论刑事审判中的自由裁量权

发布时间：2018-01-22 16:59

本文关键词： 刑事审判自由裁量权事实认定适用法律　出处：《黑龙江大学》2011年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：受多种因素的影响,法官在刑事审判中拥有自由裁量权,刑事自由裁量权是指法官在审理案件的过程中,根据公平正义的原则、法律提供的原则,就案件基本事实、适用法律、裁判结果自由作出选择的权力。对这样一种权力如果不加控制的行使,将会导致多种恶劣的结果,因此,如何正确行使刑事自由裁量权、对滥用刑事自由裁量权的行为加以控制就成为值得研究的问题。对刑事审判自由裁量权的研究应当遵循从理论到实践的基本逻辑,首先回答自由裁量权存在的基础及实际意义,然后就如何正确行使自由裁量权进行分析,接着介绍自由裁量权滥用的表现及危害,并就自由裁量权滥用的控制提出可能的解决方案,按照这样的逻辑本文主要包括以下四个部分: 第一部分,基础理论的介绍部分,界定了自由裁量权和刑事审判中自由裁量权的概念,为全文的研究作相应的理论铺垫,将刑事审判的自由裁量权限定为法官在刑事审判中的自由裁量权,而不研究检察官、警察在刑事案件中的自由裁量权。第二部分,研究了刑事审判自由裁量权存在的基础及其意义。由于成文法的局限性、法律解释的不确定性和我国《刑法》的授权,使得刑事自由裁量权的存在具有必要性和合理性。刑事审判自由裁量权的存在有利于克服成文法的局限、有利于增加司法的灵活性、有利于法官平衡各种利益而实现司法公正、有利于法官职业化的形成。第三部分,研究了刑事审判自由裁量权的正确行使。刑事自由裁量权的行使应当遵循合法性、合目的性和合理性原则,在证据运用、案件事实、适用法律三个方面正确行使自由裁量权,对于影响刑事自由裁量权行使的外部因素也应有所认识,包括网络舆情的影响、司法制度行政化以及行政和人大对于司法的干预。第四部分,研究了刑事审判中自由裁量权的滥用及其控制。滥用表现在刑事自由裁量权的动机错误、刑罚显示公平以及拖延审判,其危害了刑事各方主体的利益,损害了司法权威,破坏了法律面前人人平等的原则,对其应从认定事实和适用法律两个角度加以控制。
[Abstract]:Influenced by many factors, the judge has the discretion in the criminal trial. The criminal discretion is the principle provided by the law according to the principle of fairness and justice in the course of hearing the case. With regard to the basic facts of the case, the application of the law and the right to choose freely the outcome of the judgment. If such a power is not exercised without control, it will lead to a variety of adverse results, therefore. How to correctly exercise the criminal discretion. It is worth studying to control the abuse of criminal discretion. The research on the discretion of criminal trial should follow the basic logic from theory to practice. First answer the basis and practical significance of the existence of discretion, then analyze how to exercise discretion correctly, and then introduce the performance and harm of discretion abuse. And put forward the possible solution to the control of discretion abuse, according to this logic, this paper mainly includes the following four parts: The first part, the introduction of the basic theory, defines the concept of discretion and discretion in criminal trial, and makes a theoretical foundation for the study of the full text. The discretion of the criminal trial is limited to the discretion of the judge in the criminal trial, without studying the discretion of the prosecutor and the police in the criminal case. The second part studies the foundation and significance of the discretion of criminal trial. Because of the limitation of statutory law, the uncertainty of legal interpretation and the authorization of criminal law in our country. The existence of criminal discretion is necessary and reasonable. The existence of criminal trial discretion is conducive to overcome the limitations of statutory law and increase the flexibility of the judiciary. It is beneficial for the judge to balance all kinds of interests and to realize the judicial justice and the formation of the judge professionalization. The third part studies the correct exercise of the discretion of criminal trial. The exercise of the discretion of criminal justice should follow the principles of legality, purpose and rationality, in the use of evidence, the facts of the case. Three aspects of the application of the law of the correct exercise of discretion, the exercise of the criminal discretion of the external factors should also be recognized, including the impact of network public opinion. The administration of the judicial system and the interference of the administration and the people's Congress in the administration of justice. In the 4th part, the author studies the abuse and control of the discretion in the criminal trial. The abuse is manifested in the error of the motive of the criminal discretion, the fairness of the penalty and the delay of the trial. It endangers the interests of all parties to the crime, damages the judicial authority, and undermines the principle of equality before the law. It should be controlled from the two angles of ascertaining the facts and applying the law.
【学位授予单位】：黑龙江大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D924.1;D926.2

【参考文献】