东莞市S法院绩效评估模式构建研究

发布时间：2018-01-22 18:50

本文关键词： 法院管理绩效评估模式　出处：《兰州大学》2011年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：近年来,司法在国家经济社会发展进程中的地位和作用日益突出,与此同时,人民群众日益增长的司法需求与人民法院司法功能相对滞后的矛盾亦愈发凸显出来。在转型过渡时期我国司法环境下,人民法院只有通过加强审判管理,不断提高审判质量与效率,才能有效应对司法审判工作所面临的形式和挑战.2005年10月,最高人民法院发布了《人民法院第二个五年改革纲要》,明确提出：“建立科学,统一的审判质量与效率评估体系。在确保法官依法独立判案的前提下,确立科学的评估标准,完善评估机制。”可见,作为审判管理基础和依据的审判质量与效率评估体系,无疑是深入推进审判管理改革的重点领域之一.审判管理是基于对审判活动规律的认识和把握,而对审判行为与过程实施调控,评价与引导的一种司法工作机制。加强审判管理,必须建立在对审判工作正确的评估和分析的基础之上；而建立审判质量与效率评估体系,则为这种评估和分析提供了科学依据。本文以东莞市S法院自成立两年来实施的绩效评估体系作为研究对象,采用实例分析法,结合公共管理绩效评估理论,对该法院的绩效评估体系的运用以及存在问题进行了详细分析,提出了相应的研究结论和解决办法,即东莞市S法院设立考核领导小组办公室,完善评估流程,在业绩指标及目标值的设置时要充分考虑法院所面对的现实,并且必须增加业绩指标的分值(权重),在进行绩效评估时,‘考虑让更多的外部评估主体能够直接对法院工作进行评议,从而构建具有科学性和有效性的法院绩效评估体系。本文的研究不但能帮助东莞市S法院解决其在绩效评估过程中遇到的现实问题,而且能对其他法院构建绩效评估体系提供重要的启示和借鉴作用。
[Abstract]:In recent years, the status and role of justice in the national economic and social development process is increasingly prominent, at the same time. The contradiction between the increasing judicial demand of the people and the relative lag of the judicial function of the people's court is also increasingly prominent. In the transitional period of our country, the people's court can only strengthen the trial management. Only by constantly improving the quality and efficiency of trials can we effectively cope with the forms and challenges facing the judicial work. On October 2005, the Supreme people's Court issued the second Five-Year Reform outline of the people's Court. Clearly put forward: "establish a scientific, unified evaluation system of trial quality and efficiency. Under the premise of ensuring the judge to judge an independent case according to law, establish the scientific evaluation standard and perfect the evaluation mechanism." As the basis and basis of trial management, the evaluation system of trial quality and efficiency is undoubtedly one of the key areas to promote the reform of trial management. Trial management is based on the understanding and grasp of the law of trial activities. A judicial work mechanism which regulates, evaluates and guides the trial behavior and process, and strengthens the trial management, must be based on the correct evaluation and analysis of the trial work. The establishment of trial quality and efficiency evaluation system provides a scientific basis for this evaluation and analysis. This paper takes the performance evaluation system implemented by the S Court of Dongguan City since its establishment for two years as the research object, adopts the case analysis method, and combines with the theory of public management performance evaluation. The application and problems of the performance evaluation system of the court are analyzed in detail, and the corresponding research conclusions and solutions are put forward, that is, Dongguan S Court set up the Office of the Evaluation leading Group to perfect the evaluation process. When setting performance indicators and target values, we should take full account of the reality faced by the court, and must increase the score of performance indicators (weights, in the performance evaluation. Consider allowing more external evaluators to comment directly on the work of the court, so as to build a scientific and effective court performance evaluation system. The research in this paper can not only help Dongguan S court solve the practical problems in the process of performance evaluation, but also provide important inspiration and reference for other courts to build performance evaluation system.
【学位授予单位】：兰州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D926.2

【相似文献】