论经验隶属性和法治化程度对司法裁判的影响——基于认知科学角度的实证分析

发布时间：2018-01-26 22:06

  本文关键词： 经验隶属性 法治化程度 司法裁判 认知科学 关系人　出处：《社会科学研究》2017年03期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：在不同的法律制度、机制和文化环境下,不同性质的先前经验可能会以不同的方式作用于司法裁判。具备体制内和体制外工作经验的法官具备不同的知识优势,进而通过不同的方式促进司法裁判。其作用机制因法官知识结构的差异而不同。在法治化程度较高的地区,体制外工作经验对司法裁判的促进作用更强,同时借助动用体制内的社会关系能提升具备体制外经验法官的司法裁判能力。理应化解甚至打破“行政”和“司法”并存甚至相互竞争的格局,培育法治文化和法律意识。启发立志于从事法官职业或正进行法官职业的人员理性的积累有助于未来司法裁判公正性的经验。
[Abstract]:In different legal systems, mechanisms and cultural settings, prior experience of a different nature may play a different role in the administration of justice. Judges with working experience both within and outside the system have different intellectual advantages. Then through different ways to promote the administration of justice. Its mechanism is different because of the different knowledge structure of judges. In areas with higher degree of rule of law, the work experience outside the system has a stronger role to promote the judicial decision. At the same time, with the help of the social relations within the system, we can enhance the judicial judgment ability of judges with experience outside the system. We should resolve or even break the pattern of "administration" and "judicature" coexist and even compete with each other. To cultivate the culture of rule of law and the consciousness of law, to inspire the rational accumulation of personnel who are determined to engage in or are engaged in the profession of judges will be helpful to the future experience of justice in the administration of justice.
【正文快照】： 社 会 科 学 研 究 2017. 3. 论经验隶属性和法治化程度对司法裁判的影响 ——— 基于认知科学角度的实证分析 蔡艺生 〔 摘要 〕 在不同的法律制度 、 机制和文化环境下，不同性质的先前经验可能会以不同的 方式作用于司法裁判 。 具备体制内和体制外工作经，

本文编号：1466720