论我国的网络舆论监督与司法公正

发布时间：2018-02-03 06:06

本文关键词： 网络舆论司法公正冲突与协调良性互动　出处：《山西大学》2011年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：由于公众在传统媒体上评论司法审判活动的渠道阻塞性及网络自身的优越性,网络越来越受到人们的喜爱,成为公众评论案件,监督司法审判活动的重要平台。因此,网络舆论也成为了监督司法审判的重要方式和不可忽视的力量,其可以使司法案件备受关注,督促案件的审理趋向公开、公平和公正,通过其与司法审判形成良性互动,从而促进司法公正的实现。然而,一旦对网络舆论不加任何限制和监管而任由其表达,那么其必将干扰法官的判断,影响司法审判的独立性和公正性。因此,寻找到网络舆论监督与司法审判之间冲突的原因,如何有效化解网络舆论监督与司法审判之间的矛盾,实现网络舆论与司法审判之间的良性互动,对于促进司法公正的实现具有重要的意义。本文首先通过对舆论、正义等基本概念的考察、概括、总结和分析,得出网络舆论监督和司法公正的概念,为下文论证我国的网络舆论监督和司法公正打下了理论基础。其次,通过对网络舆论与司法审判冲突的表现形式的概括总结,来探求造成二者冲突的各种原因。网络舆论在监督司法审判过程中,由于网络舆论和司法审判的固有属性之不同,因此,网络舆论与司法审判在案件事实认定标准、追求标准及对待案件态度上的差异导致了二者的冲突。然而,这在本质上准确的体现了利益主体之间对于法的价值的不同追求而产生的冲突。所以,网络舆论与司法公正冲突的本质是网络舆论与司法审判在自由与正义、自由与秩序、权利与权力等价值维度的冲突,这些价值冲突是可以调和的。最后,希望通过上述的理论分析,能够准确定位网络舆论,实现对网络舆论的法律监管,解决网络舆论与司法审判的冲突并使它们形成良性互动,最终实现司法公正。网络舆论的定位在于它只是满足公众知情权和自由表达公众意愿的工具,网络舆论关于司法审判的报道与评议只是在帮助公众实现知情权和言论自由权,而其对司法活动的监督只是由此产生的副产品。因此,网络舆论的存在价值在于满足公众对司法审判信息的知情权,其职责在于客观、全面、真实的报道和评价司法审判活动,监督司法审判活动公开、公正、公平的进行。而司法审判的价值在于通过公开的审理,公正的判决,实现审判“三个效果”的统一来化解社会予盾,实现司法公正所以,网络舆论监督与司法审判的共同目标是一致的,即通过自身的努力来促进司法公正的实现。在实践方面,希望可以为网络舆论正确监督司法审判,及对其自身的法律监管提供理论依据。
[Abstract]:Because the public comments on the judicial activities in the traditional media channel obstruction and the advantages of the network itself, the network has become more and more popular and become a public comment cases. Therefore, the network of public opinion has become an important way to supervise the judicial trial and can not be ignored, it can make judicial cases receive much attention, urge the trial of cases tend to be open. Fairness and justice, through its benign interaction with the judicial trial, thereby promoting the realization of judicial justice. However, once the network of public opinion without any restrictions and supervision and let it express. So it will interfere with the judge's judgment and affect the independence and impartiality of the judicial trial. Therefore, find out the reason of the conflict between the network public opinion supervision and the judicial trial. How to effectively resolve the contradiction between network public opinion supervision and judicial trial and realize the benign interaction between network public opinion and judicial trial is of great significance to promote the realization of judicial justice. First of all, through the investigation of the basic concepts of public opinion, justice and other basic concepts, summarized, summarized and analyzed, the concept of network public opinion supervision and judicial justice is obtained. It lays a theoretical foundation for the following argumentation of our country's network public opinion supervision and judicial justice. Secondly, it summarizes the manifestation of the conflict between network public opinion and judicial trial. To explore the causes of the conflict between the two. Network public opinion in the process of supervision of judicial trial, because of the inherent nature of network public opinion and judicial trial is different, so. The differences between network public opinion and judicial trial in the standards of case fact determination, pursuit of standards and attitude towards cases lead to the conflict between the two. This in essence accurately reflects the conflict between the interests of the different pursuit of the value of law. Therefore, the essence of the conflict between network public opinion and judicial justice is the freedom and justice of network public opinion and judicial trial. Freedom and order, rights and power and other value dimensions of conflict, these value conflicts can be reconciled. Finally, I hope that through the above theoretical analysis, can accurately locate the network public opinion. Realize the legal supervision of network public opinion, resolve the conflict between network public opinion and judicial trial and make them form benign interaction. The orientation of network public opinion is that it is only a tool to satisfy the public's right to know and to express the public's will freely. The network public opinion about the judicial trial reports and comments only helps the public to realize the right to know and the right to freedom of expression, and its supervision of the judicial activities is only a by-product. The existence value of network public opinion lies in satisfying the public's right to know about judicial trial information, and its duty lies in objective, comprehensive and true reporting and evaluation of judicial trial activities, and in supervising the openness and fairness of judicial trial activities. The value of judicial trial lies in the realization of the unity of the "three effects" of trial through public trial, fair judgment, and the realization of judicial justice. The common goal of network public opinion supervision and judicial trial is the same, that is, through its own efforts to promote the realization of judicial justice. In practice, I hope to correctly supervise the judicial trial for the network public opinion. And its own legal supervision to provide the theoretical basis.
【学位授予单位】：山西大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D926;G206

【参考文献】