民意与司法的关系及协调

发布时间：2018-01-21 18:29

本文关键词： 民意司法公正理性参与有限介入　出处：《南京师范大学》2012年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：自中国进入互联网时代以来,在几乎每一起重大的刑事案件背后,都能看到汹涌的民意表达。民意的价值不仅仅体现在监督上,也可以通过多种方式广泛的影响社会生活及社会发展。民意作为社会民众所特有的意见、意愿、看法,是公民表达自由的集中体现,然后,由于民意自身所具有的种种不足,民意往往又会对司法产生不利的影响,因而,民意与司法的关系是极为复杂,有人说,民意在推动司法走向正义,也有人说,民意干预了司法的独立。司法最重要的品格是独立性,并不应被民意随意左右。而在一个成熟的法治社会,民意也应有充分的表达空间,现下中国司法正处于改革和转型时期,民意的理性参与和监督,是司法赢得民众信任、从而真正走向独立的途径之一。因而,司法应以审慎的态度吸纳理性、有序、合法的民意,通过适当的介入机制,如通过建立“法庭之友”制度、建立民意的评价与反馈制度等,最终实现两者的和谐统一。
[Abstract]:Since China entered the Internet era, in almost every major criminal case, you can see the surging expression of public opinion. The value of public opinion is not only reflected in supervision. Public opinion, as the unique opinion, will, view of the public, is the concentrated embodiment of the freedom of expression of citizens, then. Due to the shortcomings of public opinion itself, public opinion will often have a negative impact on the judiciary. Therefore, the relationship between public opinion and the judiciary is extremely complex. Some people say that public opinion is promoting justice in the judiciary, others say. Public opinion interferes with the independence of the judiciary. The most important character of the judiciary is independence, which should not be controlled by public opinion at will. In a mature society governed by the rule of law, public opinion should also have adequate expression space. At present, the Chinese judiciary is in the period of reform and transformation. The rational participation and supervision of public opinion is one of the ways for the judiciary to win the trust of the people and to move towards independence. Therefore, the judiciary should absorb the rational, orderly and legitimate public opinion in a prudent manner. Through appropriate intervention mechanism, such as the establishment of amicus curiae system, the establishment of public opinion evaluation and feedback system, the final realization of the two harmonious unity.
【学位授予单位】：南京师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D926

【参考文献】