论我国统一司法考试制度的发展与完善

发布时间：2018-02-21 05:35

本文关键词： 统一司法考试制度不足发展完善建议　出处：《西北大学》2011年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：2001年全国人民代表大会常务委员会通过了修订《中华人民共和国法官法》、《中华人民共和国检察官法》、《中华人民共和国律师法》的决议,并决定将原来的初任法官考试、初任检察官考试、律师职业资格考试停考一年,统一司法考试于2002年进行。自此,我国建立起了统一的法律职业资格考试制度(下文中称统一司法考试制度)。统一司法考试制度的确立在我国法治史上具有划时代的意义。它的建立架起了法学教育和司法实践之间的桥梁,将引导我国法学教育不断完善,为我国法治建设选拔合格的法律人才,使我国法律职业共同体的构建成为可能。但统一司法考试实践表明：它并没有产生预期的效果,反而暴露出许多不足。比如报考条件要求不严导致“准法律职业者”的综合素质参差不齐,考试模式及题型设置不合理,加剧法律职业人才的短缺,对法学教育造成的负面影响等问题。针对以上问题,本文在比较分析传统大陆法系国家法律职业资格考试制度先进经验的基础上,就我国统一司法考试制度的发展与完善提出建议。本文将分三部分进行论述：第一部分,对我国统一司法考试制度9年实践中暴露出的不足进行分析。第二部分,对传统大陆法系国家法律职业资格考试制度从报考资格、考试模式和法律职业培训制度等几个方面进行了比较分析,以期对我国统一司法考试制度的发展与完善提供有益的借鉴。第三部分,针对我国统一司法考试制度及其在实践中暴露出的不足,在借鉴大陆法系国家法律职业资格考试制度先进经验的基础上,对我国统一司法考试制度的发展与完善提出建议。
[Abstract]:In 2001, the standing Committee of the National people's Congress adopted a resolution amending the Law of the people's Republic of China on judges, the Law of the people's Republic of China on Public prosecutors, and the Law of the people's Republic of China on lawyers, and decided to examine the original initial judges, The initial public procurator examination, the lawyer profession qualification examination withdraws one year, the unified judicial examination is held in 2002. Since then, our country has established the unified legal profession qualification examination system (hereinafter referred to as the unified judicial examination system). The establishment of unified judicial examination system is of epoch-making significance in the history of the rule of law in our country. Its establishment has set up a bridge between legal education and judicial practice, which will lead to the continuous improvement of legal education in our country. The selection of qualified legal talents for the construction of our country's rule of law makes the construction of our legal profession community possible. However, the practice of unified judicial examination shows that: it does not produce the expected effect, but it exposes many shortcomings. For example, the lax requirements for registration conditions lead to the uneven comprehensive quality of "quasi-legal professionals". The examination mode and the question type setting are unreasonable, aggravate the shortage of the legal profession talented person, cause the negative influence to the law education and so on. Based on the comparative analysis of the advanced experience of the legal qualification examination system in the countries of the traditional continental law system, this paper puts forward some suggestions for the development and perfection of the unified judicial examination system in China. The first part analyzes the deficiency of our country's unified judicial examination system in 9 years' practice. In the second part, the author makes a comparative analysis of the legal qualification examination system in the countries of traditional continental law system from the aspects of registration qualification, examination mode and legal vocational training system, etc. In order to provide a useful reference for the development and improvement of the unified judicial examination system in China. The third part, in view of our country unifies the judicial examination system and its in the practice exposes the insufficiency, in drawing lessons from the continental law system country legal profession qualification examination system advanced experience foundation, This paper puts forward some suggestions on the development and perfection of the unified judicial examination system in China.
【学位授予单位】：西北大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D90-4;D926.15

【参考文献】