准案例指导制度　出处：《山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2012年05期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：当下我国的司法审判中经常出现这样的问题:法官在审理复杂疑难的案件时,面对国家法的空白、漏洞、不足时,如何对民间规则进行司法识别与适用,并作出适当的审判。一起婚姻家庭案件的司法审判过程表明,我国司法审判的法源是国家法,民间规则的司法适用只是为了填补国家法的漏洞,应当严格适用条件,防止滥用,因此,民间规则的司法适用必须进行识别程序,这个识别程序包括民间规则的主张、举证以及查明三个环节,其中当事人与法官承担着不同的责任:当事人主张存在某项民间规则并予以举证;法官识别与适用该项民间规则。法官对民间规则的识别内容包括规范识别与效力识别两个方面。在相关的制度设计上,我国应当建立民间规则的司法识别机制,主要包括设立法官识别民间规则的标准、以民间规则的汇编建立案例指导制度等。
[Abstract]:In the current judicial trial in our country, there are often such problems: how to identify and apply the folk rules in the face of the gaps, loopholes and deficiencies of the national law when judges are trying complicated and difficult cases. The judicial process of a marriage and family case shows that the legal source of judicial trial in our country is the national law, and the judicial application of the folk rules is only to fill the loopholes of the national law. Conditions should be strictly applied to prevent abuse, therefore, the judicial application of folk rules must carry out identification procedure, which includes the claim of folk rules, proof and identification of three links. Among them, the parties and the judges bear different responsibilities: the parties advocate the existence of certain folk rules and give evidence; Judge identification and application of the folk rules. Judges of folk rules recognition content includes normative identification and effectiveness identification. In the relevant system design, our country should establish the judicial recognition mechanism of folk rules. It mainly includes setting up the standard of judge's identifying folk rules, setting up case guidance system by compiling folk rules and so on.
【作者单位】：上海大学ADR与仲裁研究院;上海大学法学院;
【基金】：2011年上海市教委科研创新重点项目“中国特色社区调解制度若干问题研究”(项目批准号11ZS97)的阶段性研究成果
【分类号】：D926
【正文快照】： 我国当下正处于矛盾纠纷频发的社会转型①时期,尽管2010年我国已经形成了社会主义法律体系②,但反映多变社会生活的司法审判,仍然会出现法律滞后于社会纠纷的现象,而承担司法审判重任的一线法官又必须“案结事了”,因此,承载了我国几千年传统文化的民间规则成为了法官解决司

【参考文献】