司法公信力视域下法官诚信调解机制研究

发布时间：2018-01-26 21:35

本文关键词： 司法公信力法官强制调解法官诚信调解法官诚信调解机制　出处：《上海大学》2014年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：作为法治社会的一个重要标志，司法公信力的程度越高,司法的职能和作用越能很好地实现。党的十八大报告中出现了许多关于司法、法治的关键词眼，可谓通篇都充满了浓厚的法治元素，并且第一次提到了加强司法公信建设。但现实是司法效率的低下、司法人员的行为失范以及个案审理的不公，使得人们对司法充满了失望与不满。法律丧失了本该有的权威，人们遇到纠纷的时候不愿再寻求司法的裁决，这种后果将不堪设想。作为捍卫社会正义最后关卡的司法机关与法官，更要具有较高的公信力。可见，维护司法权威，提高司法公信力，树立公众的法律信仰是一项刻不容缓的重要任务。目前我国正处于社会转型的重要时期，调解作为我国民事诉讼中一项重要制度，对于及时有效化解矛盾纠纷，节约司法资源，，促进司法和谐发挥着积极作用。然而，在“调解优先、调判结合”的政策引导下，法院调解制度正经历着一场复兴运动，“以判压调”“以骗诱调”“久调不决”等不当调解行为乱相环生，催生法官强制调解问题的出现。当越来越多的调解案件进入强制执行程序后，调解的案件同样面临了“执行难”问题，这对于司法公信力的提升是十分不利的。面对这一问题，纠正法官强制调解的不当调解行为，督促法官诚信调解时建设司法公信力的必由之路。由于现有制度对法官调解行为的监督约束并不清晰完善，因此，构建有效的法官诚信调解机制对于司法公信力的提升具有不可忽视的现实意义。本论文包括引言、正文以及结语，正文部分包括四章内容。第一章主要包括司法公信力的基础问题和法院调解制度两部分内容。在对司法公信力的概念及现状进行阐述后，探讨了法院调解对司法公信力的积极作用，并指出目前我国法院调解制度中存在法官强制调解的问题，正危害着司法公信力的建设，值得重视和研究。第二章中笔者对法官强制调解问题进行了全方面深刻的剖析与探讨。首先是用了比较分析的方法对法官强制调解的概念进行界定。接着列举了法官强制调解在现实中的几种表现形式，更加形象地对法官强制调解现象进行诠释，从中发现了其隐蔽性极强的特征。进而还从法官的心理角度分析其强制调解的行为原因，即在大调解政策的引导下产生的省事功利心理。最后讨论了现有的针对法官强制调解的约束机制存在一定缺陷，可以说约束效果软弱无力。第三章基于前两章的研究，将诚信作为联接司法公信力与法官调解行为的关键点，提出法官诚信调解的创新概念，在诚信理论的研究成果上对其进行充分阐释，对法官诚信调解的内涵、基本要求及评价标准进行了理论探索。最后进一步分析了法官诚信调解与司法公信力的关系，提出法官诚信调解有利于司法公信力提升的观点。第四章是本文创作的重点内容，也是创新研究，即依据法官调解行为的特质设计构建最优的法官诚信调解机制。由于法官强制调解具有极强的隐蔽性，这与法官的心理因素有密不可分的关系，因此本文要建立的法官诚信调解机制是以激励手段为主的诚信机制。笔者运用经济学中的委托代理理论详细剖析法官调解中的行为选择过程，并从管理制度、信用体系、司法环境、法律保障四个方面，提出法官诚信调解机制的构建路径，引导法官做出与当事人利益一致的行为选择，即诚信调解。构建法官诚信调解机制不仅可以规范法官调解行为、培养法官诚信意识、营造司法公信环境，而且对于提升司法公信力具有实践意义。
[Abstract]:As an important symbol of the rule of law, the higher the degree of credibility of the judiciary, the judicial function can well realize the. Eighteen big reports of the party appeared many about justice, the rule of law is full of keywords eyes are full of strong legal elements, and the first mention of the strengthening of judicial public trust construction. But the reality is that the low judicial efficiency, judicial misconduct and case of injustice, makes people full of disappointment and dissatisfaction of judicial law. The loss of some of the authority, when people encounter disputes to seek judicial ruling, the consequences will be unbearable to contemplate. As the judicial organ and judge to defend the last level of social justice, but also to have a high credibility. Therefore, safeguard judicial authority, improve judicial credibility, establish the legal faith of the public is an urgent important task.
At present, China is in an important period of social transformation, China's civil litigation mediation as an important system, timely and effective to resolve disputes, save the judicial resources and judicial harmony plays a positive role in promoting. However, "mediation priority, combined with" the transfersub policy under the guidance of the court mediation system is experiencing a Renaissance, "to the press" "seduced" long tune "decision" improper mediation behavior chaos Huansheng stimulate the judge forced mediation, the problem. When more and more mediation cases after entering the enforcement procedure, mediation cases also faced the problem of "difficult to execute", this it is very unfavorable for enhancing the credibility of the judiciary. Facing this problem, improper behavior correct judge mandatory mediation mediation, the judge mediation construction good faith the only way which must be passed to the judicial credibility. Because the current system of law The supervision and restraint of official mediation is not clear and perfect. Therefore, building effective judge mediation mechanism is of great significance for enhancing the credibility of judiciary.
This paper includes the introduction, the main body and the conclusion, and the body part includes four chapters.
The first chapter mainly includes the basic problems of the judicial credibility and the court mediation system two parts elaborated the concept and present situation of the credibility of the judiciary, discusses the positive role of court mediation of judicial credibility, and it is pointed out that the court mediation system of our country exists in the law officer compulsory mediation problem is endangering the construction of judicial credibility that worthy of attention and study.
In the second chapter, the author probes into the profound analysis of all aspects of the problem. The first is the mandatory mediation with the method of comparative analysis to define the concept of compulsory mediation. Judge then lists several manifestations of compulsory mediation judge in reality, more vividly to judge compulsory mediation phenomenon of interpretation, from discovery the characteristics of the strong concealment. And also from the psychological angle analysis the behavior of compulsory mediation, the mediation in the policy under the guidance of the easy utilitarian psychology. Finally it discusses the existing constraint mechanism for the judge mediation has some defects, can be said that the constraint effect of weak and feeble.
The third chapter is based on the study of the first two chapters, the key points of integrity as the joint of the credibility of the judiciary and judicial mediation behavior, the concept of innovation integrity judge mediation, the full interpretation of the research results on the theory of integrity, the integrity of the connotation of the judge mediation, explored the theory and basic requirements of evaluation criteria. Finally, further analysis the relationship between the integrity of judges mediation and judicial credibility, integrity puts forward the judge mediation is conducive to the improvement of the judicial credibility point of view.
The fourth chapter is the focus of this creation, but also innovation research, which is based on the characteristics of the behavior of constructing optimal design of mediation judge integrity mediation mechanism. Because the judge forced mediation has strong concealment, there is a close relationship between the psychological factors and the judge, because of this paper to establish the integrity of the judge mediation mechanism is integrity mechanism with the incentive way. The author uses the principal-agent theory to detailed analysis of judicial mediation in economics in the selection process, and from the management system, credit system, legal environment, legal protection four aspects, put forward the construction of the judge mediation mechanism to guide the path of integrity, consistent with the interests of the parties to the judge's behavior choice, namely integrity the establishment of judicial mediation. Honesty mediation mechanism can not only standardize mediation of the judge, the judge to cultivate awareness of integrity, to create public confidence in the judicial environment, and to improve The credibility of the judiciary is of practical significance.

【学位授予单位】：上海大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D926.2

【参考文献】