规范法官自由裁量权之建议

发布时间：2018-01-30 16:31

本文关键词： 法官自由裁量权规范立法司法　出处：《延边大学》2012年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：法官自由裁量权是指法官将法律规范和具体的法律事实相结合的过程中能够推出两个以上具有合法性的结论时行使的选择权。在实践中存在法官自由裁量权是顺应历史潮流的现象,同时自由裁量权也不能消除,只能在司法实践当中进一步的规范。但是,法官自由裁量权毕竟有其积极的一面和消极的一面,我们所能做的就是为其正当的行使创造空间,并使其通过程序的行使和说明理由使其正当化；对其过大的裁量空间予以缩减,以防止其滥用和扩张法。同时在实践当中法官的个人法学素养、审判经验等不相同,导致“同案不同判”的现象时有发生,因此,《人民法院量刑指导意见(试行)》的出台在一定程度上对法官自由裁量权提出了一定的规范,指导意见也有其自身的发展趋势,在今后的实践当中,指导意见也会向着更加规范的方向发展,本文也将以《人民法院量刑指导意见(试行)》为视角,对法官自由裁量权提出一些规范的建议。本文分为四部分,第一部分从法官自由裁量权的概念入手,介绍中外学者对自由裁量权的见解,并得出自己的结论,并且阐述法官自由裁量权的特点与范围。这部分在整篇论文中起到了铺垫和引导的作用。第二部分介绍了自由裁量权在刑事审判中的具体表现,为下文规范自由裁量权分析做了准备。第三部分介绍了自由裁量权的出台的背景、价值、运行状况以及对其出台的一些思考。第四部分结合《人民法院量刑指导意见(试行)》提出在立法及司法上对自由裁量权规范的意见。
[Abstract]:The discretion of a judge is the right of choice exercised by a judge in the process of combining legal norms with specific legal facts. In practice, the existence of a judge's discretion is in conformity with the existence of two or more legitimate conclusions. The phenomenon of responding to the trend of history. At the same time, discretion can not be eliminated, can only be further standardized in judicial practice. However, the discretion of judges after all has its positive side and negative side. All we can do is create space for its proper exercise and justify it through the exercise and justification of procedures; At the same time, in practice, judges' personal legal literacy, trial experience and other differences, resulting in "different decisions in the same case" phenomenon occurred from time to time. Therefore, the introduction of the sentencing guidance of the people's Court (trial) to a certain extent put forward certain norms on the discretion of judges, the guidance also has its own development trend, in the future practice. The guidance will also develop towards a more standardized direction, this paper will also take the sentencing guidance of the people's Court (trial) as the angle of view, and put forward some standard suggestions to the judge's discretion. This paper is divided into four parts. The first part starts with the concept of the discretion of judges, introduces the opinions of Chinese and foreign scholars on discretion, and draws its own conclusions. And elaborated the judge discretion characteristic and the scope. This part has played the role of paving and guiding in the entire thesis. The second part has introduced the discretion in the criminal trial concrete performance. The third part introduces the background and value of discretion. Part 4th, combined with the sentencing guidance of the people's Court (trial), puts forward the opinions on the regulation of discretion in legislation and judicature.
【学位授予单位】：延边大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D926.2

【参考文献】