法院调解自愿原则的实现路径

发布时间：2018-01-30 00:27

本文关键词： 法院调解自愿原则调解协议　出处：《湘潭大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2017年04期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：学界关于法院调解自愿原则的理解是调解启动上和调解协议的达成上均应确保当事人自愿。但在司法实践中,法院调解在调解方式的启动、调解协议的达成以及调解协议的履行方面均难落实自愿原则。其要因是,法院调解的发展受司法政策的过度影响,且学界对自愿原则的理解尚未探及当事人的心理层面。结合法院调解的司法实践,落实自愿原则应贯彻"当调则调,当判则判"之司法规律。法官对适宜调解的案件在采用调解方式时应适度突破"自愿"之禁锢,在调解协议的达成上则应确保当事人的真实意思表达,凸显其自愿。唯有如此,才能真正贯彻落实调解自愿原则。
[Abstract]:The understanding of the voluntary principle of court mediation in academic circles is that both the initiation of mediation and the conclusion of mediation agreement should ensure the parties' willingness. However, in judicial practice, court mediation is initiated in the mediation mode. The conclusion of mediation agreement and the implementation of mediation agreement are difficult to implement the voluntary principle. The reason is that the development of court mediation is excessively affected by judicial policy. And the understanding of voluntary principle has not yet explored the psychological level of the parties. Combined with the judicial practice of court mediation, the implementation of the voluntary principle should be carried out "when the principle of regulation." The judge should break through the restraint of "voluntary" when adopting the mediation method, and ensure the expression of the true meaning of the parties in the conclusion of the mediation agreement. Only in this way can we truly implement the voluntary principle of mediation.
【作者单位】：湘潭大学法学院;
【基金】：湖南省社科规划项目“法院调解自愿原则研究”(15JD57)成果
【分类号】：D926.2
【正文快照】： 长期以来,学界关于法院调解存废抑或改革之争,归根到底是调解的自愿原则能否落实,调解的强制性是否正当的问题。有学者认为,强制性的法院调解已经对我国法治基本价值构成了伤害,我国应选择以判决为主导的纠纷解决制度,在坚持调解自治与自愿原则的前提下,对调解进行法律规制。[

【参考文献】