义务之诉中司法权的界限

发布时间：2018-02-04 20:29

本文关键词： 义务之诉司法权界限行政之法律拘束与形成自由　出处：《西南政法大学》2013年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：义务之诉指行政相对人向法院提起诉讼，请求法院判决行政机关应作成具体行政行为，或者应作成特定内容之具体行政行为的诉讼。与传统撤销之诉，仅消极除去违法行政行为不同，义务之诉旨在使司法权以更积极的方式，干预行政机关作成决定，为当事人权利提供更为完整和有效的保护。但司法权与行政权皆有其固有之界限，司法权之干预若不加限定，则侵害行政权之形成自由，违背司法权的性质。因此，在义务之诉中，应将司法权限定在何种范围内，始能既发挥其完整有效保护人民权利之功能，又尊重行政权之形成自由，便成为问题。本文对义务之诉中司法权与行政权的界限进行考察，着重分析义务之诉审理中有关诉权、请求权、裁判时机成熟等三个问题，以期对义务之诉中司法权界限的问题有一更为清晰的认识。全文由引言、四个章节组成。引言部分简要介绍了义务之诉的难题与研究方法的选择。第一章，对大陆法系国家义务之诉的审理框架作了简要介绍，又对义务之诉的功能和遭遇的难题作了讨论，从义务之诉的审理框架中选取了诉权的审查、请求权基础的审查、裁判时机成熟的判断三者，作为义务之诉中司法权界限的考察对象。第二章，在有关诉权问题的论述中，着重介绍了保护规范理论，再据其讨论了义务之诉中的无瑕疵裁量请求权问题。第三章，对请求权基础审查作了介绍，，并就我国学者归纳出的几类请求权基础作了论述。第四章，先简述了裁判时机成熟理论的意义，再结合裁量理论，对涉及裁量决定与带判断余地决定的行政行为进行讨论,分辨出司法权在判决裁量处分时的界限。最后就我国履行判决的审理情况作了对比，建议我国尝试以法教义体系组织既有司法实践经验，增强判决说理部分的解释力，也便于实务操作与学说探讨。
[Abstract]:The action of obligation refers to the lawsuit filed by the administrative counterpart to the court requesting the court to decide that the administrative organ should act as a specific administrative act or the action of the specific administrative act of a specific content. Only the negative removal of illegal administrative acts different, the purpose of the obligation of litigation in order to make the judicial power in a more positive way, to interfere with the administrative organs to make decisions. To provide more complete and effective protection for the rights of the parties. But the judicial power and the executive power have their inherent boundaries, if the judicial intervention is not limited, the formation of the executive power will be infringed. Therefore, in the litigation of obligation, judicial power should be limited to what range, in order to play its full and effective function of protecting the rights of the people, and respect the formation of the freedom of executive power. This article investigates the boundary between judicial power and administrative power in the litigation of obligation, focusing on the analysis of three issues: the right of action, the right of claim and the ripe time of adjudication. In order to have a clearer understanding of the boundaries of judicial power in compulsory litigation. The full text is composed of introduction, four chapters. The introduction part briefly introduces the difficult problems and the choice of research methods. Chapter one. This paper briefly introduces the trial frame of the civil law system country's obligation action, discusses the function and difficulties of the obligation action, and selects the examination of the right of action from the framework of the civil law system. The examination of the basis of the right of claim and the judgment of the judge's time are the objects of investigation of the limits of judicial power in the litigation of obligation. Chapter two focuses on the theory of protection norms in the discussion of the issue of the right of action. The third chapter introduces the review of the basis of the right of claim, and discusses several types of the basis of the right of claim. Chapter 4th. First of all, this paper briefly introduces the significance of the theory of mature judgment, and then discusses the administrative behavior involving discretion decision and decision with the margin of judgment combined with the theory of discretion. Finally, the author makes a comparison of the trial situation of our country to fulfill the judgment, and suggests that our country try to organize the judicial practice experience with the legal doctrine system. Enhance the interpretation of the judgment reasoning, but also facilitate practical operation and theoretical discussion.
【学位授予单位】：西南政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：D926

【参考文献】