相对合理主义:传媒与司法冲突衡平之向度

发布时间：2018-01-31 01:40

本文关键词： 传媒司法冲突衡平相对合理主义　出处：《云南行政学院学报》2014年01期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：传媒是传播信息的媒介或方式,表达自由始终是传媒价值选择之核心。司法是法定机关依照法定职权和程序具体适用法律处理案件的专门性活动,司法的核心价值观应当体现为对公正的不懈追求。传媒适当监督司法,有利于司法公开和司法民主,但传媒监督异化也会影响司法公正的实现。对传媒与司法的冲突平衡中,逐渐形成了司法对传媒宽容论与抑制论两种倾向。中国语境下司法对传媒无法过度宽容,亦无理由过度抑制,在司法对传媒激进的抑制与消极的宽容之间,相对合理主义可以为问题解决提供一种可能的范式,我们应当通过实现传媒自由基础上的自我克制与司法独立基础上的程序正当来衡平传媒与司法的冲突。
[Abstract]:The media is the medium or the way to spread information, the freedom of expression is always the core of the media value choice. The judicature is the specialized activity that the legal organ applies the law to deal with the case in accordance with the legal authority and procedure. The core values of justice should be reflected in the unremitting pursuit of justice. The proper supervision of justice by the media is conducive to judicial openness and judicial democracy. However, the alienation of media supervision will also affect the realization of judicial justice. Judicial tolerance to the media and inhibition of the two tendencies gradually formed. In the Chinese context, there is no reason for excessive tolerance of the media, between the radical suppression of the media and negative tolerance. Relative rationalism can provide a possible paradigm for problem-solving. We should balance the conflict between media and judicature by realizing self-restraint on the basis of media freedom and due process on the basis of judicial independence.
【作者单位】：安阳师范学院;
【分类号】：G206;D926
【正文快照】： 传媒即传播信息之媒介,是民主社会言论表达自由的基本介质。司法即法律裁断之活动,是社会基本正义的最后一道门槛。传媒积极追求自由表达促进社会发展,司法通过案件裁判保障社会正义,二者虽然在工具选择上相异,但在维护社会正义的价值诉求上则可能趋同。几乎相异的工具选择与

【参考文献】