当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 司法论文 >

试论英国新型律师事务所及对我国的借鉴意义

发布时间:2018-02-16 09:58

  本文关键词: 新型律师事务所 非律师合伙人 法律服务市场 出处:《中国政法大学》2011年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文


【摘要】:2007年10月30日经过皇家御准,英格兰和威尔士通过了《法律服务法》(Legal Services Act 2007),为一个长久而繁琐的规制改革画上了完美的句号。该法的通过不仅为英国的法律服务市场带来了福音,也对世界范围内的法律服务市场具有重要意义。根据该法的规定,在英格兰和威尔士的土壤中将生长出新型律师事务所。新型律师事务所解除了传统律师事务所对合伙人律师身份和性质的限制,允许非律师的自然人和机构成为律师事务所的合伙人。虽然新型律师事务所对世界范围来说都是“新生儿”,然而,这一新生事物的出现可谓众望所归,笔者认为其对我国律师业也将产生重要的影响。加入WTO之后,我国的法律服务市场逐渐对外开放,如何与世界接轨建立高效、规范的律师事务所成为我国律师业发展的当务之急。在经济全球一体化和世界法律服务市场日趋融合的今天,作为法律服务人口大国,只有紧跟世界法律服务市场的发展趋势,寻求适合我国律师业发展的可持续道路,才能在国际市场上占据有力地位。 本文围绕如下问题和逻辑思路展开研究和探索:1.为什么英国会出现新型律师事务所?新型律师事务所是什么?其发展现状如何? 2.新型律师事务所与其他非传统的律师事务所或者先进制度之间有何联系?3.我国法律服务市场是否有必要引进新型律师事务所?4.我国引进新型律师事务所的相关制度构建。全文共分为四章,此外还有前言和结论。 第一部分:全方位地向读者展示英国新型律师事务所产生的背景、原因和各种相关规定,以期读者能够对新型律师事务所概念化。为什么会在英国的大地上诞生新型律师事务所是研究新型律师事务所的出发点; 第二部分:将其他非传统的律师执业组织形式与新型律师事务所进行比较研究,以期更好地了解新型律师事务所存在的价值,以及其对我国的借鉴意义。 第三部分:结合上文对新型律师事务所的综合评述,结合中国法律服务市场的发展状况,试评述其对我国合伙律师事务所的借鉴意义,并探讨中国国情下新型律师事务所的发展可能性。 第四部门:针对引进非律师合伙人可能会出现的问题,结合我国法律服务市场的发展状况和现实国情,力图对新型律师事务所引进中国进行可能的制度构建。
[Abstract]:On October 30th 2007, with the Royal Assent, The passage of the legal Services Act 2007 in England and Wales has brought a perfect end to a long and cumbersome regulatory reform that has not only brought good news to Britain's legal services market. It is also of great importance to the worldwide market for legal services, according to the provisions of the Act, New law firms will grow in the soil of England and Wales. New law firms have lifted restrictions on the identity and nature of partners in traditional law firms. Natural persons and institutions that are not lawyers are allowed to become partners in law firms. Although new law firms are "newborns" around the world, the emergence of this new phenomenon is widely expected. After China's entry into WTO, the legal service market of our country will gradually open to the outside world. Standardized law firms have become the top priority for the development of the legal profession in our country. With the globalization of the world economy and the increasing integration of the world legal service market, as a large legal service country with a large population of legal services, it can only keep up with the development trend of the world legal service market. Only by seeking a sustainable road suitable for the development of China's lawyer industry, can it occupy a strong position in the international market. This paper studies and explores the following questions and logical ideas: 1. Why is there a new type of law firm in the UK? What's a new law firm? What is the status quo of its development? 2. What are the links between new law firms and other non-traditional law firms or advanced systems? 3. Is it necessary to introduce new law firms into our legal service market? 4. The related system construction of introducing new law firm in China. The full text is divided into four chapters, in addition, there are preface and conclusion. Part one: to show readers the background, reasons and regulations of the new law firms in the UK. It is hoped that the reader can conceptualize the new law firm. Why the new law firm was born in the United Kingdom is the starting point for the study of the new law firm; In the second part, the author makes a comparative study of other non-traditional lawyer practice organizations and new law firms in order to better understand the value of the new law firms and the significance of their reference to our country. The third part: combined with the comprehensive comments of the new law firms above and the development of the legal service market in China, the author tries to comment on its reference significance to the partnership law firms in China. And discusses the development possibility of the new law firm under the national conditions of China. Section 4th: aiming at the possible problems of introducing non-lawyer partners, combining the development of the legal service market in our country and the actual national conditions, the author tries to construct the possible system for the new law firms to introduce into China.
【学位授予单位】:中国政法大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2011
【分类号】:D926.5;D956.1

【引证文献】

相关硕士学位论文 前1条

1 李军伟;论律师执业中的利益冲突[D];苏州大学;2012年



本文编号:1515245

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/gongjianfalunwen/1515245.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户3fc0a***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com